Kirkwood Amy A, Goulden Nicholas, Moppett John, Samarasinghe Sujith, Hough Rachael, Rowntree Clare, Lawson Sarah, Kearns Pam, Lawson Anna, Vora Ajay
CR UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London.
Great Ormond Street Hospital, London.
J Clin Oncol. 2025 May 20;43(15):1810-1823. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01851. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
UKALL 2011 randomly assigned children and young adults (younger than 25 years) with ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma. The aims were to reduce induction toxicity (randomization 1 [R1]), CNS relapse risk (randomization 2 [R2]-interim maintenance [R2IM]), and maintenance morbidity (R2pulses).
R1 compared induction dexamethasone (dex) for 28 days (6 mg/m; standard) with 14 days (10 mg/m; short). R2 was a factorial randomization resulting in four arms: high-dose methotrexate (HDM) with pulses, HDM without pulses, standard interim maintenance (SIM) with pulses (standard of care), and SIM without pulses. The primary end points were reduction in steroid-related toxicity (R1), CNS relapse rate (CNSR, R2IM), and bone marrow relapse rate (BMR, R2pulses; ALL only, noninferiority margin 5%). Event-free survival (EFS) was an additional primary end point for both randomizations.
Of 2,750 eligible patients registered between April 2012 and December 2018, 1,902 were randomly assigned to R1 and 1,570 to R2. Median follow-up is 99 (R1) and 87 months (R2). There were no differences in steroid-related toxicity between short and standard dex (23.8% 25.5%; = .41) and CNSR between SIM and HDM (0.98 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.49]; = .94; 5-year rates: SIM 5.3% and HDM 5.5%). EFS was no different between R1 and R2IM arms. BMR in the no pulses arm was noninferior (+1.7% increase at 5 years [95% CI, -1.5 to 4.1]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.19 [95% CI, 0.87 to 1.62]; = .27). Although the EFS in the no pulses arm was inferior (1.34 [95% CI, 1.05 to 1.73]; = .021), this was not significant for relapse (HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.62]; = .10).
Shorter duration of induction dex does not reduce steroid-related toxicity and HDM does not improve CNSR within a UKALL treatment backbone. Omission of pulses is noninferior for BMR.
UKALL 2011研究将急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)或淋巴细胞性淋巴瘤患儿及年轻成人(年龄小于25岁)进行随机分组。目的是降低诱导期毒性(随机分组1 [R1])、中枢神经系统复发风险(随机分组2 [R2] - interim maintenance [R2IM])以及维持期发病率(R2脉冲治疗)。
R1比较了28天(6毫克/平方米;标准方案)与14天(10毫克/平方米;短疗程方案)的诱导期地塞米松治疗。R2是析因随机分组,产生四个组:高剂量甲氨蝶呤(HDM)联合脉冲治疗、HDM不联合脉冲治疗、标准间歇维持治疗(SIM)联合脉冲治疗(标准治疗方案)以及SIM不联合脉冲治疗。主要终点为类固醇相关毒性的降低(R1)、中枢神经系统复发率(CNSR,R2IM)以及骨髓复发率(BMR,R2脉冲治疗;仅针对ALL,非劣效界值为5%)。无事件生存期(EFS)是两个随机分组的另一个主要终点。
在2012年4月至2018年12月登记的2750例符合条件的患者中,1902例被随机分配至R1,1570例被随机分配至R2。中位随访时间R1为99个月,R2为87个月。短疗程与标准疗程地塞米松治疗在类固醇相关毒性方面无差异(23.8%对25.5%;P = 0.41),SIM与HDM在CNSR方面也无差异(0.98 [95%置信区间,0.65至1.49];P = 0.94;5年发生率:SIM为5.3%,HDM为5.5%)。R1和R2IM组之间的EFS无差异。无脉冲治疗组的BMR非劣效(5年增加1.7% [95%置信区间,-1.5至4.1];风险比[HR],1.19 [95%置信区间,0.87至1.62];P = 0.27)。尽管无脉冲治疗组中的EFS较差(1.34 [95%置信区间,1.05至1.73];P = 0.021),但对于复发而言这并不显著(HR,1.24 [95%置信区间,0.96至1.62];P = 0.10)。
在UKALL治疗方案框架内,缩短诱导期地塞米松疗程不会降低类固醇相关毒性,HDM也不会改善CNSR。省略脉冲治疗在BMR方面非劣效。