Chung Kyu Seon, Kim Solbi, Han Hyun Jin, Park Keun Young, Kim Yong Bae, Kim Jung-Jae
Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun;136:111204. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111204. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
Before the utilization of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBA), stent-assisted coiling (SAC) was the predominant endovascular treatment. Studies directly comparing the outcomes of these two methods are still limited. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of SAC and WEB embolization for unruptured WNBAs through propensity score matching.
This retrospective study included patients treated with SAC or WEB for unruptured WNBAs at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was conducted based on patient and aneurysm characteristics. The matched groups were compared for periprocedural events and 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale and Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, respectively.
Among 286 patients, 74 were included in each group after propensity score matching. The WEB group exhibited significantly shorter fluoroscopy time than the SAC group (p < 0.001). Periprocedural complications primarily comprised intraoperative thromboembolic events, with nine cases (12.2 %) in the SAC group and five cases (6.8 %) in the WEB group (p = 0.388). Throughout the 6-month follow-up period, nuisance bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in patients with SAC (8 cases, 10.8 %). The 6-month complete occlusion rates were 85.9 % and 77.5 % for the SAC and WEB groups, respectively (p = 0.309), whereas adequate occlusion rates were 91.5 % and 90.1 % for the groups, respectively (p = 1.000).
The 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes of unruptured WNBAs treated with WEB and SAC were comparable. WEB has advantages over SAC, including reduced fluoroscopy time and avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy.
Before the utilization of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation intracranial aneurysms (WNBA), stent-assisted coiling (SAC) was the predominant endovascular treatment. Studies directly comparing the outcomes of these two methods are still limited. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of SAC and WEB embolization for unruptured WNBAs through propensity score matching. This retrospective study included patients treated with SAC or WEB for unruptured WNBAs at a single institution between January 2014 and June 2023. Propensity score matching was conducted based on patient and aneurysm characteristics. The matched groups were compared for periprocedural events and 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale and Raymond-Roy occlusion classification, respectively. Among 286 patients, 74 were included in each group after propensity score matching. The WEB group exhibited significantly shorter fluoroscopy time than the SAC group (p < 0.001). Periprocedural complications primarily comprised intraoperative thromboembolic events, with nine cases (12.2 %) in the SAC group and five cases (6.8 %) in the WEB group (p = 0.388). Throughout the 6-month follow-up period, nuisance bleeding occurred significantly more frequently in patients with SAC (8 cases, 10.8 %). The 6-month complete occlusion rates were 85.9 % and 77.5 % for the SAC and WEB groups, respectively (p = 0.309), whereas adequate occlusion rates were 91.5 % and 90.1 % for the groups, respectively (p = 1.000). The 6-month clinical and radiological outcomes of unruptured WNBAs treated with WEB and SAC were comparable. WEB has advantages over SAC, including reduced fluoroscopy time and avoidance of dual antiplatelet therapy.
在使用编织型血管内桥接器(WEB)治疗宽颈分叉颅内动脉瘤(WNBA)之前,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)是主要的血管内治疗方法。直接比较这两种方法疗效的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配比较SAC和WEB栓塞术治疗未破裂WNBA的安全性和有效性。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2023年6月期间在单一机构接受SAC或WEB治疗未破裂WNBA的患者。根据患者和动脉瘤特征进行倾向评分匹配。对匹配组的围手术期事件以及6个月的临床和影像学结果进行比较,分别使用改良Rankin量表和Raymond-Roy闭塞分级进行评估。
286例患者中,倾向评分匹配后每组各纳入74例。WEB组的透视时间明显短于SAC组(p < 0.001)。围手术期并发症主要包括术中血栓栓塞事件,SAC组有9例(12.2%),WEB组有5例(6.8%)(p = 0.388)。在整个6个月的随访期内,SAC患者中出现烦扰性出血的频率明显更高(8例,10.8%)。SAC组和WEB组的6个月完全闭塞率分别为85.9%和77.5%(p = 0.309),而两组的充分闭塞率分别为91.5%和90.1%(p = 1.000)。
WEB和SAC治疗未破裂WNBA的6个月临床和影像学结果具有可比性。WEB比SAC具有优势,包括透视时间缩短和避免双重抗血小板治疗。
在使用编织型血管内桥接器(WEB)治疗宽颈分叉颅内动脉瘤(WNBA)之前,支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术(SAC)是主要的血管内治疗方法。直接比较这两种方法疗效的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配比较SAC和WEB栓塞术治疗未破裂WNBA的安全性和有效性。这项回顾性研究纳入了2014年1月至2023年6月期间在单一机构接受SAC或WEB治疗未破裂WNBA的患者。根据患者和动脉瘤特征进行倾向评分匹配。对匹配组的围手术期事件以及6个月的临床和影像学结果进行比较,分别使用改良Rankin量表和Raymond-Roy闭塞分级进行评估。286例患者中,倾向评分匹配后每组各纳入74例。WEB组的透视时间明显短于SAC组(p < 0.001)。围手术期并发症主要包括术中血栓栓塞事件,SAC组有9例(12.2%),WEB组有5例(6.8%)(p = 0.388)。在整个6个月的随访期内,SAC患者中出现烦扰性出血的频率明显更高(8例,10.8%)。SAC组和WEB组的6个月完全闭塞率分别为85.9%和77.5%(p = 0.309),而两组的充分闭塞率分别为91.5%和90.1%(p = 1.000)。WEB和SAC治疗未破裂WNBA的6个月临床和影像学结果具有可比性。WEB比SAC具有优势,包括透视时间缩短和避免双重抗血小板治疗。