文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

影响澳大利亚农村、地区和偏远地区数字健康实施的因素:综述与推荐策略概述

Factors That Influence Digital Health Implementation in Rural, Regional, and Remote Australia: An Overview of Reviews and Recommended Strategies.

作者信息

Krahe Michelle A, Baker Stephanie, Woods Leeanna, Larkins Sarah L

机构信息

College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.

College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust J Rural Health. 2025 Apr;33(2):e70045. doi: 10.1111/ajr.70045.


DOI:10.1111/ajr.70045
PMID:40202368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980530/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Digital transformation can enhance health and healthcare delivery; however, its application in rural, regional, and remote (RRR) areas presents considerable, underexplored challenges. While the benefits of digital health for underserved areas are evident, we must understand and address the challenges to fully realise its impact. OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the evidence for factors influencing the implementation of digital health in RRR Australia and recommend implementation strategies to address barriers. DESIGN: An overview of existing reviews was conducted to identify relevant systematic and scoping reviews. Review quality was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Barriers and enablers to implementation were mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and strategies to address barriers were identified based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementation Change (ERIC). FINDINGS: Three reviews met the inclusion criteria; each was focused on telehealth and remote monitoring technologies. Influencing factors were identified across five CFIR domains, encompassing 16 barrier and 12 enabler constructs. While gaps in evidence on health outcomes were noted, the benefits of implementation, such as improved access to services, reduced travel, and enhanced patient satisfaction, were highlighted. The recommended implementation strategies involved tailoring interventions to local needs, fostering local leadership and advocacy, planning and structuring implementation, and mobilising resources. CONCLUSION: This study identified key influencing factors and recommended implementation strategies to mitigate barriers. These strategies, if employed, could facilitate the successful implementation of digital health in RRR Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024512742.

摘要

引言:数字转型可以改善健康状况并提升医疗服务的提供;然而,其在农村、地区和偏远(RRR)地区的应用带来了诸多尚未得到充分探索的重大挑战。虽然数字健康对服务不足地区的益处显而易见,但我们必须了解并应对这些挑战,以充分实现其影响。 目的:综合有关影响澳大利亚RRR地区数字健康实施的因素的证据,并推荐应对障碍的实施策略。 设计:对现有综述进行概述,以确定相关的系统综述和范围综述。使用AMSTAR-2工具评估综述质量。使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)绘制实施的障碍和推动因素,并根据实施变革专家建议(ERIC)确定应对障碍的策略。 结果:三项综述符合纳入标准;每项综述都聚焦于远程医疗和远程监测技术。在CFIR的五个领域中确定了影响因素,包括16个障碍和12个推动因素结构。虽然注意到健康结果证据方面的差距,但强调了实施的益处,如改善服务可及性、减少出行和提高患者满意度。推荐的实施策略包括根据当地需求调整干预措施、培养地方领导力和倡导、规划和构建实施过程以及调动资源。 结论:本研究确定了关键影响因素并推荐了减轻障碍的实施策略。如果采用这些策略,可能会促进数字健康在澳大利亚RRR地区的成功实施。 试验注册:PROSPERO CRD42024512742。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/109b296b14f8/AJR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/aea3ec69ed34/AJR-33-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/3c4b87563c33/AJR-33-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/109b296b14f8/AJR-33-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/aea3ec69ed34/AJR-33-0-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/3c4b87563c33/AJR-33-0-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a34/11980530/109b296b14f8/AJR-33-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Factors That Influence Digital Health Implementation in Rural, Regional, and Remote Australia: An Overview of Reviews and Recommended Strategies.

Aust J Rural Health. 2025-4

[2]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[3]
Challenges for remote patient monitoring programs in rural and regional areas: a qualitative study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025-3-13

[4]
Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability.

Rural Remote Health. 2016

[5]
Patient and provider perspectives on eHealth interventions in Canada and Australia: a scoping review.

Rural Remote Health. 2020-9

[6]
Identification of implementation enhancement strategies for national comprehensive care standards using the CFIR-ERIC approach: a qualitative study.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-8-23

[7]
Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Digital Health Services for People With Musculoskeletal Conditions in the Primary Health Care Setting: Systematic Review.

J Med Internet Res. 2024-8-27

[8]
Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: a systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability.

Rural Remote Health. 2016

[9]
Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Mental Health Use in Regional, Rural, and Remote Australia: A Comparison of Clinician and Consumer Perspectives.

Aust J Rural Health. 2025-4

[10]
Improving the quality of self-management support in ambulatory cancer care: a mixed-method study of organisational and clinician readiness, barriers and enablers for tailoring of implementation strategies to multisites.

BMJ Qual Saf. 2022-1

本文引用的文献

[1]
Wearables are a viable digital health tool for older Indigenous adults living remotely in Australia (research).

Digit Health. 2024-8-28

[2]
Digital health technologies and inequalities: A scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations.

Health Policy. 2024-8

[3]
Digital health interventions for all? Examining inclusivity across all stages of the digital health intervention research process.

Trials. 2024-1-30

[4]
Factors influencing the successful implementation of a novel digital health application to streamline multidisciplinary communication across multiple organisations for emergency care.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2024-3

[5]
An emerging framework for digital mental health design with Indigenous young people: a scoping review of the involvement of Indigenous young people in the design and evaluation of digital mental health interventions.

Syst Rev. 2023-7-1

[6]
Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework.

NPJ Digit Med. 2023-5-31

[7]
Identification of Implementation Strategies Using the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool to Mitigate Barriers in a Primary Care Model for Older Veterans.

Gerontologist. 2023-3-21

[8]
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.

BMJ. 2022-8-9

[9]
Digital Health Interventions for Delivery of Mental Health Care: Systematic and Comprehensive Meta-Review.

JMIR Ment Health. 2022-5-12

[10]
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.

Implement Sci. 2022-1-22

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索