Mazı Bekir Gökçen, Çağlayan Kübra
Department of Food Engineering, Agricultural Faculty Ordu University Turkey.
Food Sci Nutr. 2025 Apr 6;13(4):e70152. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.70152. eCollection 2025 Apr.
This study investigates the effects of soaking method (ultrasound-assisted soaking (UAS) and conventional soaking (CS)), soaking solutions with varying pH (distilled water (W), citric acid (CA), and sodium bicarbonate (SB)), and soaking times (4, 8, and 12 h) on anti-nutritional factors (phytic acid (PA) and trypsin inhibitor (TI) contents), moisture absorption, and hardness of chickpeas, beans, and soybeans. Additionally, the study examined changes in soluble solids content (SSC), pH, turbidity, and color of the soaking solutions. While the soaking method and solution significantly ( < 0.05) affected TI content in seeds, they had no notable impact on PA content. The most notable reductions in PA were observed following 12 h of CS: 27.0% in chickpeas and 38.9% in soybeans soaked in water, and 30.5% in beans soaked in sodium bicarbonate. Sodium bicarbonate was more effective than citric acid and water in reducing TI. UAS generally led to greater TI reductions compared to CS, although its effectiveness was reduced in sodium bicarbonate. UAS resulted in higher hydration rates across all solutions. Chickpeas and beans soaked in citric acid for 4 h and soybeans soaked in citric acid for 12 h exhibited the lowest hardness values. UAS notably increased SSC, turbidity, and pH changes in the soaking solutions compared to CS.
本研究调查了浸泡方法(超声辅助浸泡(UAS)和传统浸泡(CS))、不同pH值的浸泡溶液(蒸馏水(W)、柠檬酸(CA)和碳酸氢钠(SB))以及浸泡时间(4、8和12小时)对鹰嘴豆、菜豆和大豆的抗营养因子(植酸(PA)和胰蛋白酶抑制剂(TI)含量)、吸湿性和硬度的影响。此外,该研究还检测了浸泡溶液的可溶性固形物含量(SSC)、pH值、浊度和颜色的变化。虽然浸泡方法和溶液对种子中的TI含量有显著影响(<0.05),但它们对PA含量没有显著影响。在传统浸泡12小时后,PA含量出现了最显著的降低:浸泡在水中的鹰嘴豆降低了27.0%,大豆降低了38.9%,浸泡在碳酸氢钠中的菜豆降低了30.5%。碳酸氢钠在降低TI方面比柠檬酸和水更有效。与传统浸泡相比,超声辅助浸泡通常能使TI含量有更大幅度的降低,不过在碳酸氢钠溶液中其效果有所降低。超声辅助浸泡在所有溶液中都导致了更高的水合速率。浸泡在柠檬酸中4小时的鹰嘴豆和菜豆以及浸泡在柠檬酸中12小时的大豆表现出最低的硬度值。与传统浸泡相比,超声辅助浸泡显著增加了浸泡溶液中的可溶性固形物含量、浊度和pH值变化。