Suppr超能文献

气囊扩张术治疗贲门失弛缓症。

Pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia.

作者信息

Monges B, Grimaud J C, Richieri J P, Botti G, Salducci J

出版信息

Int Surg. 1985 Jan-Mar;70(1):17-21.

PMID:4019080
Abstract

The results of a European survey on pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia have been compiled from a questionnaire completed by 18 different surgical teams. The total number of patients investigated was 2,161. Surgical treatment was prescribed by 94% of teams, whereas pneumatic dilatation was only prescribed by 56%. The indications for pneumatic dilatation were: inoperability (28%), drug failure (17%), surgical failure (11%). Nine surgeons believe pneumatic dilatation is indicated in all cases (50%), four consider it ineffective and useless (22%), and one expressed no opinion (6%). The arguments in favour of pneumatic dilatation are the fact that the procedure is minor and cost efficient and that it is relatively safe and effective with good long-term results in 75% of cases. Pneumatic dilatation should be used as the initial treatment in achalasia; surgery is only indicated in cases of failure.

摘要

一项关于贲门失弛缓症治疗中气囊扩张术的欧洲调查结果,是根据18个不同外科团队填写的问卷汇总而成。接受调查的患者总数为2161例。94%的团队采用手术治疗,而只有56%的团队采用气囊扩张术。气囊扩张术的适应证为:无法手术(28%)、药物治疗失败(17%)、手术失败(11%)。9名外科医生认为在所有病例中都应采用气囊扩张术(50%),4名认为其无效且无用(22%),1名未发表意见(6%)。支持气囊扩张术的理由是该操作简单、成本效益高,并且相对安全有效,75%的病例长期效果良好。气囊扩张术应作为贲门失弛缓症的初始治疗方法;仅在治疗失败的情况下才考虑手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验