Yufenyuy Ernest L, Akanbi Olusola A, Shanmugam Vedapuri, Decker-Pulice Kelsie, Vuong Jeni, Detorio Mervi, Zheng Amy, Bassey Orji, Abubakar Ado G, Akinmulero Oluwaseun, Esiekpe Mudiaga, Thomas Andrew, Bichi Iliyasu Abubakar, Tamunonengiyeofori Israel, Ugwu Chinwe, Erasogie Evbuomwan, Nwachukwu William, Mba Nwando, Agala Ndidi, Bronson Megan, Patel Hetal K, Iriemenem Nnaemeka C, Greby Stacie, Okoye McPaul I, Swaminathan Mahesh, Parekh Bharat S, Ihekweazu Chikwe
Division of Global HIV & TB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Public Health Institute/Centers for Disease Control, Global Health Fellowship Program, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;5(4):e0003455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003455. eCollection 2025.
HIV cross-sectional surveys require multi-layered testing with several tests to estimate HIV prevalence and HIV-1 incidence. We evaluated the performance and accuracy of the newly developed HIV Triplex assay to diagnose HIV-1 and HIV-2 and detect HIV-1 recent infections using plasma samples from the 2018 Nigeria AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS). Plasma samples from consenting HIV-positive (n=2,773) and a subset of HIV-negative samples (n=7,196), as determined by the national rapid testing algorithm, followed by Bio-Rad Geenius HIV-1/2 Supplemental Assay and Western Blot, aged 18 months - 64 years, were tested using the Luminex-based HIV Triplex assay. The assay classified specimens as HIV-1 positive, HIV-2 positive, dual (HIV-1 & 2) infections, or HIV-seronegative. All HIV-1 and dual infections were further classified as either HIV-1 recent (<6 months) or long-term (LT) based on mean fluorescent intensities and compared with the LAg-Avidity EIA as the reference. Multiplex results were analyzed and compared with the final NAIIS survey data for unweighted HIV prevalence and HIV-1 incidence. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the HIV Triplex assay was 99.71% and 99.37%, respectively, with a kappa of 0.987 when compared to NAIIS survey results. Percent agreement between the HIV Triplex assay and the LAg-Avidity EIA for recent and LT classification was 98.86% with a kappa of 0.80 [CI: 0.71-0.89] and a Spearman-ranked correlation (ρ) of 0.689. A small number (n=45; 0.63%) of the subset of negatives tested were classified by the multiplex assay as either HIV-1 positive (n=35) or HIV-2 positive (n=10). Nevertheless, the HIV Triplex assay agreed with NAIIS HIV-negative survey results (99.37%). Using these results as they were, unweighted estimates of HIV prevalence for both HIV Triplex assay and NAIIS test results were similar (1.62% [95% CI: 1.56-1.68] and 1.60% [95% CI: 1.54-1.66], respectively) with overlapping confidence. After adjusting for viral load and anti-retroviral therapy, HIV-1 unweighted incidence for ages ≥15 years, using HIV Triplex assay data, was 0.70 per 1,000 [95% CI: 0.40-0.90]. This is similar to the unweighted incidence using the LAg-based RITA (recent infection testing algorithm) of 0.80 per 1,000 [95% CI: 0.60-1.10]. The HIV Triplex assay combines several assays in one, providing highly accurate results for estimating HIV prevalence and HIV-1 incidence in surveys. This assay has the potential to simplify cross-sectional surveys making them less expensive, easier, and quicker.
艾滋病毒横断面调查需要通过多次检测进行多层检测,以估计艾滋病毒流行率和艾滋病毒-1发病率。我们使用2018年尼日利亚艾滋病指标和影响调查(NAIIS)的血浆样本,评估了新开发的艾滋病毒三联检测法在诊断艾滋病毒-1和艾滋病毒-2以及检测艾滋病毒-1近期感染方面的性能和准确性。按照国家快速检测算法确定为艾滋病毒阳性(n=2773)的血浆样本以及一部分艾滋病毒阴性样本(n=7196),随后进行Bio-Rad Geenius艾滋病毒-1/2补充检测和蛋白印迹法检测,这些样本年龄在18个月至64岁之间,使用基于Luminex的艾滋病毒三联检测法进行检测。该检测法将样本分类为艾滋病毒-1阳性、艾滋病毒-2阳性、双重(艾滋病毒-1和2)感染或艾滋病毒血清阴性。根据平均荧光强度,将所有艾滋病毒-1和双重感染进一步分类为艾滋病毒-1近期感染(<6个月)或长期感染,并与作为参考的LAg-Avidity酶免疫测定法进行比较。对多重检测结果进行分析,并与NAIIS最终调查数据进行比较,以得出未加权的艾滋病毒流行率和艾滋病毒-1发病率。与NAIIS调查结果相比,艾滋病毒三联检测法的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为99.71%和99.37%,kappa值为0.987。艾滋病毒三联检测法与LAg-Avidity酶免疫测定法在近期感染和长期感染分类方面的一致性百分比为98.86%,kappa值为0.80[置信区间:0.71-0.89],Spearman等级相关性(ρ)为0.689。在检测的阴性样本子集中,有一小部分(n=45;0.63%)被多重检测法分类为艾滋病毒-1阳性(n=35)或艾滋病毒-2阳性(n=10)。然而,艾滋病毒三联检测法与NAIIS艾滋病毒阴性调查结果一致(99.37%)。按原样使用这些结果,艾滋病毒三联检测法和NAIIS检测结果的艾滋病毒流行率未加权估计值相似(分别为1.62%[95%置信区间:1.56-1.68]和1.60%[95%置信区间:1.54-1.66]),置信区间重叠。在调整病毒载量和抗逆转录病毒治疗后,使用艾滋病毒三联检测法数据得出的15岁及以上人群的艾滋病毒-1未加权发病率为每1000人0.70例[95%置信区间:0.40-0.90]。这与使用基于LAg的RITA(近期感染检测算法)得出的每1000人0.80例[95%置信区间:0.60-1.10]的未加权发病率相似。艾滋病毒三联检测法将多种检测法整合为一体,在调查中估计艾滋病毒流行率和艾滋病毒-1发病率时能提供高度准确的结果。该检测法有可能简化横断面调查,使其成本更低、更简便且更快捷。