Al-Abcha Abdullah, Jain C Charles, Nishimura Rick A, Simard Trevor J, Eleid Mackram F, Hibbert Benjamin, Oh Jae K, Carabello Blase A, Miranda William R
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):181-188. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31511. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
The assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) severity remains a challenge in some patients, and hemodynamic exercise testing has been proposed as a diagnostic tool in this population. However, the current understanding of exercise hemodynamics in AS is limited.
Retrospective review of 34 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with ≥ moderate AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing exercise invasive hemodynamics (supine cycle protocol) with simultaneous measurement of aortic and left ventricular pressures.
Age was 77.1 (IQR 68.6; 84.1) years, and 50% were female. LVEF was 62.1 ± 6.6%. All patients were symptomatic. Resting aortic valve area (AVA) was 1.0 ± 0.2 cm and aortic valve (AV) systolic mean gradient 22.0 ± 7.3 mmHg. At peak exercise (40 [IQR 30; 60] W), AV systolic mean gradient (Δ3 [0.6; 7] mmHg, p < 0.001) and AVA (Δ0.2 [0; 0.6] cm, p = 0.002) significantly increased, while stroke volume (SV) did not (Δ6.8 ± 19.4 ml; p = 0.07). Exercise-induced changes in AV systolic mean gradient were directly related to changes in cardiac output (r = 0.53, p = 0.003), being inversely related to exercise systemic vascular resistance (r = -0.60, p = 0.002). Elevated pulmonary artery wedge pressure was present in 41.2% at rest (≥ 15 mmHg) and 69.7% during exercise (≥ 25 mmHg).
Symptomatic patients with ≥ moderate AS and preserved LVEF experience small increases in AV mean gradient with exercise, and unlike the normal physiological response to exercise, there was no significant increase in SV. In most patients, AVA rose during exercise. Exercise-induced elevation in filling pressures was highly prevalent.
对某些患者而言,评估主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)的严重程度仍是一项挑战,血流动力学运动试验已被提议作为这一人群的诊断工具。然而,目前对AS患者运动血流动力学的认识有限。
回顾性分析34例年龄≥18岁、主动脉瓣狭窄程度≥中度且左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的成年人,这些患者接受了运动侵入性血流动力学检查(仰卧位循环方案),同时测量主动脉和左心室压力。
年龄为77.1(四分位间距68.6;84.1)岁,50%为女性。LVEF为62.1±6.6%。所有患者均有症状。静息时主动脉瓣面积(AVA)为1.0±0.2cm,主动脉瓣(AV)收缩期平均压差为22.0±7.3mmHg。在运动峰值(40[四分位间距30;60]W)时,AV收缩期平均压差(Δ3[0.6;7]mmHg,p<0.001)和AVA(Δ0.2[0;0.6]cm,p=0.002)显著增加,而每搏输出量(SV)未增加(Δ6.8±19.4ml;p=0.07)。运动诱导的AV收缩期平均压差变化与心输出量变化直接相关(r=0.53,p=0.003),与运动时的全身血管阻力呈负相关(r=-0.60,p=0.002)。静息时41.2%的患者肺动脉楔压升高(≥15mmHg),运动时69.7%的患者升高(≥25mmHg)。
有症状的、主动脉瓣狭窄程度≥中度且LVEF保留的患者运动时AV平均压差有小幅增加,与运动的正常生理反应不同,SV无显著增加。大多数患者运动时AVA升高。运动诱导的充盈压升高非常普遍。