Al Saifi Said, Zhang Liying, Morgan Scott C, Lupe Krystine, Haddad Alain, Gaudet Marc, Dennis Kristopher
Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital and the University of Ottawa, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, K1H8L6, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 2;33(4):344. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09384-y.
We aimed to determine the incidence of and explore risk factors for pelvic insufficiency fractures (PIFs) among patients that received curative-intent pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic (GYN), gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) cancers.
We audited records of adult patients with GYN, GI, and GU cancers who received neoadjuvant, definitive, or adjuvant pelvic IMRT from 2011 to 2015 with a treatment volume that included the primary tumor or post-operative bed and at least one pelvic lymph node region, and a prescription dose of at least 40 Gy (if conventionally fractionated at 1.8-2 Gy per fraction) or a prescription dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions for patients with rectal cancer treated with hypo-fractionated neoadjuvant short course IMRT. All baseline and follow-up pelvic imaging reports were reviewed to identify PIF diagnoses. Demographic and relevant clinical, treatment, and dosimetric factors were analyzed to explore risk factors for PIFs.
Among 658 audited patients, 46 (7%) developed 86 PIFs. The incidence for GYN, GI, and GU patients was 8% (13/159), 11% (30/276), and 1% (3/223), respectively, with anal and endometrial subsites having the highest incidence at 14% each. IMRT was delivered as neoadjuvant therapy for 16/46 (35%), definitive therapy for 22/46 (48%), and adjuvant therapy for 8/46 (17%). The median time to PIF diagnosis was 14 months (range 3-53 months), and 26/46 (57%) were symptomatic at diagnosis. The most common PIF location was the sacrum (67/86 [78%]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis found female gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.74, 95% CI 1.36-5.80; p = 0.006), osteoporosis (OR 6.91, 95% CI 2.43-18.8; p = 0.0002), and a dose fractionation of 25 Gy in 5 fractions (compared to schedules of > 25 to < 50 Gy (OR 5.34, 95% CI 1.87-15.6; p = 0.0019) or ≥ 50 Gy (OR 9.53, 95% CI 1.82-50.1; p = 0.0077)) to be significant PIF risk factors.
In our cohort, PIFs were a common complication for patients with GYN and GI cancers, but not GU cancers, in the IMRT era. Most PIFs occurred within 2 years of treatment, and most occurred in the sacrum. Female patients and patients with osteoporosis appeared to be at higher risk. Prospective studies using validated PIF diagnostic criteria should further examine the relationships between PIFs and dosimetric variables, including hypo-fractionated regimens such as 25 Gy in 5 fractions.
我们旨在确定接受根治性盆腔调强放射治疗(IMRT)的妇科(GYN)、胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)癌症患者中盆腔不全骨折(PIF)的发生率,并探索其危险因素。
我们审核了2011年至2015年期间接受新辅助、根治性或辅助性盆腔IMRT的GYN、GI和GU癌症成年患者的记录,治疗体积包括原发肿瘤或术后瘤床以及至少一个盆腔淋巴结区域,处方剂量至少为40 Gy(如果按常规分割,每次分割1.8 - 2 Gy),或对于接受低分割新辅助短程IMRT治疗的直肠癌患者,处方剂量为25 Gy分5次。回顾所有基线和随访盆腔影像学报告以确定PIF诊断。分析人口统计学和相关临床、治疗及剂量学因素以探索PIF的危险因素。
在658例审核患者中,46例(7%)发生了86处PIF。GYN、GI和GU患者的发生率分别为8%(13/159)、11%(30/276)和1%(3/223),其中肛门和子宫内膜亚部位的发生率最高,均为14%。IMRT作为新辅助治疗的有16/46(35%),根治性治疗的有22/46(48%),辅助治疗的有8/46(17%)。PIF诊断的中位时间为14个月(范围3 - 53个月),26/46(57%)在诊断时有症状。PIF最常见的部位是骶骨(67/86 [78%])。多变量逻辑回归分析发现女性(优势比[OR] 2.74,95%置信区间1.36 - 5.80;p = 0.006)、骨质疏松(OR 6.91,95%置信区间2.43 - 18.8;p = 0.0002)以及25 Gy分5次的剂量分割(与> 25至< 50 Gy(OR 5.34,95%置信区间1.87 - 15.6;p = 0.0019)或≥ 50 Gy(OR 9.53,95%置信区间1.82 - 50.1;p = 0.0077)的方案相比)是显著的PIF危险因素。
在我们的队列中,在IMRT时代,PIF是GYN和GI癌症患者而非GU癌症患者的常见并发症。大多数PIF发生在治疗后2年内,且大多数发生在骶骨。女性患者和骨质疏松患者似乎风险更高。使用经过验证的PIF诊断标准的前瞻性研究应进一步检查PIF与剂量学变量之间的关系,包括25 Gy分5次的低分割方案。