Westrick Ashly C, Bailey Zinzi, Schlumbrecht Matthew
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 May;196:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.03.041. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
The influence of residential segregation and provider density on endometrial (EC) presentation is not fully known. Our objective was to determine associations between county-level obstetrics-gynecology provider density and residential segregation as measured by the Index of Concentration (ICE) at the Extremes on late-stage EC diagnoses in Florida.
All malignant EC cases were identified from 2001 to 2017 in the Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS). Using 5-year estimates from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey, five county-level ICE variables were calculated: economic (high vs low), race and/or ethnicity (non-Hispanic white [NHW] vs. non)-Hispanic Black [NHB] and NHW vs. Hispanic), and racialized economic segregation (low-income NHB vs. high-income NHW and low-income Hispanic vs. high-income NHW). County-level provider density was calculated. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models were specified to estimate the associations.
There were 44,678 EC cases with stage information. More NHB women (27.1 %) were diagnosed with aggressive EC histologies relative to NHW (16.4 %) and Hispanic women (15.5 %) (p < 0.001). NHB and Hispanic women had significantly greater odds of being diagnosed with later-stage EC compared to NHW women, regardless of residential segregation (OR: 1.46, 95 % CI: 1.36, 1.56 and OR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.01, 1.17, respectively). Women living in the most economically disadvantaged Hispanic segregated counties had greater odds of being diagnosed with later-stage EC compared to those living in more NHW segregated areas (OR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.00, 1.35). Provider density was not associated with later-stage diagnosis.
Advanced stage EC at diagnosis seems to be largely independent of provider density and residential segregation.
居住隔离和医疗服务提供者密度对子宫内膜癌(EC)临床表现的影响尚不完全清楚。我们的目的是确定佛罗里达州晚期EC诊断中,县级妇产科医疗服务提供者密度与通过极端集中度指数(ICE)衡量的居住隔离之间的关联。
从佛罗里达癌症数据系统(FCDS)中识别出2001年至2017年所有恶性EC病例。利用2013 - 2017年美国社区调查的5年估计数据,计算了五个县级ICE变量:经济方面(高与低)、种族和/或族裔(非西班牙裔白人[NHW]与非西班牙裔黑人[NHB]以及NHW与西班牙裔),以及种族化经济隔离(低收入NHB与高收入NHW和低收入西班牙裔与高收入NHW)。计算县级医疗服务提供者密度。指定多变量调整逻辑回归模型来估计关联。
有44,678例有分期信息的EC病例。与NHW女性(16.4%)和西班牙裔女性(15.5%)相比,更多NHB女性(27.1%)被诊断为侵袭性EC组织学类型(p < 0.001)。与NHW女性相比,NHB和西班牙裔女性被诊断为晚期EC的几率显著更高,无论居住隔离情况如何(OR分别为:1.46,95%CI:1.36,1.56和OR:1.09,95%CI:1.01,1.17)。与居住在更多NHW隔离地区的女性相比,生活在经济上最弱势的西班牙裔隔离县的女性被诊断为晚期EC的几率更高(OR:1.16,95%CI:1.00,1.35)。医疗服务提供者密度与晚期诊断无关。
诊断时的晚期EC似乎在很大程度上与医疗服务提供者密度和居住隔离无关。