• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宗教行为体在推动可持续未来方面的多重作用。

The multiple roles of religious actors in advancing a sustainable future.

作者信息

Koehrsen Jens, Ives Christopher D

机构信息

Centre for Religion, Economy, and Politics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Theological Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Ambio. 2025 Aug;54(8):1318-1333. doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0. Epub 2025 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0
PMID:40188199
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12214149/
Abstract

Religious actors have great potential for influencing transformation processes toward environmentally sustainable societies. Influencing peoples' worldviews, values, and group norms, they can promote (or block) pro-environmental attitudes, lifestyles, and political decision-making. Yet, current scholarship is ambivalent about religion's contribution to environmental sustainability. This perspective article outlines various roles religious actors can assume in sustainability transitions. We suggest a systematization of four roles-(1) pioneering, (2) path-following, (3) passive observing, and (4) prohibiting change-and portray five conditions that influence and catalyze these roles-(a) theological commitment, (b) internal support, (c) resources, (d) social and political influence, and (e) wider societal conditions. Generating this conceptual clarity is crucial as it allows researchers and policy actors to recognize the diversity of religious expressions with respect to sustainability action, and grasp the conditions under which religious actors are best equipped to address sustainability challenges.

摘要

宗教行为体在推动向环境可持续型社会转型的过程中具有巨大潜力。它们能够影响人们的世界观、价值观和群体规范,进而促进(或阻碍)亲环境的态度、生活方式以及政治决策。然而,当前学术界对于宗教对环境可持续性的贡献态度不一。这篇观点文章概述了宗教行为体在可持续发展转型中可以扮演的各种角色。我们建议将其系统化为四个角色:(1)开拓型,(2)跟随型,(3)被动观察型,以及(4)禁止变革型,并描述影响和催化这些角色的五个条件:(a)神学承诺,(b)内部支持,(c)资源,(d)社会和政治影响力,以及(e)更广泛的社会条件。形成这种概念上的清晰认识至关重要,因为它能让研究人员和政策行为体认识到宗教在可持续发展行动方面表现形式的多样性,并把握宗教行为体最有能力应对可持续发展挑战的条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/f98baa37508f/13280_2025_2166_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/a6799886d57d/13280_2025_2166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/03b75ae278e6/13280_2025_2166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/f98baa37508f/13280_2025_2166_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/a6799886d57d/13280_2025_2166_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/03b75ae278e6/13280_2025_2166_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e464/12214149/f98baa37508f/13280_2025_2166_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The multiple roles of religious actors in advancing a sustainable future.宗教行为体在推动可持续未来方面的多重作用。
Ambio. 2025 Aug;54(8):1318-1333. doi: 10.1007/s13280-025-02166-0. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
2
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
3
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
4
An Occupational Science Contribution to Camouflaging Scholarship: Centering Intersectional Experiences of Occupational Disruptions.职业科学对伪装学术的贡献:以职业中断的交叉经历为中心
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):238-248. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0070. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
8
Integrating science and business models of sustainability for environmentally-challenging industries such as secondary lead smelters: a systematic review and analysis of findings.将可持续性的科学和商业模式整合到面临环境挑战的行业中,例如二次铅冶炼厂:系统回顾和分析研究结果。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Sep;91(9):1872-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 23.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
When concern is not enough: Overcoming the climate awareness-action gap.当关注还不够时:克服气候意识与行动之间的差距。
Ambio. 2024 Aug;53(8):1182-1202. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-01999-5. Epub 2024 May 6.
2
Claiming ecological grief: Why are we not mourning (more and more publicly) for ecological destruction?主张生态悲痛:为什么我们不为生态破坏(越来越公开地)哀悼?
Ambio. 2024 Apr;53(4):552-564. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01962-w. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Evolution of the polycrisis: Anthropocene traps that challenge global sustainability.
多元危机的演变:挑战全球可持续性的人类世陷阱。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Jan;379(1893):20220261. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0261. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Navigating polycrisis: long-run socio-cultural factors shape response to changing climate.应对多重危机:长期的社会文化因素塑造了对气候变化的应对方式。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 6;378(1889):20220402. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0402. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
5
Fractal approaches to scaling transformations to sustainability.分形方法在可持续性中的尺度变换。
Ambio. 2023 Sep;52(9):1448-1461. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01873-w. Epub 2023 May 19.
6
Activating faith: pro-environmental responses to a Christian text on sustainability.激活信仰:对一篇关于可持续性的基督教文本的亲环境回应。
Sustain Sci. 2023;18(2):877-890. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01197-w. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
7
Country-level factors in a failing relationship with nature: Nature connectedness as a key metric for a sustainable future.国家层面与自然关系恶化的因素:自然关联度是可持续未来的关键指标。
Ambio. 2022 Nov;51(11):2201-2213. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01744-w. Epub 2022 May 31.
8
Earth stewardship: Shaping a sustainable future through interacting policy and norm shifts.地球管理:通过互动的政策和规范转变塑造可持续的未来。
Ambio. 2022 Sep;51(9):1907-1920. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01721-3. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
9
Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth's climate by 2050.通过社会 tipping 动态实现 2050 年稳定地球气候的目标。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 4;117(5):2354-2365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900577117. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
10
Inside-out sustainability: The neglect of inner worlds.内外兼顾的可持续性:忽视内在世界。
Ambio. 2020 Jan;49(1):208-217. doi: 10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w. Epub 2019 Apr 24.