Feinberg Joshua A, Miah Pabel, DiMaggio Charles, Pourkey Nakisa, Chun Kim Jennifer, Goodgal Jenny, Guth Amber, Axelrod Deborah, Schnabel Freya
Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Am Surg. 2025 Jul;91(7):1149-1155. doi: 10.1177/00031348251329496. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
BackgroundBreast conserving surgery represents the preferred surgical treatment option for patients with early-stage breast cancer. Reexcision rates are generally higher for patients undergoing lumpectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared to invasive breast cancer, as the microscopic extent of disease is difficult to assess during excision. This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients undergoing BCS for pure DCIS and reexcision rates over time, including the effect of the MarginProbe™ device.MethodsWe queried our prospectively maintained Institutional Breast Cancer Database for patients diagnosed with DCIS and treated with BCS as their primary procedure from 2010-2021. The primary endpoint was the rate of reexcision. Variables of interest included age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, mode of diagnostic imaging, mammographic breast density, method of core biopsy, nuclear grade, size of DCIS, multifocality, DCIS subtype, and MarginProbe™ use.ResultsPapillary DCIS ( < 0.004) and larger size ( < 0.001) was associated with an increased reexcision rate. There were also differences in the method of core biopsy ( < 0.001), with stereotactic core biopsy predominating among patients who did not require reexcision (71.3% vs 49.5%). In an unadjusted estimate for the odds ratio for association, patients who had MarginProbe™ used were 81% less likely to require reexcision (OR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.12, 0.31, < 0.0001).ConclusionYounger age, papillary DCIS, larger DCIS size, and non-stereotactic core biopsy method were found to be associated with higher reexcision rates. Additionally, patients whose primary procedures included intraoperative margin assessment with the MarginProbe™ were significantly less likely to require reexcision.
背景
保乳手术是早期乳腺癌患者首选的手术治疗方式。与浸润性乳腺癌相比,导管原位癌(DCIS)患者接受肿块切除术后的再次切除率通常更高,因为在切除过程中难以评估疾病的微观范围。本研究调查了接受保乳手术治疗纯DCIS患者的临床病理特征以及随时间变化的再次切除率,包括MarginProbe™设备的影响。
方法
我们查询了前瞻性维护的机构乳腺癌数据库,以获取2010年至2021年期间被诊断为DCIS并接受保乳手术作为主要治疗方法的患者信息。主要终点是再次切除率。感兴趣的变量包括诊断时的年龄、种族/民族、诊断性成像方式、乳腺钼靶密度、粗针活检方法、核分级、DCIS大小、多灶性、DCIS亚型以及MarginProbe™的使用情况。
结果
乳头状DCIS(<0.004)和较大尺寸(<0.001)与再次切除率增加相关。粗针活检方法也存在差异(<0.001),在不需要再次切除的患者中,立体定向粗针活检占主导(71.3%对49.5%)。在未调整的关联比值比估计中,使用MarginProbe™的患者再次切除的可能性降低81%(OR = 0.19,95%CI = 0.12,0.31,<0.0001)。
结论
发现年龄较小、乳头状DCIS、DCIS尺寸较大以及非立体定向粗针活检方法与较高的再次切除率相关。此外,主要手术包括使用MarginProbe™进行术中切缘评估的患者再次切除的可能性显著降低。