Weatherall Mark W
Stoke Mandeville Hospital, Aylesbury, UK.
Med Hist. 2025 Jan;69(1):166-182. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2024.35. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
This paper provides an account of a specific operation - the removal of the thymus gland (thymectomy) to treat the rare neurological condition myasthenia gravis - from its first performance in 1936, by the American surgeon Alfred Blalock, to the publication in 2016 of an international multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the technique. Thymectomy was the subject of a transatlantic controversy in the 1950s, in which the main players were the English surgeon Geoffrey Keynes, and American neurologists and surgeons from New York, Boston, and the Mayo Clinic. The resolution of this controversy involved the use of increasingly sophisticated statistical techniques, but also crucially other influences including the social transformation of thoracic surgery, and competition between the leading American centres. The consensus achieved after this controversy was challenged in the late 1970s, eventually prompting the implementation of a trial acceptable to twenty-first-century evidence-based medicine. This account will demonstrate that surgical innovation in the period covered required increasing attention to the statistical basis of patient selection and outcome evaluation; that the processes of technical innovation cannot be regarded as separate from developments in the professional culture of surgery, and that one of the consequences of these changes has been the gradual eclipse of the prestigious autonomous surgeon.
本文讲述了一种特定的手术——切除胸腺(胸腺切除术)以治疗罕见的神经系统疾病重症肌无力,从1936年美国外科医生阿尔弗雷德·布莱洛克首次实施该手术,到2016年该技术的一项国际多中心随机对照试验(RCT)发表的历程。胸腺切除术在20世纪50年代引发了一场跨大西洋的争论,主要参与者是英国外科医生杰弗里·凯恩斯,以及来自纽约、波士顿和梅奥诊所的美国神经科医生和外科医生。这场争论的解决涉及到越来越复杂的统计技术的应用,但关键还包括其他影响因素,如胸外科的社会变革以及美国主要中心之间的竞争。20世纪70年代末,这场争论达成的共识受到了挑战,最终促使开展了一项符合21世纪循证医学要求的试验。本文将表明,在所涵盖的时期内,外科创新需要越来越关注患者选择和结果评估的统计基础;技术创新过程不能被视为与外科专业文化的发展相分离,并且这些变化的后果之一是享有盛誉的自主外科医生逐渐失势。