Suppr超能文献

阿米卡星与妥布霉素治疗癌症患者感染的比较。

Comparison of amikacin and tobramycin in the treatment of infection in patients with cancer.

作者信息

Feld R, Valdivieso M, Bodey G P, Rodriguez V

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 1977 Jan;135(1):61-6. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.1.61.

Abstract

Two new aminoglycoside antibiotics, tobramycin and amikacin, were compared in a randomized study of the treatment of infections in patients with cancer. For the identified infections, the response rate for tobramycin was 60% and for amikacin was 64%. Pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and septicemia were the most frequent infections. Most (78%) of the identified pathogens were gram-negative bacilli; Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently isolated organisms. When only infections due to gram-negative bacilli were considered, 67% responded to tobramycin and 69% responded to amikacin. All infections except pneumonias had at least a 50% response rate to either antibiotic. The major form of toxicity of both antibiotics was azotemia and occurred in 22% of cases treated with tobramycin and in 20% treated with amikacin. Tobramycin and amikacin are equally effective in the treatment of gram-negative infections and have similar toxicity.

摘要

在一项针对癌症患者感染治疗的随机研究中,对两种新型氨基糖苷类抗生素妥布霉素和阿米卡星进行了比较。对于确诊的感染,妥布霉素的有效率为60%,阿米卡星为64%。肺炎、尿路感染和败血症是最常见的感染。大多数(78%)确诊的病原体为革兰氏阴性杆菌;肺炎克雷伯菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌是最常分离出的微生物。仅考虑由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起的感染时,67%的患者对妥布霉素有反应,69%的患者对阿米卡星有反应。除肺炎外,所有感染对这两种抗生素中任一种的有效率至少为50%。两种抗生素的主要毒性形式均为氮质血症,接受妥布霉素治疗的病例中有22%出现该症状,接受阿米卡星治疗的病例中有20%出现该症状。妥布霉素和阿米卡星在治疗革兰氏阴性感染方面同样有效,且毒性相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验