Riddell Michael C, Heller Simon, Carstensen Lisbeth, Rocha Thaís M Pagliaro, Kehlet Watt Sara, Woo Vincent C
Muscle Health Research Centre, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Diabetologia. 2025 Apr 5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-025-06414-6.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Physical activity increases the risk of hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes when basal or basal-bolus insulin therapy is administered. Once-weekly basal insulins may elevate the risk of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemia compared with other basal insulins because the administered levels cannot be reduced in anticipation of increased physical activity. This post hoc analysis of five separate randomised trials (ONWARDS 1-5) aimed to examine physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes in adults with type 2 diabetes receiving either once-weekly basal insulin icodec (herein referred to as 'icodec') or once-daily basal insulins.
The ONWARDS 1-5 Phase 3a randomised controlled trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulin in insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants self-monitored their blood glucose levels using a blood glucose meter and a digital diary. In each trial, suspected hypoglycaemia symptoms triggered additional self-measured blood glucose readings, and values indicative of hypoglycaemia were recorded in the participants' digital diary. Participants who experienced hypoglycaemic episodes were instructed to note any relation of each episode to physical activity. Hypoglycaemic episodes were classified as alert value (level 1: blood glucose <3.9 but ≥3.0 mmol/l), clinically significant (level 2: blood glucose <3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3: cognitive impairment requiring external assistance). The proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity and the ORs of having a physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episode were calculated for the two basal insulin types (once-weekly vs once-daily) for each of the five trials.
Across all trials, there were no consistent differences between icodec and the once-daily insulin comparators in the proportions of hypoglycaemic episodes that were attributed to physical activity; these episodes were mainly alert value or clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes. In both insulin-naive and insulin-experienced participants, the incidence of physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes was consistently ≤3.0% in ONWARDS 1, 2, 3 and 5. In ONWARDS 4, the incidence of physical activity-attributed hypoglycaemic episodes was numerically higher in both treatment groups (18.6% [icodec] vs 17.9% [insulin glargine U100]), which was expected given the basal-bolus insulin regimen. Across all trials, there were no statistically significant differences in the odds of experiencing a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode with icodec vs once-daily insulin comparators. The frequency of recurrent clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was low, with no such episodes in ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5. In contrast, in ONWARDS 2 and 4, the frequency of recurrent clinically significant hypoglycaemic episodes in the 24 h after a physical activity-attributed clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemic episode was numerically higher with icodec vs the once-daily insulin comparators, whilst no additional severe episodes were reported in any participants across the trials.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These findings do not suggest that there is an additional increase in hypoglycaemia risk attributed to physical activity with once-weekly basal icodec vs once-daily basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04460885 (ONWARDS 1), NCT04770532 (ONWARDS 2), NCT04795531 (ONWARDS 3), NCT04880850 (ONWARDS 4) and NCT04760626 (ONWARDS 5).
目的/假设:在接受基础胰岛素或基础-餐时胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中,体育活动会增加低血糖风险。与其他基础胰岛素相比,每周一次的基础胰岛素可能会增加体育活动导致的低血糖风险,因为无法根据体育活动增加的预期来降低给药剂量。这项对五项独立随机试验(ONWARDS 1-5)的事后分析旨在研究接受每周一次基础胰岛素icodec(以下简称“icodec”)或每日一次基础胰岛素的2型糖尿病成人中体育活动导致的低血糖事件。
ONWARDS 1-5 3期a随机对照试验比较了每周一次基础icodec与每日一次基础胰岛素在初治(ONWARDS 1、3和5)和有胰岛素治疗经验(ONWARDS 2和4)的2型糖尿病成人中的疗效和安全性。参与者使用血糖仪和数字日记自我监测血糖水平。在每项试验中,疑似低血糖症状会触发额外的自我测量血糖读数,并将指示低血糖的值记录在参与者的数字日记中。经历过低血糖事件的参与者被要求记录每次事件与体育活动的任何关系。低血糖事件分为警戒值(1级:血糖<3.9但≥3.0 mmol/L)、临床显著(2级:血糖<3.0 mmol/L)或严重(3级:需要外部协助才能认知的损害)。计算五项试验中每种基础胰岛素类型(每周一次与每日一次)归因于体育活动的低血糖事件比例以及发生体育活动导致的低血糖事件的比值比。
在所有试验中,icodec与每日一次胰岛素对照药物在归因于体育活动的低血糖事件比例方面没有一致差异;这些事件主要是警戒值或临床显著低血糖事件。在初治和有胰岛素治疗经验的参与者中,ONWARDS 1、2、3和5中体育活动导致的临床显著或严重低血糖事件发生率始终≤3.0%。在ONWARDS 4中,两个治疗组中体育活动导致的低血糖事件发生率在数值上更高(18.6%[icodec]对17.9%[甘精胰岛素U100]),考虑到基础-餐时胰岛素方案,这是预期的。在所有试验中,icodec与每日一次胰岛素对照药物相比,发生体育活动导致的临床显著或严重低血糖事件的几率没有统计学显著差异。在体育活动导致的临床显著或严重低血糖事件发生后24小时内,复发性临床显著或严重低血糖事件的频率较低,ONWARDS 1、3和5中没有此类事件。相比之下,在ONWARDS 2和4中,与每日一次胰岛素对照药物相比,icodec在体育活动导致的临床显著或严重低血糖事件发生后24小时内复发性临床显著低血糖事件的频率在数值上更高,而在所有试验的任何参与者中均未报告额外的严重事件。
结论/解读:这些发现并不表明在2型糖尿病成人中,与每日一次基础胰岛素相比,每周一次基础icodec会因体育活动而额外增加低血糖风险。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04460885(ONWARDS 1)、NCT04770532(ONWARDS 2)、NCT04795531(ONWARDS 3)、NCT04880850(ONWARDS 4)和NCT04760626(ONWARDS 5)。