Corpodean Florina, Kachmar Michael, Doiron Jake, Danos Denise, Cook Michael W, Schauer Philip R, Albaugh Vance L
Metamor Institute, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Department of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Aug;21(8):935-942. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.03.003. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
Postoperative emergency department (ED) use and readmissions are key quality outcome measures for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers. Given increasing costs, limiting postoperative resource use is of paramount importance.
This study aimed to investigate disparities in postoperative resource use after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) across primary payor status.
Two MBSAQIP-accredited centers.
Using data from our institutional MBSAQIP dataset (2020-2023), MBS cases were identified and categorized on the basis of primary payor type. Analysis of 30-day readmissions, reinterventions, and reoperations was performed on the basis of case characteristics and stratified by payor status to examine intergroup differences.
Medicaid beneficiaries were overall younger (40.4 years versus 46.5 years; P < .05) than patients with private insurance (PI) and more likely to be female. Body mass index was significantly greater for Medicaid compared with PI or Medicare (49.8 versus 47.8 versus 48.2; P < .05). Medicaid recipients had significantly greater rates of ED use (P < .0001) compared with PI and self-pay and longer operative times compared with PI and Self-Pay (144.8 min versus 126.7 versus 108.1 min; P < .05). Patients with Medicaid status also had a longer length of stay than patients with PI (1.68 days versus 1.48 days, P < .05). Despite these differences, Medicaid status was not associated with increased composite complications, composite infection, length of stay >5 days, or readmission.
Postoperative ED use and readmission/reoperation rates were notably higher in publicly insured (Medicare or Medicaid) patients compared with those with PI or self-pay. This highlights the importance of implementing targeted quality improvement measures to improve access to care in this population.
术后急诊科(ED)就诊和再入院是代谢与减重手术认证及质量改进项目(MBSAQIP)中心关键的质量结果指标。鉴于成本不断增加,限制术后资源使用至关重要。
本研究旨在调查代谢与减重手术(MBS)后,不同主要支付方状态下术后资源使用的差异。
两家获得MBSAQIP认证的中心。
利用我们机构MBSAQIP数据集(2020 - 2023年)的数据,根据主要支付方类型识别并分类MBS病例。基于病例特征对30天再入院、再次干预和再次手术进行分析,并按支付方状态分层,以检查组间差异。
与私人保险(PI)患者相比,医疗补助受益人的总体年龄更小(40.4岁对46.5岁;P < 0.05),且更可能为女性。与PI或医疗保险相比,医疗补助患者的体重指数显著更高(49.8对47.8对48.2;P < 0.05)。与PI和自费患者相比,医疗补助接受者的ED就诊率显著更高(P < 0.0001),且手术时间比PI和自费患者更长(144.8分钟对126.7分钟对108.1分钟;P < 0.05)。医疗补助状态的患者住院时间也比PI患者更长(1.68天对1.48天,P < 0.05)。尽管存在这些差异,但医疗补助状态与复合并发症增加、复合感染、住院时间>5天或再入院无关。
与PI或自费患者相比,公共保险(医疗保险或医疗补助)患者的术后ED就诊率和再入院/再次手术率明显更高。这凸显了实施有针对性的质量改进措施以改善该人群医疗服务可及性的重要性。