Suppr超能文献

使用固定正畸矫治器整体内收上颌前牙以关闭拔牙间隙:一项系统评价

En-masse maxillary anterior retraction to close the extraction space with fixed orthodontic appliances: A systematic review.

作者信息

Montasser Ziad M, Scribante Andrea, Zampetti Paolo, Montasser Mona A

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Hours University in Egypt, Damietta, Egypt.

Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Int Orthod. 2025 Sep;23(3):101004. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2025.101004. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evidence on the treatment results and patients' reported outcomes of the en-masse maxillary anterior retraction technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Web of Science™, MEDLINE (via PubMed®), and Scopus electronic databases and reference lists of relevant studies were comprehensively searched on September 24, 2024 with no time frame limitation but, with the language limited to English. Randomized clinical trials investigating en-masse retraction in orthodontic patients who needed maxillary first premolars extraction were selected using keywords to search the titles and abstracts before a detailed reading of each full text in the next steps. Primary outcomes included rate, duration, or amount of anterior retraction and anchorage loss while secondary outcomes included positional changes in the anterior and molar teeth, root resorption of the anterior teeth, and patients' experiences. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used for risk of bias and quality assessment of the included studies.

RESULTS

There were 257 articles deemed potentially suitable for the review. Removing duplicates, careful reading the titles and abstracts, and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria left 22 articles were included. The risk of bias assessment showed 3, 7, and 12 studies of "high", "some concerns" or "low" risk of bias respectively. En-masse retraction produced similar incisor retraction and anchorage loss in about half the time needed by the two-step mechanics. Corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation, and low level laser therapy showed positive results for accelerating en-masse retraction. while piezocision and platelet rich plasma did not. Root resorption of the incisors could increase when using mini-screws, especially infra-zygomatic mini-screws.

CONCLUSIONS

There is need for future RCT on the different outcomes done according to standardized methodologies. Corticotomy, micro-osteoperforation, and low-level laser showed positive results in accelerating en-masse retraction, but the clinical significance remains unclear. Rate of tooth movement was similar in piezocision, platelet-rich plasma, and the control groups. Mini-screws, especially infra-zygomatic mini-screws, increase the chance of root resorption, but the force system arrangement is crucial.

摘要

目的

评估整体上颌前牙后移技术的治疗效果及患者报告结局的相关证据。

材料与方法

于2024年9月24日全面检索了Web of Science™、MEDLINE(通过PubMed®)和Scopus电子数据库以及相关研究的参考文献列表,无时间限制,但语言仅限于英语。使用关键词在标题和摘要中搜索,筛选出研究需要拔除上颌第一前磨牙的正畸患者整体后移的随机临床试验,之后再对每篇全文进行详细阅读。主要结局包括前牙后移的速率、持续时间或量以及支抗丧失,次要结局包括前牙和磨牙的位置变化、前牙牙根吸收以及患者的体验。采用Cochrane协作网偏倚风险工具对纳入研究进行偏倚风险和质量评估。

结果

有257篇文章被认为可能适合该综述。去除重复项、仔细阅读标题和摘要并应用纳入/排除标准后,最终纳入22篇文章。偏倚风险评估显示,分别有3项、7项和12项研究存在“高”、“有一些担忧”或“低”偏倚风险。整体后移在大约两步矫治力学所需时间的一半内产生了相似的切牙后移量和支抗丧失。骨皮质切开术、微骨穿孔术和低强度激光治疗在加速整体后移方面显示出阳性结果,而压电切开术和富血小板血浆则未显示出阳性结果。使用微型螺钉,尤其是颧下微型螺钉时,切牙牙根吸收可能会增加。

结论

未来需要按照标准化方法针对不同结局开展随机对照试验。骨皮质切开术、微骨穿孔术和低强度激光在加速整体后移方面显示出阳性结果,但其临床意义仍不明确。压电切开术、富血小板血浆组和对照组的牙齿移动速率相似。微型螺钉,尤其是颧下微型螺钉,会增加牙根吸收的几率,但力系统的布置至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验