Garner Andrew R, Fanno Jacob D, McGrath Ryan, Erickson Jacob, Hackney Kyle J
Department of Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.
Department of Human Performance, Sport, and Health, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, MN, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Mar 13;7:1515412. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1515412. eCollection 2025.
This investigation determined if an acute bout of low-load knee extension (KE) with intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) influenced autonomic modulation and skeletal muscle oxygenation (SmO%).
Fourteen physically active males completed three different sessions: one-repetition maximum (1RM), KE with BFR (BFR-KE) at 20% 1RM (cuff pressure=143 ± 13 mmHg), and KE with free blood flow at 20% 1RM (Control-KE). Heart rate variability (HRV) metrics: logarithmically transformed (ln) square root of the mean differences of successive R-R intervals (lnRMSSD), high frequency power (lnHF), and low frequency power (lnLF), as well as SmO%, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured. Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to analyze HRV metrics and SmO%, while a paired -test was used to analyze RPE. A significance level of 0.05 was used for analyses.
From baseline to 15 min post-exercise lnRMSSD decreased in both BFR-KE and Control-KE (4.34 ± 0.43-3.75 ± 0.82 ms, = 0.027). Thereafter, lnRMSSD (+7%), lnHF (+8%), and lnLF (+7%) increased from 15 to 30 min post-exercise in both BFR-KE and Control-KE ( < 0.05). BFR-KE reduced SmO% in the vastus lateralis compared to Control-KE (36% vs. 53%; < 0.001). RPE was greater in BFR-KE (7.0 AU) compared to Control-KE (4.5 AU; 0.001).
Unilateral BFR exercise with individualized cuff pressure and intermittent application facilitated greater localized muscular stress and perceptual effort, but there was no influence of vascular occlusion on post-exercise autonomic modulation compared to volume-matched exercise with free blood flow.
本研究旨在确定一次急性低负荷膝关节伸展(KE)训练结合间歇性血流限制(BFR)是否会影响自主神经调节和骨骼肌氧合(SmO%)。
14名身体活跃的男性完成了三个不同的训练阶段:一次重复最大值(1RM)测试、以1RM的20%进行的带BFR的KE训练(BFR-KE,袖带压力 = 143 ± 13 mmHg)以及以1RM的20%进行的自由血流状态下的KE训练(对照-KE)。测量心率变异性(HRV)指标:连续R-R间期均值差的对数转换平方根(lnRMSSD)、高频功率(lnHF)和低频功率(lnLF),以及SmO%和主观用力感觉评分(RPE)。采用重复测量方差分析来分析HRV指标和SmO%,而采用配对t检验来分析RPE。分析的显著性水平设定为α = 0.05。
从基线到运动后15分钟,BFR-KE和对照-KE组的lnRMSSD均下降(4.34 ± 0.43 - 3.75 ± 0.82 ms,P = 0.027)。此后,在运动后15至30分钟,BFR-KE和对照-KE组的lnRMSSD(+7%)、lnHF(+8%)和lnLF(+7%)均增加(P < 0.05)。与对照-KE相比,BFR-KE降低了股外侧肌的SmO%(36%对53%;P < 0.001)。BFR-KE组的RPE高于对照-KE组(7.0 AU对4.5 AU;P < 0.001)。
采用个体化袖带压力并间歇性应用的单侧BFR训练会导致更大的局部肌肉压力和主观用力程度,但与自由血流的等容量运动相比,血管闭塞对运动后自主神经调节没有影响。