Tan Joakim, Rylski Alexia, Bergqvist Anders, Stephanson Niclas Nikolai
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Laboratory of Drugs of Abuse Analysis, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Mass Spectrom. 2025 May;60(5):e5132. doi: 10.1002/jms.5132.
Oral fluid sampling offers advantages over other biological matrices, mainly due to its noninvasive procedure avoiding privacy intrusion. The fully automated sample preparation procedure is based on salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) combined with high-efficiency LC-MS/MS methods for both screening and confirmation of 37 drugs and incorporates novel features enabling direct injection of acetonitrile extracts into an innovative chromatographic system. The methods' drug panel includes opioids, benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-like drugs, cannabinoids, and stimulants. A full method validation was performed using OF/buffer from Greiner Bio-ONE International and Quantisal saliva collection devices. The validation included assessments of linearity, sensitivity, precision, accuracy, extraction recovery, matrix effects, process efficiency, stability, and carryover. All compounds demonstrated linearity across the concentration range 1-25 ng/mL, with R ≥ 0.99. Both methods' limit of detection ranged between 0.001 and 0.03 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 ng/mL. Precision was ≤ 14.8% for screening and ≤ 8.5% for the confirmation method. Accuracy was ± 13.6% for screening and ± 8.7% (except at 0.5 and 1 ng/mL, where it was ± 25.3% and ± 17.6%, respectively) for the confirmation method. Extraction recoveries ranged from 40.0% to 95.1%, except for hydromorphone (27.4%) and morphine (34.4%). Although matrix effects were observed for a large number of compounds to varying degrees, they were largely compensated for by the use of deuterium- and C-labeled internal standards (IS). IS-corrected overall process efficiency ranged from 100.7% to 119.1% with precision (CV%) ≤ 10.8% for all compounds. Spiked calibrators and QC samples in OF were stable in autosampler for up to 72 h and in the freezer for 3 days. Methanol working solutions were stable for 6 months. No significant carryover was observed. The methods have been successfully implemented in the routine analysis of approximately > 1000 samples per month since March 2024.
口腔液采样相较于其他生物样本基质具有优势,主要是因为其采样过程无创,避免了侵犯隐私。全自动样本制备程序基于盐析辅助液液萃取(SALLE),并结合高效液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法,用于筛查和确证37种药物,还具备一些新特性,能够将乙腈提取物直接注入创新的色谱系统。该方法的药物检测组包括阿片类药物、苯二氮䓬类药物、苯二氮䓬样药物、大麻素和兴奋剂。使用来自Greiner Bio-ONE International的口腔液/缓冲液和Quantisal唾液采集装置进行了全面的方法验证。验证包括线性、灵敏度、精密度、准确度、提取回收率、基质效应、过程效率、稳定性和残留评估。所有化合物在1 - 25 ng/mL的浓度范围内均表现出线性,R≥0.99。两种方法的检测限在0.001至0.03 ng/mL之间,定量限在0.02至0.09 ng/mL之间。筛查的精密度≤14.8%,确证方法的精密度≤8.5%。筛查的准确度为±13.6%,确证方法的准确度为±8.7%(0.5和1 ng/mL处除外,分别为±25.3%和±17.6%)。提取回收率在40.0%至95.1%之间,氢吗啡酮(27.4%)和吗啡(34.4%)除外。尽管观察到大量化合物存在不同程度的基质效应,但通过使用氘代和碳标记的内标(IS)在很大程度上得到了补偿。经内标校正后的总体过程效率在100.7%至119.1%之间,所有化合物的精密度(CV%)≤10.8%。添加了标准品的口腔液校准品和质量控制(QC)样品在自动进样器中最多可稳定72小时,在冰箱中可稳定3天。甲醇工作溶液稳定6个月。未观察到明显的残留。自2024年3月以来,这些方法已成功应用于每月约1000多个样本的常规分析中。