Shah Khanjan B, Aridi Hanaa, Dake Michael D, Doros Gheorghe, Farber Alik, Menard Matthew T, Motaganahalli Raghu, Ochoa Chaar Cassius, Rosenfield Kenneth, Scali Salvatore T, Shah Samir K, Strong Michael B, Upchurch Gilbert R, Robinson William P
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville (K.B.S.).
Division of Vascular Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis (H.A., R.M.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jun;18(6):e014833. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014833. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
The impact of age on outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia has not been studied in a prospective trial.
A total of 1780 patients were grouped into age quartiles (≤55 years, 55< age ≤65 years, 65< age ≤75 years, and >75 years) and by type of revascularization (open bypass or endovascular). The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE) or death, and the secondary outcomes were above-ankle amputation, reintervention, and major adverse cardiovascular events.
Death and major adverse cardiovascular events were significantly higher in the oldest quartile (>75 years), whereas MALE and above-ankle amputation were highest in the youngest cohort (≤55 years). Younger patients (≤55 years) had the lowest adjusted risk of MALE or all-cause death with open bypass compared with endovascular revascularization. There was no difference in MALE or all-cause death by treatment strategy in patients >75 years of age.
Older age was associated with the highest risks of death and major adverse cardiovascular events and the lowest risks of MALE and above-ankle amputation among patients enrolled in BEST-CLI (Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia). Age also had a differential impact by revascularization strategy: youngest patients had the lowest risk of MALE and all-cause death with bypass surgery compared with endovascular revascularization, while there was no difference among those >75 years. These data should be used to facilitate shared decision-making in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.
URL: https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/best_cli/; Unique identifier: HLB02932424a.
年龄对慢性肢体威胁性缺血血管重建术后结局的影响尚未在前瞻性试验中进行研究。
总共1780例患者按年龄四分位数分组(≤55岁、55<年龄≤65岁、65<年龄≤75岁和>75岁),并按血管重建类型(开放旁路手术或血管腔内治疗)分组。主要结局为严重肢体不良事件(MALE)或死亡,次要结局为踝关节以上截肢、再次干预和主要不良心血管事件。
死亡和主要不良心血管事件在年龄最大的四分位数组(>75岁)中显著更高,而MALE和踝关节以上截肢在最年轻的队列(≤55岁)中最高。与血管腔内血管重建相比,年轻患者(≤55岁)接受开放旁路手术后发生MALE或全因死亡的校正风险最低。75岁以上患者的治疗策略在MALE或全因死亡方面无差异。
在BEST-CLI(慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者最佳血管腔内治疗与最佳手术治疗)研究中,年龄较大与死亡和主要不良心血管事件的最高风险相关,而与MALE和踝关节以上截肢的最低风险相关。年龄对血管重建策略也有不同影响:最年轻的患者接受旁路手术时发生MALE和全因死亡的风险低于血管腔内血管重建,而75岁以上患者之间无差异。这些数据应用于促进慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的共同决策。
网址:https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/best_cli/;唯一标识符:HLB02932424a。