Monges B, Grimaud J C, Richieri J P, Botti G, Salducci J
Int Surg. 1985 Jan-Mar;70(1):17-21.
The results of a European survey on pneumatic dilatation in the treatment of achalasia have been compiled from a questionnaire completed by 18 different surgical teams. The total number of patients investigated was 2,161. Surgical treatment was prescribed by 94% of teams, whereas pneumatic dilatation was only prescribed by 56%. The indications for pneumatic dilatation were: inoperability (28%), drug failure (17%), surgical failure (11%). Nine surgeons believe pneumatic dilatation is indicated in all cases (50%), four consider it ineffective and useless (22%), and one expressed no opinion (6%). The arguments in favour of pneumatic dilatation are the fact that the procedure is minor and cost efficient and that it is relatively safe and effective with good long-term results in 75% of cases. Pneumatic dilatation should be used as the initial treatment in achalasia; surgery is only indicated in cases of failure.
一项关于贲门失弛缓症治疗中气囊扩张术的欧洲调查结果,是根据18个不同外科团队填写的问卷汇总而成。接受调查的患者总数为2161例。94%的团队采用手术治疗,而只有56%的团队采用气囊扩张术。气囊扩张术的适应证为:无法手术(28%)、药物治疗失败(17%)、手术失败(11%)。9名外科医生认为在所有病例中都应采用气囊扩张术(50%),4名认为其无效且无用(22%),1名未发表意见(6%)。支持气囊扩张术的理由是该操作简单、成本效益高,并且相对安全有效,75%的病例长期效果良好。气囊扩张术应作为贲门失弛缓症的初始治疗方法;仅在治疗失败的情况下才考虑手术。