Qeadan Fares, Shimizu Sydney, Tingey Benjamin, Kroth Philip J, Markossian Talar
Loyola University Chicago, Parkinson School of Health Sciences and Public Health, Maywood, IL, USA.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Mar 14;30:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101780. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift from in-person substance use disorder (SUD) treatment to virtual telehealth (TH) visits, creating opportunities to assess the impact of virtual visits on SUD treatment.
This study utilized retrospective, de-identified, electronic health record (EHR) data from Oracle EHR Real-World Data to examine the impact of TH on SUD treatment. Patients with a qualifying SUD diagnosis from 141 U.S. health systems were included and divided into pre-TH (January 1, 2017 through January 1, 2019) and COVID (January 1, 2020 through January 1, 2022) cohorts. This study analyzed TH utilization, medications for SUD (MSUD) prescribing, drug-related events, and mental health crises, comparing patient outcomes where the treating clinician was a high TH user versus a low TH user in both pre-COVID and COVID periods.
Patients visiting high TH clinicians had lower MSUD prescribing rates, yet a higher MSUD day's supply, and higher rates of TH outpatient visits than those visiting low TH providers, with both groups having an increase in TH visits during the COVID period. Patients with high TH clinicians had lower rates of SUD-related hospitalizations than those with low TH providers but similar rates of drug overdoses, relapses, injection-related infections, and mental health crises.
TH modalities showed increased SUD-related outpatient visits without increasing adverse outcomes, indicating its potential as a sustainable alternative to in-person care. This study highlights the need for further research on TH efficacy for SUD-specific populations and supports the continued integration of telehealth in SUD treatment post-pandemic.
新冠疫情使得物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗从面对面治疗转向虚拟远程医疗(TH)就诊,为评估虚拟就诊对SUD治疗的影响创造了机会。
本研究利用来自甲骨文电子健康记录真实世界数据的回顾性、去识别化电子健康记录(EHR)数据,以检查远程医疗对SUD治疗的影响。纳入了来自141个美国医疗系统的符合SUD诊断标准的患者,并将其分为远程医疗前(2017年1月1日至2019年1月1日)和新冠疫情期间(2020年1月1日至2022年1月1日)两个队列。本研究分析了远程医疗的使用情况、SUD药物(MSUD)的处方、药物相关事件和心理健康危机,比较了在新冠疫情前和疫情期间,治疗医生为高远程医疗使用者与低远程医疗使用者的患者结局。
与就诊于低远程医疗提供者的患者相比,就诊于高远程医疗医生的患者MSUD处方率较低,但MSUD的日供应量较高,远程医疗门诊就诊率也较高,且两组在新冠疫情期间的远程医疗就诊次数均有所增加。与低远程医疗提供者的患者相比,高远程医疗医生的患者SUD相关住院率较低,但药物过量、复发、注射相关感染和心理健康危机的发生率相似。
远程医疗模式显示与SUD相关的门诊就诊增加,且未增加不良结局,表明其作为面对面护理的可持续替代方案的潜力。本研究强调需要对特定SUD人群的远程医疗疗效进行进一步研究,并支持在疫情后继续将远程医疗纳入SUD治疗。