Suppr超能文献

括约肌间瘘管结扎术(LIFT)真的是一种保留肛门括约肌的肛瘘手术吗?文献综述。

Is the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure truly a sphincter preserving procedure for anal fistula? A scoping review of the literature.

作者信息

Tan Ian Jse-Wei, Siew Bei En, Lau Jerrald, Yap Carol Pei Ling, Soon Stephanie Marie May Ee, Tan Ker-Kan

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 5;30(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02380-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) procedure has garnered popularity with its success rates and purported sphincter-continence preservation. However, there remains a paucity in the literature on the objective evaluation of sphincter integrity and fecal continence after the LIFT procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The present study undertakes a scoping review to systematically explore and map the published literature, to evaluate the sufficiency of data on the impact on continence in patients after the LIFT procedure.

DESIGN

A systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASe, CINAHL was performed from January 2007 to April 2020 and 597 publications were identified. Forty-two satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. We performed a scoping review in accordance to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

RESULTS

Only 3 (7.1%) of publications were randomized controlled trials, of which just 1 (2.4%) measured incontinence as a primary outcome. Continence was measured both pre- and post-LIFT in 30 (71.4%), of which 19 (45.2%) had a fixed protocol for continence assessment, which was heterogeneous between the studies. Continence was assessed using subjective scoring systems in 27 (64.3%) and objective measurement was performed in just 6 (14.3%). No studies performed post-operative anatomical assessment of the anal sphincter complex.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term continence in post-LIFT patients is not supported with adequately powered prospective longitudinal trials using rigorously protocoled pre- and post-operative assessment of continence. Future research that focuses on a combination of objective assessment using anal manometry as well as anatomical assessment of the sphincter complex on top of subjective evaluation is needed before we can be certain if LIFT is indeed a sphincter and continence preserving technique.

摘要

引言

括约肌间瘘管结扎术(LIFT)因其成功率以及据称能保留括约肌功能而受到欢迎。然而,关于LIFT术后括约肌完整性和大便失禁客观评估的文献仍然匮乏。

目的

本研究进行了一项范围综述,以系统地探索和梳理已发表的文献,评估LIFT术后对患者大便失禁影响的数据充分性。

设计

对2007年1月至2020年4月期间的MEDLINE、PubMed、EMBASE和CINAHL进行了系统检索,共识别出597篇出版物。其中42篇符合纳入和排除标准。我们按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行了范围综述。

结果

只有3篇(7.1%)出版物为随机对照试验,其中只有1篇(2.4%)将大便失禁作为主要结局进行测量。30篇(71.4%)在LIFT术前和术后均对大便失禁进行了测量,其中19篇(45.2%)有固定的大便失禁评估方案,但各研究之间存在异质性。27篇(64.3%)使用主观评分系统评估大便失禁,仅6篇(14.3%)进行了客观测量。没有研究对肛门括约肌复合体进行术后解剖学评估。

结论

目前尚无足够有力的前瞻性纵向试验支持LIFT术后患者的长期大便失禁情况,这些试验需采用严格制定的术前和术后大便失禁评估方案。在确定LIFT是否确实是一种保留括约肌和大便失禁功能的技术之前,未来需要开展研究,重点是结合使用肛门测压进行客观评估以及在主观评估基础上对括约肌复合体进行解剖学评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d355/11971777/39c20d0577af/40001_2025_2380_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验