Suppr超能文献

儿童和青少年中伤害性、神经性和神经可塑性疼痛的鉴别方法:心理测量特性和可行性的系统评价

Methods to discriminate between nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic in children & adolescents: A systematic review of psychometric properties and feasibility.

作者信息

Khillan Aayushi, Carter Liam, Amor David J, Berryman Carolyn, Harvey Adrienne

机构信息

Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Neurodisability and Rehabilitation, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Ability WA, 106 Bradford Street, Coolbinia, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Pain. 2025 Jun;31:105388. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105388. Epub 2025 Apr 6.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to identify and critically analyse the tools available for categorising pain as nociceptive, neuropathic and nociplastic pain in children and adolescents. Studies were included if they (i) included children and adolescents with a mean age of 0-24 years old, (ii) examined assessment tools that categorise pain as nociceptive, neuropathic or nociplastic, and (iii) examined the psychometric properties of the tools. Sensitive searches were conducted in five online databases in March 2024. Eligible studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality by two authors using COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. The search yielded 26 studies for 11 tools. No assessment tool had evidence for all nine recommended psychometric properties. Quantitative Sensory Testing, a tool used to identify signs and symptoms of nociplastic and neuropathic pain, was the most studied tool and had moderate evidence for construct validity, criterion validity and reliability. Three self-reported questionnaires, the Self-reported Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS), Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI) and PainDETECT, had moderate evidence for construct validity and show promise as preliminary tools to identify possible neuropathic or nociplastic pain. However, they had low specificity when used in isolation. All assessment methods would benefit from further psychometric evaluation and validation in children and adolescents. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review highlights the limited validation of pain assessment tools for children and adolescents. While Quantitative Sensory Testing and self-reported questionnaires show promise in identifying pain mechanisms, their applicability remains uncertain. Further psychometric validation is crucial to improve pain assessment and guide personalized treatment in young populations.

摘要

本系统评价的目的是识别并批判性地分析可用于将儿童和青少年的疼痛分类为伤害性疼痛、神经性疼痛和神经可塑性疼痛的工具。纳入的研究需满足以下条件:(i)纳入平均年龄为0至24岁的儿童和青少年;(ii)研究将疼痛分类为伤害性、神经性或神经可塑性的评估工具;(iii)研究工具的心理测量特性。2024年3月在五个在线数据库中进行了全面检索。由两位作者使用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)对符合条件的研究进行偏倚风险和质量评估。检索共得到针对11种工具的26项研究。没有一种评估工具具备所有九项推荐心理测量特性的证据。定量感觉测试是一种用于识别神经可塑性和神经性疼痛体征和症状的工具,是研究最多的工具,在结构效度、效标效度和信度方面有中等证据支持。三种自我报告问卷,即自我报告的利兹神经病变症状和体征评估量表(S-LANSS)、中枢敏化量表(CSI)和疼痛探测器,在结构效度方面有中等证据支持,有望作为识别可能的神经性或神经可塑性疼痛的初步工具。然而,单独使用时它们的特异性较低。所有评估方法都将受益于在儿童和青少年中进行进一步的心理测量评估和验证。观点:本系统评价突出了儿童和青少年疼痛评估工具验证的局限性。虽然定量感觉测试和自我报告问卷在识别疼痛机制方面显示出前景,但其适用性仍不确定。进一步的心理测量验证对于改善年轻人群的疼痛评估和指导个性化治疗至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验