Department of Sport Science, Institute III, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
University of Applied Sciences for Sport and Management Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
J Sports Sci Med. 2024 Jun 1;23(2):326-341. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2024.326. eCollection 2024 Jun.
In the recent past, practical blood flow restriction (pBFR) using non-pneumatic, usually elastic cuffs has been established as a cost-effective alternative to traditional blood flow restriction (BFR) using pneumatic cuffs, especially for training in large groups. This study investigated whether low-load resistance exercise with perceptually primed pBFR using an elastic knee wrap is suitable to induce similar motor performance fatigue as well as physiological and perceptual responses compared to traditional BFR using a pneumatic nylon cuff in males and females. In a randomized, counterbalanced cross-over study, 30 healthy subjects performed 4 sets (30-15-15-15 repetitions) of unilateral knee extensions at 20% of their one-repetition-maximum. In the pBFR condition, each individual was perceptually primed to a BFR pressure corresponding to 60% of their arterial occlusion pressure. Before and after exercise, maximal voluntary torque, maximal muscle activity, and cuff pressure-induced discomfort were assessed. Moreover, physiological (i.e., muscle activity, muscle oxygenation) and perceptual responses (i.e., effort and exercise-induced leg muscle pain) were recorded during exercise. Moderate correlations with no differences between pBFR and BFR were found regarding the decline in maximal voluntary torque and maximal muscle activity. Furthermore, no to very strong correlations between conditions, with no differences, were observed for muscle activity, muscle oxygenation, and perceptual responses during exercise sets. However, cuff pressure-induced discomfort was lower in the pBFR compared to the BFR condition. These results indicate that low-load resistance exercise combined with perceptually primed pBFR is a convenient and less discomfort inducing alternative to traditional BFR. This is especially relevant for BFR training with people who have a low cuff-induced discomfort tolerance.
在最近的一段时间里,使用非气动的、通常是弹性袖带的实际血流限制(pBFR)已经作为使用气动袖带的传统血流限制(BFR)的一种具有成本效益的替代方法得到了确立,特别是对于大群体的训练而言。本研究旨在调查使用弹性膝部包裹带进行的低负荷阻力运动,在感知上进行血流限制(pBFR),与使用气动尼龙袖带进行传统 BFR 相比,是否适合引起类似的运动表现疲劳以及生理和感知反应,无论男性还是女性。在一项随机、交叉对照的研究中,30 名健康受试者进行了 4 组(每组 30-15-15-15 次重复)单侧膝关节伸展运动,负荷为其最大重复次数的 20%。在 pBFR 条件下,每个个体的血流限制压力都被感知到与动脉闭塞压力的 60%相对应。在运动前后,评估了最大自主扭矩、最大肌肉活动和袖带压力引起的不适。此外,还记录了运动期间的生理(即肌肉活动、肌肉氧合)和感知反应(即努力和运动引起的腿部肌肉疼痛)。pBFR 和 BFR 之间的相关性中等,没有差异,在最大自主扭矩和最大肌肉活动的下降方面。此外,在运动组中,观察到肌肉活动、肌肉氧合和感知反应之间的条件之间存在很强的相关性,没有差异。然而,与 BFR 相比,pBFR 引起的袖带压力引起的不适较低。这些结果表明,结合感知血流限制的低负荷阻力运动是传统血流限制的一种方便且不适感较低的替代方法。对于那些对袖带引起的不适容忍度较低的人来说,这一点尤其重要。