Bostrom Bruce C, Sensel Martha R, Sather Harland N, Gaynon Paul S, La Mei K, Johnston Katherine, Erdmann Gary R, Gold Stuart, Heerema Nyla A, Hutchinson Raymond J, Provisor Arthur J, Trigg Michael E
Pediatric Oncology, Children's Hospitals and Clinics, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Blood. 2003 May 15;101(10):3809-17. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2454. Epub 2003 Jan 16.
Conventional therapy for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) includes prednisone and oral 6-mercaptopurine. Prior observations suggested potential advantages for dexamethasone over prednisone and for intravenous (IV) over oral 6-mercaptopurine, which remain to be validated. We report the results of a randomized trial of more than 1000 subjects that examined the efficacy of dexamethasone and IV 6-mercaptopurine. Children with National Cancer Institute standard-risk ALL were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive dexamethasone (6 mg/m(2)/d) for 28 days in induction, plus taper, compared with prednisone (40 mg/m(2)/d). The second randomized assignment was for daily oral or weekly IV 6-mercaptopurine during consolidation. During maintenance, 5 days of the randomized steroid was given monthly, at the same dose, and all patients received daily oral 6-mercaptopurine. During delayed intensification, all patients received a dexamethasone dosage of 10 mg/m(2)/d for 21 days, with taper. Intrathecal (IT) methotrexate was the sole central nervous system-directed therapy. Patients randomly assigned to receive dexamethasone had a 6-year isolated central nervous system-relapse rate of 3.7% +/- 0.8%, compared with 7.1% +/- 1.1% for prednisone (P =.01). There was also a trend toward fewer isolated bone marrow relapses with dexamethasone. The 6-year event-free survival (EFS) was 85% +/- 2% for dexamethasone and 77% +/- 2% for prednisone (P =.002). EFS was similar with oral or IV 6-mercaptopurine; however, patients assigned to IV 6-mercaptopurine had decreased survival after relapse.
儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的传统治疗方法包括泼尼松和口服6-巯基嘌呤。先前的观察表明,地塞米松可能比泼尼松更具优势,静脉注射(IV)6-巯基嘌呤比口服更具优势,但这些仍有待验证。我们报告了一项针对1000多名受试者的随机试验结果,该试验考察了地塞米松和静脉注射6-巯基嘌呤的疗效。患有美国国立癌症研究所标准风险ALL的儿童按2×2析因设计随机分组,在诱导期接受地塞米松(6毫克/平方米/天)治疗28天,加逐渐减量,与泼尼松(40毫克/平方米/天)相比。第二次随机分组是在巩固期接受每日口服或每周静脉注射6-巯基嘌呤。在维持期,每月给予5天随机分配的类固醇,剂量相同,所有患者接受每日口服6-巯基嘌呤。在延迟强化期,所有患者接受地塞米松剂量为10毫克/平方米/天,持续21天,逐渐减量。鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤是唯一针对中枢神经系统的治疗方法。随机分配接受地塞米松治疗的患者6年孤立中枢神经系统复发率为3.7%±0.8%,而泼尼松组为7.1%±1.1%(P = 0.01)。地塞米松组孤立骨髓复发也有减少的趋势。地塞米松组6年无事件生存率(EFS)为85%±2%,泼尼松组为77%±2%(P = 0.002)。口服或静脉注射6-巯基嘌呤的EFS相似;然而,分配接受静脉注射6-巯基嘌呤的患者复发后的生存率降低。