• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于改善柔性机器人内窥镜检查人体工程学的新型用户控制设备的设计与评估

Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.

作者信息

Heisterberg Leander, Manfredi Luigi, Wichmann Dörte, Maier Thomas, Pott Peter P

机构信息

Institute of Medical Device Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

Division of Imaging Science and Technology, Centre of Medical Engineering and Technology (CMET), School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2025 Mar 24;12:1559574. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574
PMID:40196841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11973676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ergonomics of flexible endoscopes require improvement as the current design carries a high risk of musculoskeletal injury for endoscopists. Robotic systems offer a solution by separating the endoscope from the control handle, allowing a focus on ergonomics and usability. Despite the increasing interest in this field, little attention has been paid towards developing ergonomic human input devices. This study addresses two key questions: How can handheld control devices for flexible robotic endoscopy be designed to prioritize ergonomics and usability? And, how effective are these new devices in a simulated clinical environment?

METHODS

Addressing this gap, the study proposes two handheld input device models for controlling a flexible endoscope in four degrees of freedom (DOFs) and an endoscopic instrument in three DOFs. A two-stage evaluation was conducted with six endoscopists evaluating the physical ergonomics and a final clinical user evaluation with seven endoscopists using a virtual colonoscopy simulator with proportional velocity and position mapping.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Both models demonstrated clinical suitability, with the first model scoring 4.8 and the second model scoring 5.2 out of 6 in the final evaluation. In sum, the study presents two designs of ergonomic control devices for robotic colonoscopy, which have the potential to reduce endoscopy-related injuries. Furthermore, the proposed colonoscopy simulator is useful to evaluate the benefits of different mapping modes. This could help to optimize the design and control mechanism of future control devices.

摘要

背景

由于当前的设计使内镜医师面临较高的肌肉骨骼损伤风险,因此柔性内窥镜的人体工程学需要改进。机器人系统通过将内窥镜与控制手柄分离提供了一种解决方案,从而可以专注于人体工程学和可用性。尽管该领域的关注度不断提高,但对开发符合人体工程学的人体输入设备却很少有人关注。本研究解决了两个关键问题:如何设计用于柔性机器人内窥镜检查的手持式控制设备,以优先考虑人体工程学和可用性?以及,这些新设备在模拟临床环境中的效果如何?

方法

为了填补这一空白,该研究提出了两种手持式输入设备模型,用于控制具有四个自由度(DOF)的柔性内窥镜和具有三个自由度的内窥镜器械。进行了两阶段评估,六名内镜医师评估了物理人体工程学,最后七名内镜医师使用具有比例速度和位置映射的虚拟结肠镜模拟器进行了临床用户评估。

结果与讨论

两种模型均显示出临床适用性,在最终评估中,第一种模型得分为4.8,第二种模型得分为5.2(满分6分)。总之,该研究提出了两种用于机器人结肠镜检查的符合人体工程学的控制设备设计,它们有可能减少与内窥镜检查相关的损伤。此外,所提出的结肠镜模拟器有助于评估不同映射模式的益处。这有助于优化未来控制设备的设计和控制机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/51776ad018f6/frobt-12-1559574-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/7c774883ab67/frobt-12-1559574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/384621fc173a/frobt-12-1559574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/df0e32e53f94/frobt-12-1559574-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/5e1db77ef970/frobt-12-1559574-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/db085f59fe46/frobt-12-1559574-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/51776ad018f6/frobt-12-1559574-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/7c774883ab67/frobt-12-1559574-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/384621fc173a/frobt-12-1559574-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/df0e32e53f94/frobt-12-1559574-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/5e1db77ef970/frobt-12-1559574-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/db085f59fe46/frobt-12-1559574-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff75/11973676/51776ad018f6/frobt-12-1559574-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Design and evaluation of new user control devices for improved ergonomics in flexible robotic endoscopy.用于改善柔性机器人内窥镜检查人体工程学的新型用户控制设备的设计与评估
Front Robot AI. 2025 Mar 24;12:1559574. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1559574. eCollection 2025.
2
Robotic Handle Prototypes for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery: Pre-clinical Randomised Controlled Trial of Performance and Ergonomics.用于内镜经鼻颅底外科的机器人手柄原型:性能和人体工程学的临床前随机对照试验。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2022 May;50(5):549-563. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-02942-z. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
Intuitive user interfaces increase efficiency in endoscope tip control.直观的用户界面提高了内镜尖端控制的效率。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2600-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3510-1. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
4
A highly intuitive and ergonomic redundant joint master device for four-degrees of freedom flexible endoscopic surgery robot.一种高度直观和符合人体工程学的冗余关节主手装置,用于四自由度柔性内窥镜手术机器人。
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1-14. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2147. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
5
An estimation of the endoscopist's musculoskeletal injury risk for right and left lateral decubitus positions during colonoscopy: a field-based ergonomic study.结肠镜检查中右侧和左侧侧卧位时内镜医师肌肉骨骼损伤风险的估计:基于现场的工效学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Jun 10;24(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06606-4.
6
Assessment of Postural Ergonomics and Surgical Performance in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a Handheld Robotic Device.使用手持机器人设备评估腹腔镜单孔手术中的姿势人体工程学和手术操作表现。
Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):208-217. doi: 10.1177/1553350618759768. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
7
A robotic system for solo surgery in flexible ureteroscopy: development and evaluation with clinical users.一种用于软性输尿管镜手术的机器人系统:与临床用户一起进行的开发和评估。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023 Sep;18(9):1559-1569. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-02883-5. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
8
An intuitive surgical handle design for robotic neurosurgery.直观的手术手柄设计用于机器人神经外科手术。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2021 Jul;16(7):1131-1139. doi: 10.1007/s11548-021-02402-4. Epub 2021 May 24.
9
Ergonomic endoscopy: An oxymoron or realistic goal?**译文**: 符合人体工程学的内镜检查:似是而非,还是切实目标?
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Dec;90(6):966-970. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.023. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
10
Alternative PACS interface devices are well-accepted and may reduce radiologist's musculoskeletal discomfort as compared to keyboard-mouse-recording device.替代 PACS 接口设备被广泛接受,与键盘-鼠标-记录设备相比,可能会减少放射科医生的肌肉骨骼不适。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):5200-5208. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06851-4. Epub 2020 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopy: A Comprehensive Review of System Functions and Analysis of Outcome Data.机器人辅助支气管镜检查:系统功能全面综述及结果数据分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 12;14(4):399. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040399.
2
"Tool-in-lesion" Accuracy of Galaxy System-A Robotic Electromagnetic Navigation BroncHoscopy With Integrated Tool-in-lesion-Tomosynthesis Technology: The MATCH Study.“器械在病灶中”的 Galaxy 系统-一种带有病灶中集成工具断层合成技术的机器人电磁导航支气管镜的准确性:MATCH 研究。
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2024 Jan 1;31(1):23-29. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000923.
3
Methods for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quantification: A Focus on Hands and Fingers Kinematics.
胃肠道内镜量化方法:手部和手指运动学的焦点。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 28;22(23):9253. doi: 10.3390/s22239253.
4
Artificial intelligence and automation in endoscopy and surgery.内镜检查与手术中的人工智能和自动化
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Mar;20(3):171-182. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00701-y. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Patient Factors Affect Ergonomic Strain of Endoscopists During Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查期间影响内镜医师人体工程学劳损的患者因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Mar;68(3):736-743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07721-3. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
Procedural and anthropometric factors associated with musculoskeletal injuries among gastroenterology endoscopists.与胃肠病内镜医师肌肉骨骼损伤相关的操作和人体测量因素。
Appl Ergon. 2022 Oct;104:103805. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103805. Epub 2022 May 29.
7
Gastrointestinal endoscopy and work-related injuries: an international survey.胃肠内镜检查与工作相关损伤:一项国际调查。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E562-E569. doi: 10.1055/a-1789-0506. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Ergonomics of gastrointestinal endoscopies: Musculoskeletal injury among endoscopy physicians, nurses, and technicians.胃肠内镜检查的人体工程学:内镜医师、护士和技术人员的肌肉骨骼损伤
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Mar 16;14(3):142-152. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i3.142.
9
Application of robotic technologies in lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopy: A systematic review.机器人技术在低位胃肠道内镜检查中的应用:一项系统评价。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):673-697. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i12.673.
10
A decade retrospective of medical robotics research from 2010 to 2020.2010 年至 2020 年医学机器人研究的十年回顾。
Sci Robot. 2021 Nov 10;6(60):eabi8017. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abi8017.