Suppr超能文献

比较STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™和IMMUNOWELL™ JCV检测在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中评估进行性多灶性白质脑病风险的效果。

Comparing STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV Tests in RRMS to Assess PML Risk.

作者信息

Zanghì Aurora, Marinelli Fabiana, Filippo Paola Sofia Di, Avolio Carlo, D'Amico Emanuele

机构信息

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.

Neurology Unit, MS Center, F. Spaziani Hospital, ASL Frosinone, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025;23(10):1294-1300. doi: 10.2174/011570159X372688250226110925.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of developing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare but potentially fatal opportunistic infection of the central nervous system caused by the J.C. virus (JCV), remains a primary concern associated with natalizumab therapy in the clinical management of patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study compared two tests, STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, and IMMUNOWELL ™ JCV antibody tests, for assessing the risk of PML in patients diagnosed with relapsing- remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) who had received disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with branded natalizumab (Tysabri®). The main objective was to determine the comparability of these tests in classifying PML risk. Eligible patients were selected from a database, and all specimens for the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™ and IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody tests were collected on the same day. Patients were classified into three risk categories (low, intermediate, or high) based on threshold values for each test.

RESULTS

The analysis showed 85.5% agreement between the two tests for risk classification. Ten discordant cases were identified, mainly between intermediate- and high-risk categories. Compared to STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, IMMUNOWELL™ JCV antibody test tended to categorize more patients as higher risk. No significant association was found between discordance and prior use of immunosuppressant drugs and >24 doses of natalizumab. The agreement between tests, assessed with the weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficient, was substantial (κ=0.6222).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™, the IMMUNOWELL™ JCV test tends to place more patients in higher risk categories. Further, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the clinical impact of these differences in PML risk assessment.

摘要

背景

进行性多灶性白质脑病(PML)是一种由JC病毒(JCV)引起的罕见但可能致命的中枢神经系统机会性感染,在多发性硬化症(MS)患者的临床管理中,发生PML的风险仍然是与那他珠单抗治疗相关的主要关注点。

材料与方法

本研究比较了两种检测方法,即STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™和IMMUNOWELL™ JCV抗体检测,用于评估接受品牌那他珠单抗(Tysabri®)疾病修饰治疗(DMT)的复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者发生PML的风险。主要目的是确定这些检测方法在分类PML风险方面的可比性。从数据库中选择符合条件的患者,STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™和IMMUNOWELL™ JCV抗体检测的所有样本均在同一天采集。根据每种检测方法的阈值,将患者分为三个风险类别(低、中或高)。

结果

分析显示,两种检测方法在风险分类方面的一致性为85.5%。确定了10例不一致的病例,主要存在于中风险和高风险类别之间。与STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™相比,IMMUNOWELL™ JCV抗体检测倾向于将更多患者分类为高风险。未发现不一致情况与先前使用免疫抑制药物以及超过24剂那他珠单抗之间存在显著关联。用加权Cohen's Kappa系数评估的检测方法之间的一致性较高(κ=0.6222)。

结论

与STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™相比,IMMUNOWELL™ JCV检测倾向于将更多患者归为高风险类别。此外,需要进行纵向研究来评估这些PML风险评估差异的临床影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/062c/12307996/1f296d5cf23a/CN-23-10-1294_F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验