Suppr超能文献

正念疗法与认知行为疗法对阿片类药物治疗的慢性下腰痛的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验

Mindfulness vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain Treated With Opioids: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Zgierska Aleksandra E, Edwards Robert R, Barrett Bruce, Burzinski Cindy A, Jamison Robert N, Nakamura Yoshio, Henningfield Mary F, Tuan Wen-Jan, Shen Chan, Sehgal Nalini, Lennon Robert P, Dong Huamei, Chinchilli Vernon M, Liu Yuxin, Turnquist Alyssa, Schiefelbein Anthony R, Jacobs Elizabeth A, Veasley Christin, Cowan Penney, Garland Eric L

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3204.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can necessitate opioid therapy. Effective approaches to reduce CLBP's symptoms and opioid-related harms are needed. Cognitive behavioral (CBT) and mindfulness-based (MBT) therapies may be useful but have not been well-studied for opioid-treated CLBP.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of MBT vs CBT in opioid-treated CLBP, hypothesizing MBT's superiority.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this 12-month community partner-informed, partially masked, multisite, randomized clinical trial, participants at primary and specialty care clinics and community settings were randomly assigned (1:1) to MBT or CBT groups. Participants included English-fluent adults (21 years or older), without prior MBT or CBT training, and with moderate-to-severe CLBP (average score ≥3 on the Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]; functional limitation score ≥20 on the Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), treated with an opioid dosage of at least 15 mg/d of morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for at least 3 months. Outcome data were collected from July 1, 2017, to November 23, 2022. Analysis used the intention-to-treat approach.

INTERVENTIONS

Manual-based MBT or CBT interventions consisting of 8 weekly therapist-led group sessions and at-home practice.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Self-reported coprimary (average pain severity, 0-10 [BPI]; functional limitations, 0-100 [ODI]) and secondary (mental and physical health-related quality of life [QOL] on the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey and opioid dose in MME per day, Timeline Followback) outcomes compared at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Among 6024 screened individuals, 2926 were ineligible, 2328 were eligible, and 770 were enrolled, including 385 in the MBT and 385 in the CBT groups. Of these, 434 participants (56.4%) were female, 647 (84.0%) identified as non-Hispanic ethnicity, and 630 (81.8%) identified as White race; mean (SD) age was 57.8 (11.3) years. The mean (SD) BPI average pain score was 6.1 (1.6) (moderate pain) and the mean (SD) ODI functional limitation score was 47.2 (14.0) (moderate functional limitations), with reduced physical (mean [SD], 28.5 [8.3]) and mental (mean [SD], 42.5 [11.8]) health-related QOL on the SF-12 and high opioid dosage (mean [SD], 177 [1041] MME/d). Over time, each group significantly improved their outcomes, without serious adverse effects. The intention-to-treat linear mixed-effects model analysis did not detect significant between-group differences at 6 and 12 months for pain (0.21 [95% CI, -0.05 to 0.48; P = .12] and 0.13 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.40; P = .33], respectively) or function (0.07 [95% CI, -1.80 to 1.93; P = .94], and 0.27 [95% CI, -1.59 to 2.12; P = .78], respectively) and indicated MBT's noninferiority relative to CBT on primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large trial, CLBP-related symptoms improved, while opioid dosage decreased in both MBT and CBT groups at 6 and 12 months. Increasing availability of these safe psychological therapies could help reduce individual and societal burdens of refractory, opioid-treated CLBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03115359.

摘要

重要性

慢性下腰痛(CLBP)可能需要使用阿片类药物治疗。需要有效的方法来减轻CLBP的症状以及与阿片类药物相关的危害。认知行为疗法(CBT)和基于正念的疗法(MBT)可能有用,但尚未针对接受阿片类药物治疗的CLBP进行充分研究。

目的

比较MBT与CBT在接受阿片类药物治疗的CLBP中的有效性,假设MBT更具优势。

设计、地点和参与者:在这项为期12个月、由社区合作伙伴提供信息、部分设盲、多地点的随机临床试验中,初级和专科护理诊所及社区环境中的参与者被随机分配(1:1)到MBT或CBT组。参与者包括英语流利的成年人(21岁及以上),无MBT或CBT训练史,患有中度至重度CLBP(简短疼痛问卷[BPI]平均得分≥3;奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数[ODI]功能受限得分≥20),接受阿片类药物治疗,剂量至少为15毫克/天的吗啡毫克当量(MME),持续至少3个月。从2017年7月1日至2022年11月23日收集结果数据。分析采用意向性分析方法。

干预措施

基于手册的MBT或CBT干预,包括8次每周由治疗师主导的小组会议及家庭练习。

结果和测量指标

在6个月和12个月时比较自我报告的共同主要结局(平均疼痛严重程度,0 - 10分[BPI];功能受限,0 - 100分[ODI])以及次要结局(医学结局研究简明健康调查中与身心健康相关的生活质量[QOL]以及每天的阿片类药物剂量,时间线回顾法)。

结果

在6024名筛查个体中,2926名不符合条件,2328名符合条件,770名被纳入研究,其中MBT组385名,CBT组385名。其中,434名参与者(56.4%)为女性,647名(84.0%)为非西班牙裔,630名(81.8%)为白人;平均(标准差)年龄为57.8(11.3)岁。平均(标准差)BPI平均疼痛评分为6.1(1.6)(中度疼痛),平均(标准差)ODI功能受限评分为47.2(14.0)(中度功能受限),SF - 12中与身体(平均[标准差],28.5[8.3])和精神(平均[标准差],42.5[11.8])健康相关的生活质量降低,且阿片类药物剂量较高(平均[标准差],177[1041] MME/天)。随着时间推移,每组的结局均显著改善,且无严重不良反应。意向性分析的线性混合效应模型分析在6个月和12个月时未检测到两组在疼痛(分别为0.21[95%置信区间,-0.05至0.48;P = 0.12]和0.13[95%置信区间,-0.13至0.40;P = 0.33])或功能(分别为0.07[95%置信区间,-1.80至1.93;P = 0.94]和0.27[95%置信区间,-1.59至2.12;P = 0.78])方面存在显著组间差异,并表明在主要结局上MBT相对于CBT无劣势。

结论和相关性

在这项大型试验中,6个月和12个月时,MBT组和CBT组与CLBP相关的症状均有所改善,同时阿片类药物剂量均有所降低。增加这些安全心理治疗方法的可及性有助于减轻难治性、接受阿片类药物治疗的CLBP的个人和社会负担。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03115359

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e2d/11976494/35f5aa55c155/jamanetwopen-e253204-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验