• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫新定义对诊断、治疗及短期预后的影响——一项前瞻性研究。

The impact of the new definition of epilepsy on diagnosis, treatment, and short-term outcomes-A prospective study.

作者信息

Habermehl Lena, Linka Louise, Krause Kristin, Fuchs Alena, Weil Jenny, Gurschi Mariana, Zahnert Felix, Möller Leona, Menzler Katja, Knake Susanne

机构信息

Epilepsy Center Hessen, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Epilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 24;16:1564680. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1564680. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1564680
PMID:40196867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11973069/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2014, the ILAE introduced a new definition of epilepsy that allows some patients to be diagnosed earlier than under the previously used definition. According to the old classification, the diagnosis was made after a second unprovoked seizure. The risk of this was 36% after the first seizure. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical impact of the new definition on diagnosis, treatment, and short-term outcome.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2021, adult patients admitted with a first epileptic seizure were prospectively included. Demographic and clinical data were collected at baseline, at 6 and 12 months follow-up (FU). Factors affecting seizure recurrence, especially age, use of anti-seizure medication (ASM), interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) in the EEG, and the presence of structural lesions on imaging were investigated.

RESULTS

Data from 235 patients were collected (41.7% female). Of these, 146 patients (62.1%) were diagnosed with epilepsy (PWE), following the new ILAE-criteria. Potential epileptogenic lesions on imaging were found in 49.3% of PWE. At the first FU (6.08 months ± 1.35), 143 patients (77.3%) were seizure-free, including 89 of the 146 patients diagnosed as PWE were seizure-free (70.6%). At the second FU (12.45 months ± 1.83), 129 patients (80.6%) were seizure-free. Seventy-seven of the PWE were seizure-free (72%). The use of ASM decreased (odds ratio = 0.46, = 0.004) the recurrence rate significantly.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the new definition of epilepsy results in a higher frequency of epilepsy diagnosis and treatment. Short-term outcomes improved (1-year-recurrence rate of 19.4%).

摘要

背景

2014年,国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)引入了癫痫的新定义,该定义使一些患者能够比使用先前定义时更早被诊断。根据旧分类,在第二次无诱因发作后才做出诊断。首次发作后发生第二次无诱因发作的风险为36%。本研究的目的是调查新定义对诊断、治疗和短期结局的临床影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入2018年至2021年因首次癫痫发作入院的成年患者。在基线、6个月和12个月随访(FU)时收集人口统计学和临床数据。研究影响癫痫复发的因素,特别是年龄、抗癫痫药物(ASM)的使用、脑电图中的发作间期癫痫样放电(IED)以及影像学上结构性病变的存在情况。

结果

收集了235例患者的数据(女性占41.7%)。其中,146例患者(62.1%)根据新的ILAE标准被诊断为癫痫(PWE)。49.3%的PWE在影像学上发现有潜在的致痫性病变。在首次随访(6.08个月±1.35)时,143例患者(77.3%)无癫痫发作,其中146例被诊断为PWE的患者中有89例无癫痫发作(70.6%)。在第二次随访(12.45个月±1.83)时,129例患者(80.6%)无癫痫发作。77例PWE无癫痫发作(72%)。ASM的使用显著降低了复发率(优势比=0.46,P=0.004)。

结论

我们的结果表明,癫痫的新定义导致癫痫诊断和治疗的频率更高。短期结局得到改善(1年复发率为19.4%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a5/11973069/6333c86a24f1/fneur-16-1564680-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a5/11973069/6333c86a24f1/fneur-16-1564680-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07a5/11973069/6333c86a24f1/fneur-16-1564680-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of the new definition of epilepsy on diagnosis, treatment, and short-term outcomes-A prospective study.癫痫新定义对诊断、治疗及短期预后的影响——一项前瞻性研究。
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 24;16:1564680. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1564680. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of the revised definition of epilepsy on treatment decisions and seizure recurrence after a first epileptic seizure.修订版癫痫定义对首次癫痫发作后治疗决策和发作复发的影响。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1557-1564. doi: 10.1111/ene.15769. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
3
Prospective study of epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone: Clinical features, response to treatment, and likelihood of medication withdrawal.单纯全面性强直-阵挛发作癫痫的前瞻性研究:临床特征、治疗反应和停药可能性。
Epilepsia Open. 2024 Aug;9(4):1426-1436. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12981. Epub 2024 May 31.
4
Long-term applicability of the new ILAE definition of epilepsy. Results from the PRO-LONG study.新 ILAE 癫痫定义的长期适用性。来自 PRO-LONG 研究的结果。
Epilepsia. 2017 Sep;58(9):1518-1523. doi: 10.1111/epi.13854. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Prognostic implications of persistent interictal epileptiform discharges on antiseizure medication withdrawal in patients with epilepsy in five-year remission.在五年缓解期的癫痫患者中,持续性发作间期癫痫样放电对抗癫痫药物停药的预后意义。
Seizure. 2022 Jan;94:100-106. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
6
Response to subsequent antiseizure medications after first antiseizure medication failure in newly diagnosed epilepsy.新诊断癫痫患者首次抗癫痫药物治疗失败后对后续抗癫痫药物的反应。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1042168. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1042168. eCollection 2022.
7
Video-EEG-monitoring to guide antiseizure medication withdrawal.视频脑电图监测以指导抗癫痫药物撤药
Neurol Res Pract. 2023 May 18;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42466-023-00248-6.
8
Operational diagnosis of epilepsy in children at undetermined risk: A meta-analysis of prognostic factors for seizure recurrence.儿童不确定风险癫痫的操作性诊断:复发预测因素的荟萃分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Feb;127:108498. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108498. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
10
Is the first seizure epilepsy--and when?首次无诱因发作是否即为癫痫发作——以及何时是?
Epilepsia. 2015 Sep;56(9):1425-31. doi: 10.1111/epi.13093. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognosis and management of acute symptomatic seizures: a prospective, multicenter, observational study.急性症状性癫痫发作的预后与管理:一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Sep 15;13(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01183-0.
2
Driving regulations for epilepsy in Europe.欧洲的癫痫驾驶法规。
Seizure. 2023 Jul;109:83-91. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Incidence, Implications, and Management of Seizures Following Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke.缺血性卒中和出血性卒中后癫痫发作的发生率、影响和处理。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2019 May 27;19(7):37. doi: 10.1007/s11910-019-0957-4.
4
Neuroimaging of first-ever seizure: Contribution of MRI if CT is normal.首次发作的神经影像学检查:若CT正常,MRI的作用
Neurol Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;3(5):398-403. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e3182a78f25.
5
Long-term applicability of the new ILAE definition of epilepsy. Results from the PRO-LONG study.新 ILAE 癫痫定义的长期适用性。来自 PRO-LONG 研究的结果。
Epilepsia. 2017 Sep;58(9):1518-1523. doi: 10.1111/epi.13854. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Epidemiology of early stages of epilepsy: Risk of seizure recurrence after a first seizure.癫痫早期的流行病学:首次发作后癫痫复发的风险
Seizure. 2017 Jul;49:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
New-Onset Seizure in Adults and Adolescents: A Review.成人和青少年新发癫痫:综述。
JAMA. 2016 Dec 27;316(24):2657-2668. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18625.
8
Immediate antiepileptic drug treatment, versus placebo, deferred, or no treatment for first unprovoked seizure.对于首次无诱因发作,立即给予抗癫痫药物治疗与给予安慰剂、延迟治疗或不治疗的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 6;2016(5):CD007144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007144.pub2.
9
Is the first seizure epilepsy--and when?首次无诱因发作是否即为癫痫发作——以及何时是?
Epilepsia. 2015 Sep;56(9):1425-31. doi: 10.1111/epi.13093. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
The diagnostic accuracy of routine electroencephalography after a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后常规脑电图的诊断准确性
Eur J Neurol. 2016 Mar;23(3):455-63. doi: 10.1111/ene.12739. Epub 2015 Jun 13.