• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术与编织型密网支架(Woven EndoBridge)栓塞术治疗未破裂宽颈分叉部颅内动脉瘤的对比分析:一项倾向评分匹配研究

Comparative analysis between stent-assisted coiling and Woven EndoBridge embolization for unruptured wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching study.

作者信息

Chung Kyu Seon, Kim Solbi, Han Hyun Jin, Park Keun Young, Kim Yong Bae, Kim Jung-Jae

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun;136:111204. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111204. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111204
PMID:40186899
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Before the utilization of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBA), stent-assisted coiling (SAC) was the predominant endovascular treatment. Studies directly comparing the outcomes of these two methods are still limited. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of SAC and WEB embolization for unruptured WNBAs through propensity score matching.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients treated with SAC or WEB for unruptured WNBAs at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was conducted based on patient and aneurysm characteristics. The matched groups were compared for periprocedural events and 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale and Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 286 patients, 74 were included in each group after propensity score matching. The WEB group exhibited significantly shorter fluoroscopy time than the SAC group (p < 0.001). Periprocedural complications primarily comprised intraoperative thromboembolic events, with nine cases (12.2 %) in the SAC group and five cases (6.8 %) in the WEB group (p = 0.388). Throughout the 6-month follow-up period, nuisance bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in patients with SAC (8 cases, 10.8 %). The 6-month complete occlusion rates were 85.9 % and 77.5 % for the SAC and WEB groups, respectively (p = 0.309), whereas adequate occlusion rates were 91.5 % and 90.1 % for the groups, respectively (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes of unruptured WNBAs treated with WEB and SAC were comparable. WEB has advantages over SAC, including reduced fluoroscopy time and avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy.

ABSTRACT

Before the utilization of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBA), stent-assisted coiling (SAC) was the predominant endovascular treatment. Studies directly comparing the outcomes of these two methods are still limited. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of SAC and WEB embolization for unruptured WNBAs through propensity score matching. This retrospective study included patients treated with SAC or WEB for unruptured WNBAs at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was conducted based on patient and aneurysm characteristics. The matched groups were compared for periprocedural events and 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale and Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, respectively. Among 286 patients, 74 were included in each group after propensity score matching. The WEB group exhibited significantly shorter fluoroscopy time than the SAC group (p < 0.001). Periprocedural complications primarily comprised intraoperative thromboembolic events, with nine cases (12.2 %) in the SAC group and five cases (6.8 %) in the WEB group (p = 0.388). Throughout the 6-month follow-up period, nuisance bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in patients with SAC (8 cases, 10.8 %). The 6-month complete occlusion rates were 85.9 % and 77.5 % for the SAC and WEB groups, respectively (p = 0.309), whereas adequate occlusion rates were 91.5 % and 90.1 % for the groups, respectively (p = 1.000). The 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes of unruptured WNBAs treated with WEB and SAC were comparable. WEB has advantages over SAC, including reduced fluoroscopy time and avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy.

摘要

背景

在使用编织型血管内桥接器(WEB)治疗宽颈分叉颅内动脉瘤(WNBA)之前,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)是主要的血管内治疗方法。直接比较这两种方法疗效的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配比较SAC和WEB栓塞术治疗未破裂WNBA的安全性和有效性。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2023年6月期间在单一机构接受SAC或WEB治疗未破裂WNBA的患者。根据患者和动脉瘤特征进行倾向评分匹配。对匹配组的围手术期事件以及6个月的临床和影像学结果进行比较,分别使用改良Rankin量表和Raymond-Roy闭塞分级进行评估。

结果

286例患者中,倾向评分匹配后每组各纳入74例。WEB组的透视时间明显短于SAC组(p < 0.001)。围手术期并发症主要包括术中血栓栓塞事件,SAC组有9例(12.2%),WEB组有5例(6.8%)(p = 0.388)。在整个6个月的随访期内,SAC患者中出现烦扰性出血的频率明显更高(8例,10.8%)。SAC组和WEB组的6个月完全闭塞率分别为85.9%和77.5%(p = 0.309),而两组的充分闭塞率分别为91.5%和90.1%(p = 1.000)。

结论

WEB和SAC治疗未破裂WNBA的6个月临床和影像学结果具有可比性。WEB比SAC具有优势,包括透视时间缩短和避免双重抗血小板治疗。

摘要

在使用编织型血管内桥接器(WEB)治疗宽颈分叉颅内动脉瘤(WNBA)之前,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)是主要的血管内治疗方法。直接比较这两种方法疗效的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配比较SAC和WEB栓塞术治疗未破裂WNBA的安全性和有效性。这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2023年6月期间在单一机构接受SAC或WEB治疗未破裂WNBA的患者。根据患者和动脉瘤特征进行倾向评分匹配。对匹配组的围手术期事件以及6个月的临床和影像学结果进行比较,分别使用改良Rankin量表和Raymond-Roy闭塞分级进行评估。286例患者中,倾向评分匹配后每组各纳入74例。WEB组的透视时间明显短于SAC组(p < 0.001)。围手术期并发症主要包括术中血栓栓塞事件,SAC组有9例(12.2%),WEB组有5例(6.8%)(p = 0.388)。在整个6个月的随访期内,SAC患者中出现烦扰性出血的频率明显更高(8例,10.8%)。SAC组和WEB组的6个月完全闭塞率分别为85.9%和77.5%(p = 0.309),而两组的充分闭塞率分别为91.5%和90.1%(p = 1.000)。WEB和SAC治疗未破裂WNBA的6个月临床和影像学结果具有可比性。WEB比SAC具有优势,包括透视时间缩短和避免双重抗血小板治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparative analysis between stent-assisted coiling and Woven EndoBridge embolization for unruptured wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms: A propensity score matching study.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术与编织型密网支架(Woven EndoBridge)栓塞术治疗未破裂宽颈分叉部颅内动脉瘤的对比分析:一项倾向评分匹配研究
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun;136:111204. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111204. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Comparative effectiveness of stent-assisted coiling and Woven EndoBridge embolization for the treatment of unruptured wide-neck bifurcation intracranial aneurysms.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术与编织型密网支架栓塞术治疗未破裂宽颈分叉部颅内动脉瘤的疗效比较
J Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 4;138(6):1487-1493. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.JNS221138. Print 2023 Jun 1.
3
Comparison of WEB Embolization and Coiling in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Safety and Efficacy Based on a Propensity Score Analysis.未破裂颅内动脉瘤 WEB 栓塞与弹簧圈栓塞的比较:基于倾向评分分析的安全性和疗效。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e937-e943. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
4
Comparison between Woven EndoBridge and coiling with and without stent assistance for intracranial bifurcation and wide-neck aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.编织式支架辅助血流导向密网支架置入与单纯支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗颅内分叉部及宽颈动脉瘤的对比:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg. 2024 May 10;141(4):1026-1039. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.JNS232531. Print 2024 Oct 1.
5
Woven Endobridge Embolization Versus Microsurgical Clipping for Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Propensity Score Analysis.血管内编织式 Endobridge 栓塞术与显微夹闭术治疗未破裂前循环动脉瘤的对比:倾向评分分析。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Mar 15;88(4):779-784. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa539.
6
WEB embolization versus stent-assisted coiling: comparison of complication rates and angiographic outcomes.WEB 栓塞与支架辅助栓塞:并发症发生率和血管造影结果比较。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Aug;11(8):812-816. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014555. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
7
Flow diverters versus stent-assisted coiling in unruptured intracranial vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms.未破裂颅内椎动脉夹层动脉瘤的血流导向装置与支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的比较
J Neurosurg. 2023 Oct 13;140(4):1064-1070. doi: 10.3171/2023.7.JNS23444. Print 2024 Apr 1.
8
The use of single low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent-assisted coiling in the treatment of middle cerebral artery bifurcation unruptured wide-necked aneurysm.采用单枚低剖面可视化腔内支撑支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗大脑中动脉分叉未破裂宽颈动脉瘤。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Aug;26(4):461-467. doi: 10.1177/1591019920901925. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Endovascular treatment of unruptured wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: comparison of dual microcatheter technique and stent-assisted coil embolization.未破裂宽颈颅内动脉瘤的血管内治疗:双微导管技术与支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术的比较
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Apr;7(4):256-61. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011159. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Stent plus balloon-assisted coiling with low-profile braided stents in the treatment of complex wide-necked intracranial bifurcation aneurysms.支架辅助球囊成形术联合微导管编织支架治疗复杂宽颈颅内分叉部动脉瘤。
Neuroradiol J. 2024 Oct;37(5):603-610. doi: 10.1177/19714009241247462. Epub 2024 Apr 15.