Flegge Lindsay G, Estrella Emma, Harris Elizabeth K, Hirsh Adam T, Bushey Michael A
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 20;6:1472160. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1472160. eCollection 2025.
Symptomatic joint hypermobility, as found in conditions like hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), presents unique challenges in pain management due to associated symptoms such as chronic pain, joint instability, and dysautonomia. Despite the high prevalence of hypermobility and associated healthcare costs, there is a lack of research on effective treatments for these patients, particularly in the context of multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs.
This study aims to compare the baseline characteristics, attendance, graduation rates, and patient satisfaction of hypermobile and non-hypermobile adult outpatients participating in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (PRP).
This retrospective cohort study analyzed clinical data from 335 patients at the Indiana University Health Pain Navigation Service between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Baseline characteristics were assessed using patient-reported outcome measures, and attendance and graduation rates were tracked. Hypermobile and non-hypermobile groups were compared with independent samples t-tests and chi-squared tests. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the impact of hypermobility diagnosis on PRP attendance, with pertinent demographic and baseline clinical scores entered as covariates.
Hypermobile patients differed significantly from non-hypermobile patients in demographics, including age, gender, race, education, and employment status. Despite these differences, hypermobile patients did not differ from non-hypermobile patients in PRP attendance or graduation rates. Baseline pain, depression, and pain catastrophizing scores were lower in the hypermobile group. Exit surveys indicated similar levels of overall satisfaction with the program, though hypermobile patients were less likely to report that their needs were fully met than were non-hypermobile patients.
Despite the potential for joint hypermobility to pose a barrier to participation in multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs, we found no evidence that patients with a hypermobile diagnosis had less participation in an intensive outpatient pain rehabilitation program. After accounting for group differences in key demographic and clinical variables, there were no significant differences in PRP attendance between hypermobile and non-hypermobile patients. Our results are encouraging regarding the potential for multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs to serve the needs of these patients.
症状性关节活动过度,如在可活动型埃勒斯-当洛综合征(hEDS)等病症中所见,由于伴有慢性疼痛、关节不稳定和自主神经功能障碍等症状,在疼痛管理方面带来了独特挑战。尽管关节活动过度的患病率很高且相关医疗成本高昂,但针对这些患者的有效治疗方法的研究却很匮乏,尤其是在多学科疼痛康复项目的背景下。
本研究旨在比较参与多学科疼痛康复项目(PRP)的可活动型和不可活动型成年门诊患者的基线特征、出勤率、毕业率和患者满意度。
这项回顾性队列研究分析了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间印第安纳大学健康疼痛导航服务中心335名患者的临床数据。使用患者报告的结局指标评估基线特征,并跟踪出勤率和毕业率。使用独立样本t检验和卡方检验比较可活动型和不可活动型组。使用多元线性回归模型评估关节活动过度诊断对PRP出勤率的影响,并将相关人口统计学和基线临床评分作为协变量纳入。
可活动型患者在人口统计学方面与不可活动型患者有显著差异,包括年龄、性别、种族、教育程度和就业状况。尽管存在这些差异,但可活动型患者在PRP出勤率或毕业率方面与不可活动型患者并无差异。可活动型组的基线疼痛、抑郁和疼痛灾难化评分较低。出院调查显示患者对该项目的总体满意度水平相似,不过可活动型患者报告其需求得到充分满足的可能性低于不可活动型患者。
尽管关节活动过度可能对参与多学科疼痛康复项目构成障碍,但我们没有发现证据表明诊断为关节活动过度的患者较少参与强化门诊疼痛康复项目。在考虑关键人口统计学和临床变量的组间差异后,可活动型和不可活动型患者在PRP出勤率方面没有显著差异。我们的结果对于多学科疼痛康复项目满足这些患者需求的潜力而言是令人鼓舞的。