Schoenfeld M H, McGovern B, Garan H, Kelly E, Grant G, Ruskin J N
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Aug;6(2):298-306. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80164-9.
To determine those factors predictive of the ability to both initiate and suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic study, the results of programmed cardiac stimulation were evaluated in 261 patients: 66 presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 91 with sustained ventricular tachycardia and 104 with ventricular fibrillation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presenting arrhythmia was a potent and independent predictor of the ability to provoke ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiologic study; a history of myocardial infarction and male sex were also significant independent predictors. Of patients presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 89% (81 of 91) had inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared with 61 (40 of 66) and 66% (69 of 104) of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Complete suppression of inducible arrhythmias could be achieved in only 52% (34 of 66) of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, compared with 73 (24 of 33) and 75% (46 of 61) of patients presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the major independent determinants of the ability to suppress inducible arrhythmias were the number of drug trials performed before electrophysiologic study (inversely correlated) and the nature of the induced arrhythmia. The nature of the presenting clinical arrhythmia is, therefore, a highly significant and independent predictor of the ability to induce ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing and an important determinant of the ability to suppress induced arrhythmias in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
为了确定在电生理研究期间能够启动和抑制室性快速性心律失常的预测因素,对261例患者的心脏程控刺激结果进行了评估:66例表现为非持续性室性心动过速,91例表现为持续性室性心动过速,104例表现为心室颤动。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,就诊时的心律失常是电生理研究中诱发室性心律失常能力的有力且独立的预测因素;心肌梗死病史和男性也是显著的独立预测因素。在表现为持续性室性心动过速的患者中,89%(91例中的81例)可诱发出室性心律失常,相比之下,非持续性室性心动过速患者和心室颤动患者的这一比例分别为61%(66例中的40例)和66%(104例中的69例)。仅52%(66例中的34例)表现为持续性室性心动过速的患者可实现对诱发性心律失常的完全抑制,相比之下,表现为非持续性室性心动过速和心室颤动的患者这一比例分别为73%(33例中的24例)和75%(61例中的46例)。多因素分析表明,抑制诱发性心律失常能力的主要独立决定因素是电生理研究前进行的药物试验次数(呈负相关)以及诱发心律失常的性质。因此,就诊时临床心律失常的性质是电生理检查期间诱发室性心律失常能力的高度显著且独立的预测因素,也是自发性室性快速性心律失常患者抑制诱发性心律失常能力的重要决定因素。