• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帮助疼痛儿童的解决方案:在全国知识传播网络中融入并践行患者伙伴关系。

Solutions for Kids in Pain: Embedding and actioning patient partnership in a national knowledge mobilization network.

作者信息

Richards Dawn P, Chambers Christine T, Jordan Isabel, Strain Kimberly, Fadaak Raad, Tunnah Louise, Gruenwoldt Emily, Birnie Kathryn A

机构信息

Patient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Five02 Labs Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 7;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00663-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00663-2
PMID:40197554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11977981/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient engagement is now often expected or required by funders for research projects, initiatives, or networks. Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP) is a national knowledge mobilization network in Canada that is on a mission to mobilize evidence-based solutions in children's pain through coordination and collaboration. SKIP began as a Networks of Centres of Excellence-Knowledge Mobilization (NCE-KM) network from 2019 to 2024 and continues as a university-based centre. SKIP was built on a foundation of engaging with patients (children and youth) and caregivers (parents) primarily guided by the Patients Included™ charter.

MAIN BODY

This paper shares SKIP's leading approach to patient partnership during its time as a NCE-KM network. As required by its NCE funding, SKIP was hosted by an academic institution (Dalhousie University) and co-led by a knowledge user partner (Children's Healthcare Canada), with six hubs across Canada. Here, we demonstrate how SKIP integrated patient partners through its governance, management, committees, and KM activities. We also discuss patient partnership resources developed by SKIP to support its implementation of quality patient partnership practices. Three case examples show in detail how SKIP tailored and evolved its patient partnership approach to specific projects and context. These examples include SKIP's Patient and Caregiver Advisory Committee, a national Youth in Pain project, and integrating patient partners in the co-development of Canada's first national health standard for Pediatric Pain Management. Each case demonstrates foundational principles to SKIP's patient partnership including providing compensation and efforts to create safe and inclusive spaces.

CONCLUSION

SKIP's commitment to patient partnership is actioned through integrating patient partners throughout all aspects of its work. We share insights gained from SKIP's patient partnership activities during its time as an NCE-KM network, including developed resources and practices. We encourage others to adopt and adapt our learnings and resources for their own work. As SKIP's NCE-KM funding and structure ends and the organization continues as a university-based centre, SKIP remains committed to developing and sharing leading patient partnership practices.

摘要

背景

资助者现在通常期望或要求研究项目、倡议或网络让患者参与进来。加拿大的“疼痛儿童解决方案”(SKIP)是一个全国性的知识传播网络,其使命是通过协调与合作来推动基于证据的儿童疼痛解决方案。SKIP在2019年至2024年期间是卓越中心知识传播网络(NCE-KM),之后继续作为一个大学附属中心。SKIP建立在与患者(儿童和青少年)及护理人员(父母)合作的基础上,主要遵循“患者参与”宪章的指导。

主体

本文分享了SKIP在作为NCE-KM网络期间患者伙伴关系的领先方法。根据其NCE资金要求,SKIP由一所学术机构(达尔豪斯大学)主办,并由一位知识使用者伙伴(加拿大儿童医疗保健组织)共同领导,在加拿大各地设有六个中心。在这里,我们展示了SKIP如何通过其治理、管理、委员会和知识传播活动来整合患者伙伴。我们还讨论了SKIP开发的患者伙伴关系资源,以支持其实施高质量的患者伙伴关系实践。三个案例详细展示了SKIP如何根据特定项目和背景调整并发展其患者伙伴关系方法。这些例子包括SKIP的患者和护理人员咨询委员会、一个全国性的疼痛青少年项目,以及将患者伙伴纳入加拿大首个全国性儿科疼痛管理健康标准的共同制定过程。每个案例都展示了SKIP患者伙伴关系的基本原则,包括提供补偿以及努力营造安全和包容的空间。

结论

SKIP对患者伙伴关系的承诺通过在其工作的各个方面整合患者伙伴来实现。我们分享了SKIP在作为NCE-KM网络期间从患者伙伴关系活动中获得的见解,包括开发的资源和实践。我们鼓励其他人采用并调整我们的经验教训和资源以用于他们自己的工作。随着SKIP的NCE-KM资金和结构结束,该组织继续作为一个大学附属中心,SKIP仍然致力于开发和分享领先的患者伙伴关系实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/a210b375c591/40900_2024_663_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/9e75af54126d/40900_2024_663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/86f65b55142b/40900_2024_663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/a210b375c591/40900_2024_663_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/9e75af54126d/40900_2024_663_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/86f65b55142b/40900_2024_663_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e365/11977981/a210b375c591/40900_2024_663_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Solutions for Kids in Pain: Embedding and actioning patient partnership in a national knowledge mobilization network.帮助疼痛儿童的解决方案:在全国知识传播网络中融入并践行患者伙伴关系。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Apr 7;11(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00663-2.
2
Developing research collaborations and building capacity in palliative and end-of-life care in the North West Coast of England: the PalCaRe-NWC partnership.在英格兰西北海岸开展姑息治疗和临终关怀方面的研究合作并建设相关能力:PalCaRe-NWC伙伴关系。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar 19:1-13. doi: 10.3310/AWLT2995.
3
Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.评估患者参与对国家卫生研究网络的影响:慢性疼痛网络案例研究结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00491-w.
4
Supporting partnerships in knowledge mobilization: what existing implementation strategies can tell us.支持知识转化中的伙伴关系:现有实施策略能告诉我们什么。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Mar 12;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00688-1.
5
Lessons learned in measuring patient engagement in a Canada-wide childhood disability network.在加拿大全国性儿童残疾网络中衡量患者参与度所汲取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 7;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00551-9.
6
Research to Action: an evaluation.从研究到行动:一项评估
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2012 Mar;25 Spec No 2012:21-32. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2012.22814.
7
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.
8
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.通过经验探索与年轻伙伴建立研究合作关系的“方式”:从加拿大、荷兰和英国的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00400-7.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Defining the Scope of Knowledge Translation Within a National, Patient-Oriented Kidney Research Network.在一个以患者为导向的国家肾脏研究网络中界定知识转化的范围。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Apr 8;8:20543581211004803. doi: 10.1177/20543581211004803. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-designing clinical trials alongside youth with chronic pain.与患有慢性疼痛的青少年共同设计临床试验。
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 May 8;5(4):142-154. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12105. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.评估患者参与对国家卫生研究网络的影响:慢性疼痛网络案例研究结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00491-w.
3
Bridging the gap: Identifying diverse stakeholder needs and barriers to accessing evidence and resources for children's pain.
弥合差距:识别儿童疼痛领域不同利益相关者的需求以及获取证据和资源的障碍。
Can J Pain. 2022 May 17;6(1):48-64. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2022.2045192. eCollection 2022.
4
Shortening and validation of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) for measuring meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement.缩短和验证患者参与研究量表(PEIRS),以衡量有意义的患者和家庭照顾者参与度。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):863-879. doi: 10.1111/hex.13227. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.患者参与研究:患者中心的结局研究所的初步发现。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.
6
Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.患者参与研究:一项系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 26;14:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89.