Grieco Arielle, Ko Clifford Y, Brethauer Stacy A, Petrick Anthony T
American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois.
American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Surgery, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Jul;21(7):752-759. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
There was a call for research regarding safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. Payor status may be an indicator of both health and socioeconomic status.
The American College of Surgeons Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) sought to explore the association of insurance type in U.S. patients receiving primary bariatric surgery on both postoperative risks and benefits.
Not-for-profit organization, clinical data registry.
MBSAQIP data from primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) cases performed in 2021 along with follow-up records through 18 months postoperatively were included (N = 156,046). All analyses were stratified by age (<65 years, n = 149,949; ≥65 years, n = 6097). Hierarchical logistic regression models for 30-day adverse events, and longitudinal models for percent total weight loss and cox regression models for mortality and comorbidity remission rates through 1 year were performed.
Among those <65 years, Medicare patients showed greatest risk for 30-day postoperative complications followed by Medicaid, private insurance, and self-pay patients aligning with preoperative risk profiles. Private insurance holders <65 years lose 1.5% more of their total preoperative weight and show greater rates of comorbidity remission at 12 months than Medicare patients. Across all payor groups <65 years, scenario-based survival probabilities through 1-year are ∼99%, 25% total weight loss or greater is realized, and 33% to over 75% of those with respective comorbidities experience remission. No meaningful payor status differences were noted among those ≥65 years.
Payor status may be an indicator of both health and socioeconomic status, where traditional risk adjustment is inappropriate. Results reinforce these complex relationships, but also prove immense benefits of bariatric surgery regardless of payor type.
有人呼吁开展关于医疗保险受益人群中减肥手术安全性和有效性的研究。支付方身份可能是健康状况和社会经济地位的一个指标。
美国外科医师学会代谢和减肥手术认证与质量改进项目(MBSAQIP)旨在探讨美国接受初次减肥手术患者的保险类型与术后风险和益处之间的关联。
非营利组织,临床数据登记处。
纳入2021年进行的初次腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)病例的MBSAQIP数据以及术后18个月的随访记录(N = 156,046)。所有分析按年龄分层(<65岁,n = 149,949;≥65岁,n = 6097)。进行了30天不良事件的分层逻辑回归模型、总体体重减轻百分比的纵向模型以及1年内死亡率和合并症缓解率的Cox回归模型。
在<65岁的人群中,医疗保险患者术后30天并发症风险最高,其次是医疗补助患者、私人保险患者和自费患者,这与术前风险状况相符。<65岁的私人保险持有者比医疗保险患者术前总体重多减轻1.5%,且在12个月时合并症缓解率更高。在所有<65岁的支付方组中,1年的基于情景的生存概率约为99%,实现了25%或更多的总体重减轻,33%至超过75%的相应合并症患者病情缓解。≥65岁的人群中未发现有意义的支付方身份差异。
支付方身份可能是健康状况和社会经济地位的一个指标,在此情况下传统的风险调整并不适用。研究结果强化了这些复杂关系,但也证明了无论支付方类型如何,减肥手术都有巨大益处。