Kisa Adnan, Kisa Sezer
School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University of Applied Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Department of International Health and Sustainable Development, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, U.S.A.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 3;24(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02451-0.
Health-related conspiracy theories undermine trust in healthcare, exacerbate health inequities, and contribute to harmful health behaviors such as vaccine hesitancy and reliance on unproven treatments. These theories disproportionately impact marginalized populations, further widening health disparities. Their rapid spread, amplified by social media algorithms and digital misinformation networks, exacerbates public health challenges, highlighting the urgency of understanding their prevalence, key drivers, and mitigation strategies.
This scoping review synthesizes research on health-related conspiracy theories, focusing on their prevalence, impacts on health behaviors and outcomes, contributing factors, and counter-measures. Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a systematic search of six databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus) was conducted. Studies were screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, with thematic synthesis categorizing findings across diverse health contexts.
The review revealed pervasive conspiracy beliefs surrounding HIV/AIDS, vaccines, pharmaceutical companies, and COVID-19, linked to reduced vaccine uptake, increased mistrust in health authorities, and negative mental health outcomes such as anxiety and depression. Key drivers included sociopolitical distrust, cognitive biases, low scientific literacy, and the unchecked proliferation of misinformation on digital platforms. Promising countermeasures included inoculation messaging, media literacy interventions, and two-sided refutational techniques. However, their long-term effectiveness remains uncertain, as few studies assess their sustained impact across diverse sociopolitical contexts.
Health-related conspiracy theories present a growing public health challenge that undermines global health equity. While several interventions show potential, further research is needed to evaluate their effectiveness across diverse populations and contexts. Targeted efforts to rebuild trust in healthcare systems and strengthen critical health literacy are essential to mitigate the harmful effects of these conspiracy beliefs.
与健康相关的阴谋论破坏了对医疗保健的信任,加剧了健康不平等,并导致了诸如疫苗犹豫和依赖未经证实的治疗等有害健康行为。这些理论对边缘化人群的影响尤为严重,进一步扩大了健康差距。它们通过社交媒体算法和数字错误信息网络迅速传播,加剧了公共卫生挑战,凸显了了解其流行程度、关键驱动因素和缓解策略的紧迫性。
本范围综述综合了关于与健康相关的阴谋论的研究,重点关注其流行程度、对健康行为和结果的影响、促成因素及对策。采用阿克西和奥马利的框架以及乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南,对六个数据库(PubMed、Embase、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、心理学文摘数据库和Scopus)进行了系统检索。使用预先定义的纳入和排除标准对研究进行筛选,通过主题综合对不同健康背景下的研究结果进行分类。
该综述揭示了围绕艾滋病毒/艾滋病、疫苗、制药公司和新冠疫情的普遍阴谋论观念,这些观念与疫苗接种率降低、对卫生当局的不信任增加以及焦虑和抑郁等负面心理健康结果有关。关键驱动因素包括社会政治不信任、认知偏见、科学素养低下以及数字平台上错误信息的无节制传播。有前景的对策包括接种信息宣传、媒体素养干预和双面反驳技术。然而,它们的长期有效性仍不确定,因为很少有研究评估它们在不同社会政治背景下的持续影响。
与健康相关的阴谋论构成了日益严峻的公共卫生挑战,破坏了全球健康公平。虽然一些干预措施显示出潜力,但需要进一步研究以评估它们在不同人群和背景下的有效性。有针对性地努力重建对医疗保健系统的信任并加强关键健康素养,对于减轻这些阴谋论观念的有害影响至关重要。