Nevin Nathan, Boyce David, Gambert Chris, Leff Branden, Batson Andrew, Smith Grant
Physical Therapy Bellarmine University.
Physical Therapy Hanover College.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Apr 1;20(4):553-561. doi: 10.26603/001c.130907. eCollection 2025.
The interest in and use of mechanical percussive massage treatment devices have grown immensely among clinicians and athletes. One purported benefit of these devices is the improvement of range of motion but whether these devices are more effective than traditional means of increasing muscle extensibility remains unexplored.
To examine the effect of mechanical percussive massage therapy applied to the hamstrings versus static stretching of the hamstrings on passive knee extension (PKE) range of motion.
Randomized control trial.
Male Division II NAIA and Division III NCAA football players were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, mechanical percussive massage therapy, or static stretching. Passive hamstring extensibility was quantified in all groups using standard goniometric measurements before and after the intervention by measuring PKE three times in a 90-90 supine position. The mechanical percussive massage therapy group received five minutes of treatment to the hamstrings. The static stretching group received manual stretching of the hamstrings performed in the 90-90 supine position (3 repetitions of 30 seconds with 10-second rest between repetitions). The control group received no treatment. An ANOVA was used to investigate effects of the random interventions.
Seventy-nine male collegiate football players, 37 NCAA Division III and 42 NAIA Division II (mean age 19.8 years +/- 1.2) participated in this study. A significant difference (p < .001) in pre- and post-PKE range of motion was noted for both the percussive mechanical massage therapy (5.8 degrees, SD+/- 3.32) and static stretching (6 degrees, SD+/- 3.29) groups. No significant difference was noted between the two treatment groups. The control group did not demonstrate a significant difference in pre and post-PKE (1.1 degrees, SD +/- 3.62).
Static stretching and mechanical percussive massage therapy applied to the hamstrings produce significant immediate increases in PKE compared to a control group suggesting that static hamstring stretching, and mechanical percussive massage therapy are both viable options for acutely increasing hamstring extensibility.
II.
机械冲击按摩治疗设备在临床医生和运动员中的关注度和使用率大幅增长。这些设备的一个据称的益处是改善活动范围,但这些设备是否比增加肌肉伸展性的传统方法更有效仍未得到探索。
研究对腘绳肌进行机械冲击按摩治疗与对腘绳肌进行静态拉伸对被动膝关节伸展(PKE)活动范围的影响。
随机对照试验。
招募了美国全国大学体育协会(NAIA)二级联赛和三级联赛的男性橄榄球运动员。受试者被随机分配到三组中的一组:对照组、机械冲击按摩治疗组或静态拉伸组。在干预前后,通过在90-90仰卧位测量三次PKE,使用标准测角测量法对所有组的被动腘绳肌伸展性进行量化。机械冲击按摩治疗组对腘绳肌进行5分钟治疗。静态拉伸组在90-90仰卧位进行腘绳肌的手动拉伸(3次重复,每次30秒,重复之间休息10秒)。对照组不接受治疗。使用方差分析来研究随机干预的效果。
79名男性大学橄榄球运动员,37名美国全国大学体育协会三级联赛和42名二级联赛运动员(平均年龄19.8岁±1.2岁)参与了本研究。冲击机械按摩治疗组(5.8度,标准差±3.32)和静态拉伸组(6度,标准差±3.29)的PKE活动范围在治疗前后均有显著差异(p < 0.001)。两个治疗组之间未观察到显著差异。对照组在PKE前后未显示出显著差异(1.1度,标准差±3.62)。
与对照组相比,对腘绳肌进行静态拉伸和机械冲击按摩治疗可使PKE立即显著增加,这表明静态腘绳肌拉伸和机械冲击按摩治疗都是急性增加腘绳肌伸展性的可行选择。
II级。