Sunjaya Anthony Paulo, Godinho Myron Anthony, Jonnagaddala Jitendra, Kuziemsky Craig, Tu Karen, Islam Rafiqul, Okui Tasuku, Nakashima Naoki, Silva-Valencia Javier, Rojas-Mezarina Leonardo, Marcelo Alvin, Wye Sabrina Wong Kay, Hsu Chien-Yeh, Hoang Uy, Westfall Jack, de Lusignan Simon, Liaw Siaw-Teng
The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Australia.
Westmead Applied Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia.
Yearb Med Inform. 2024 Aug;33(1):32-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800716. Epub 2025 Apr 8.
Precision and personalised medicine requires comprehensive genetic, epigenetic, lifestyle, social, community and environmental knowledge of the patient. This approach highlights the importance of the social determinants of health (SDoH), described by the World Health Organization (WHO) as 'the non-medical factors that influence health outcomes, the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life such as economic policies and systems, development agendas, social norms, social policies and political systems'.
This study examined if countries collect SDoH indicators and, if they do, the quality of the data and whether they are fit for clinical and population health purposes. The sources of data were EHR networks and, where not available, national data collections.
While demographic details (age, gender) and rurality were well documented in most countries, we found that data availability and quality for education, occupation, income, socio-economic status, and residential care varied considerably between countries. Data for smoking, obesity, alcohol use, mental health, and substance use were generally poorly recorded.
Recommendations include a universal set of indicators and taxonomy for SDoH; common data model and metadata standards for national and global harmonisation and monitoring; benchmarks for data quality and fitness-for-purpose; capacity building at national and subnational levels in data collection, data analysis, communication and dissemination of results; ethical and transparent data stewardship; and governance, leadership and diplomacy across multiple sectors to co-create an enabling policy and regulatory environment.
精准医学和个性化医疗需要全面了解患者的基因、表观遗传、生活方式、社会、社区及环境等方面的信息。这种方法凸显了健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)的重要性,世界卫生组织(WHO)将其描述为“影响健康结果的非医学因素,即人们出生、成长、工作、生活和衰老的环境,以及塑造日常生活条件的更广泛的力量和系统,如经济政策和体系、发展议程、社会规范、社会政策和政治制度”。
本研究调查了各国是否收集健康的社会决定因素指标,若收集,数据质量如何以及这些数据是否适用于临床和人群健康目的。数据来源为电子健康记录(EHR)网络,若无法获取,则为国家数据收集。
虽然大多数国家都详细记录了人口统计学细节(年龄、性别)和农村地区情况,但我们发现,各国在教育、职业、收入、社会经济地位和机构照料方面的数据可得性和质量差异很大。吸烟、肥胖、饮酒、心理健康和药物使用方面的数据记录普遍较差。
建议包括一套通用的健康社会决定因素指标和分类法;用于国家和全球协调及监测的通用数据模型和元数据标准;数据质量和适用性的基准;国家和次国家层面在数据收集、数据分析、结果沟通与传播方面的能力建设;符合伦理且透明的数据管理;以及跨多个部门的治理、领导和外交,以共同营造有利的政策和监管环境。