Suppr超能文献

评价上颌前突患者整体内收后支抗丧失情况:使用摩擦与非摩擦机械的随机临床试验。

Evaluation of anchorage loss after en masse retraction in orthodontic patients with maxillary protrusion using friction vs frictionless mechanics: randomized clinical trial.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):532-540. doi: 10.2319/113023-791.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate anchorage loss after en masse retraction in bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion patients using friction vs frictionless mechanics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion needing extraction of upper first premolars and en masse retraction with maximum anchorage were included in this two-arm, parallel, single-center, single-blinded randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio using fully sealed opaque envelopes. Friction group retraction utilized elastomeric power chain between miniscrews and hooks crimped mesial to upper canines on 17 × 25 stainless steel archwire. Frictionless group used customized T-loop springs loading upper first molars indirectly anchored to miniscrews. Activation was every 4 weeks until full retraction. The primary outcome assessed was anchorage loss evaluated at cusp tip and root apex of the first molar. First molar rotation, incisor tip and torque, and root resorption of anterior teeth were evaluated on digital models and cone beam computed tomography taken before and after space closure.

RESULTS

Anchorage loss at crown of first molar was significantly more in frictionless group by 2.1 mm (95% CI = -0.4 to 3.5), (P = .014), while there was no significant difference in anchorage loss at root apex between groups. Significant mesial in molar rotation of 6.672° (95% CI = 12.2-21.2), (P = 0.02) was greater in the frictionless group. Both groups showed comparable tip, torque, and root resorption values. No severe harms were reported. There was mild gingival overgrowth and inflammation in the frictionless group due to T-loop irritation.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra anchorage considerations are needed during en masse retraction when frictionless mechanics is implemented as higher anchorage loss and molar rotation were detected. No difference in tip, torque, and root resorption was observed.

摘要

目的

评估双颌前突患者采用摩擦力与无摩擦力机械行整体后移时的支抗丧失情况。

材料与方法

本研究为双臂、平行、单中心、单盲随机临床试验,采用完全密封不透明信封进行 1:1 分配,共纳入 30 名需要上颌第一前磨牙拔除并采用最大支抗行整体后移的双颌前突患者。摩擦力组使用弹性体动力链,通过微型种植体上的钩和上尖牙近中弯制的曲将磨牙向后拉。无摩擦力组使用定制 T 形圈弹簧,间接在上颌第一磨牙上加载,该磨牙通过微型种植体间接固定。每 4 周激活一次,直到完全后移。主要结局评估是测量第一磨牙颊尖和根尖处的支抗丧失。通过数字模型和锥形束计算机断层扫描评估第一磨牙旋转、切牙切端和转矩以及前牙牙根吸收情况,分别在关闭间隙前和后进行。

结果

无摩擦力组第一磨牙冠部的支抗丧失显著增加 2.1mm(95%CI:-0.4 至 3.5)(P =.014),而两组在根尖处的支抗丧失无显著差异。无摩擦力组磨牙的近中旋转角度显著更大,为 6.672°(95%CI:12.2 至 21.2)(P = 0.02)。两组的切端、转矩和牙根吸收值相似。无严重不良反应报告。无摩擦力组因 T 形圈刺激出现轻度牙龈增生和炎症。

结论

当采用无摩擦力机械时,整体后移时需要额外考虑支抗,因为检测到更高的支抗丧失和磨牙旋转。未观察到切端、转矩和牙根吸收的差异。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
The T-loop in details.T环的详细情况。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Jan;23(1):108-117. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.1.108-117.sar.
10
Mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.用于正畸支抗的微型种植体。
Evid Based Dent. 2017 Oct 27;18(3):82-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401257.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验