Edwards G
Drug Alcohol Depend. 1985 May;15(1-2):19-34. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(85)90026-2.
D.L. Davies's paper on 'Normal drinking in recovered alcohol addicts' was published in 1962 (Q.J. Stud. Alcohol, 23, (1962) 94). The 18 commentaries on this report which were published shortly afterwards in the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol are analysed in terms of the perceived relevance of his findings for clinical practice. This initial and largely negative appraisal of the import of Davies's article is contrasted with later assessments which have seen this study as contributing to a crucial paradigm shift. The question is raised as to whether the concept of paradigm shift can be applied satisfactorily to a field where several different scientific disciplines are defining the nature of the problem, or whether alternatively or in addition the story should be understood in terms of a competition between medicine and psychology for 'ownership' of addiction.
D.L. 戴维斯关于“康复酒精成瘾者的正常饮酒”的论文于1962年发表（《酒精研究季刊》，第23卷，（1962年）第94页）。随后不久在《酒精研究季刊》上发表的对该报告的18篇评论，根据其研究结果对临床实践的感知相关性进行了分析。对戴维斯文章重要性的这种最初且大多是否定的评价，与后来将该研究视为促成关键范式转变的评估形成了对比。有人提出这样一个问题，即范式转变的概念是否能令人满意地应用于一个由几个不同科学学科界定问题性质的领域，或者说，这个故事是否应该换个角度，或者除此之外，从医学和心理学争夺成瘾“主导权”的竞争角度来理解。
