Othman Amr A, Sadek Abdelrahim A, Ahmed Esraa A, Abdelkreem Elsayed
Neuropsychiatry Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Pediatr Neurol. 2025 Jun;167:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2025.03.011. Epub 2025 Mar 22.
Approximately one third of children with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) are not controlled by initial benzodiazepine therapy. We investigated the efficacy of adding ketamine to midazolam for first-line treatment of pediatric GCSE.
This randomized controlled trial included 144 children with GCSE aged between six months and 16 years, who were equally randomized to receive ketamine plus midazolam (Ket-Mid group) or placebo plus midazolam (Pla-Mid group). Primary outcome was cessation of clinical seizures at five-minute study timepoint. Secondary outcomes were the need for a second midazolam bolus; cessation of clinical seizures at 15-, 35-, and 55-minute timepoints; 24-hour seizure control; and adverse effects.
Cessation of clinical seizures at five-minute occurred in 76% of children in the Ket-Mid group compared with 21% in the Pla-Mid group (risk ratio [RR] 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-5.9; P < 0.001). Compared with the Pla-Mid group, the Ket-Mid group had higher percentages of seizure cessation at 15-minute (76.4% vs 23.6%; RR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.1-5.0), 35-minute (83.3% vs 45.8%; RR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.4), and 55-minute (88.9% vs 72.2%; RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.04-1.45) study timepoints as well as lower percentages of repeating midazolam (23.6% vs 79.2%; RR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.19-0.46) and endotracheal intubation (4.2% vs 20.8%; RR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.06-0.66). Both groups showed no significant differences in other outcome measures.
Ketamine-midazolam combination may be more effective than midazolam alone for the initial treatment of pediatric GCSE, but this should be confirmed in future research.
约三分之一的全面性惊厥性癫痫持续状态(GCSE)患儿初始苯二氮䓬类药物治疗无效。我们研究了氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑用于小儿GCSE一线治疗的疗效。
这项随机对照试验纳入了144名年龄在6个月至16岁之间的GCSE患儿,将他们随机分为两组,分别接受氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑(氯胺酮-咪达唑仑组)或安慰剂联合咪达唑仑(安慰剂-咪达唑仑组)。主要结局是在研究5分钟时间点临床癫痫发作停止。次要结局包括是否需要第二次注射咪达唑仑;在15、35和55分钟时间点临床癫痫发作停止情况;24小时癫痫控制情况;以及不良反应。
氯胺酮-咪达唑仑组76%的患儿在5分钟时临床癫痫发作停止,而安慰剂-咪达唑仑组为21%(风险比[RR] 3.7;95%置信区间[CI] 2.3 - 5.9;P < 0.001)。与安慰剂-咪达唑仑组相比,氯胺酮-咪达唑仑组在15分钟(76.4%对23.6%;RR,3.2;95% CI,2.1 - 5.0)、35分钟(83.3%对45.8%;RR,1.8;95% CI,1.4 - 2.4)和55分钟(88.9%对72.2%;RR,1.2;95% CI,1.04 - 1.45)研究时间点癫痫发作停止的比例更高,重复使用咪达唑仑(23.6%对79.2%;RR,0.3;95% CI,0.19 - 0.46)和气管插管(4.2%对20.8%;RR,0.2;95% CI,0.06 - 0.66)的比例更低。两组在其他结局指标上无显著差异。
氯胺酮-咪达唑仑联合用药在小儿GCSE初始治疗中可能比单用咪达唑仑更有效,但这一点有待未来研究证实。