Compagnone Miriam, Dall'Ara Gianni, Grotti Simone, Spartà Daniela, Guerrieri Giuseppe, Pizzi Carmine, Tarantino Fabio Felice, Galvani Marcello
Interventional and Structural Cardiovascular Unit, Forlì-Cesena, AUSL Romagna, Italy.
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences-DIMEC-Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):136-143. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31519. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
Transcatheter structural heart procedures have become standard therapy for elderly patients with high surgical risk. Over time, these procedures have significantly increased worldwide, accompanied by a concomitant reduction of major complications, including those requiring emergent cardiac surgery (ECS). This marked decline in ECS is due to technological advancements, improved patient selection and procedural techniques, and increased institutional and operators expertize. Moreover, most major structural complications after transcatheter structural heart procedures are now managed percutaneously, with only a small proportion requiring ECS. It is important to note that outcomes for patients requiring ECS remain unfavorable, even in the optimal setting. Currently, ECS after percutaneous structural interventions is very rare, less than 0.5%, as reported in multicenter available studies. However, fragmented data exist in the literature on the need of ECS. Indeed, low incidence, different definitions, and lack of recent reports make it difficult to have a precise and up-to-date overview of bailout surgery for treatment of procedural complications. This is the first comprehensive analysis focusing on ECS following the major frequent percutaneous structural procedures, that is, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, mitral valve repair/replacement, and left atrial appendage occlusion. More in general, a collaborative approach among Heart Team members, along with thorough procedural planning guided by advanced imaging techniques, is essential for ensuring high-quality interventions thus minimizing the risk of adverse events.
经导管结构性心脏病手术已成为高手术风险老年患者的标准治疗方法。随着时间的推移,这些手术在全球范围内显著增加,同时主要并发症有所减少,包括那些需要急诊心脏手术(ECS)的并发症。急诊心脏手术的显著下降归因于技术进步、患者选择和手术技术的改进,以及机构和术者专业水平的提高。此外,经导管结构性心脏病手术后的大多数主要结构性并发症现在通过经皮方式处理,只有一小部分需要急诊心脏手术。需要注意的是,即使在最佳情况下,需要急诊心脏手术的患者的预后仍然不佳。目前,经皮结构性干预后的急诊心脏手术非常罕见,如多中心现有研究所报道的,低于0.5%。然而,文献中关于急诊心脏手术需求的数据零散。事实上,发病率低、定义不同以及缺乏近期报告使得难以对用于治疗手术并发症的补救手术有精确和最新的概述。这是首次针对主要常见经皮结构性手术(即经导管主动脉瓣置换术、二尖瓣修复/置换术和左心耳封堵术)后急诊心脏手术的综合分析。更一般地说,心脏团队成员之间的协作方法,以及在先进成像技术指导下进行全面的手术规划,对于确保高质量干预从而将不良事件风险降至最低至关重要。