Yegya-Raman Nikhil, Plastaras John P, Wright Christopher M, Chelius Monica, Zhang Siqi, Baron Jonathan A, Hubbeling Harper, Sim Austin J, Robinson Timothy J, Jain Michael D, Imber Brandon, Fregonese Beatrice, Yahalom Joachim, Ladbury Colton, Dandapani Savita, Pinnix Chelsea C, Gunther Jillian R, Fang Penny Q, Wu Susan Y, Dabaja Bouthaina S, Yang Joanna C, Chew Jessica, Braunstein Steve, Sinha Sumi, Delinger Nathan M, Sun Susan, Terezakis Stephanie A, Sakthivel Gukan, Constine Louis S, Chowdhry Amit K, Reagan Patrick M, Burke Skyler, Tseng Yolanda D, LaRiviere Michael J, Maity Amit, Schuster Stephen J, Chong Elise A, Figura Nicholas B
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Radiation Oncology Associates, Burlington, MA.
Blood Adv. 2025 Jul 8;9(13):3293-3303. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015855.
Despite the increasing utilization of bridging radiotherapy (Br-RT), its impact on chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) efficacy and toxicity remains poorly characterized. We retrospectively reviewed patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas (BCLs) who received Br-RT followed by CAR-T from 2018 to 2020 across 10 institutions. Br-RT toxicities were graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Consensus Guidelines. One hundred seventy-two patients (168 large BCL) received Br-RT before axicabtagene ciloleucel (73%), tisagenlecleucel (24%), or brexucabtagene autoleucel (2%). At leukapheresis, most patients (74%) had advanced-stage disease and 39% had bulky disease measuring ≥10cm. Comprehensive Br-RT was administered to 39% and bridging systemic therapy to 35%. Among all patients, grade ≥3 Br-RT toxicity occurred in 2% (1 grade 5 toxicity), grade ≥3 CRS in 9%, and grade ≥3 ICANS in 24%. Median follow-up was 31.3 months. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 38% and 53%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, comprehensive Br-RT was associated with superior PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.38; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.48; P = .011). Patients with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) normalization after Br-RT (high pre-Br-RT LDH, normal post-Br-RT LDH) had superior PFS and OS compared with those with high post-Br-RT LDH and similar PFS and OS compared with those with normal baseline LDH. In this particularly high-risk cohort, Br-RT before CAR-T demonstrates an acceptable toxicity profile with favorable clinical outcomes compared with historical controls. Comprehensive Br-RT and LDH normalization after Br-RT may be associated with superior PFS and OS.
尽管桥接放疗(Br-RT)的应用日益增加,但其对嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法(CAR-T)疗效和毒性的影响仍未得到充分描述。我们回顾性分析了2018年至2020年期间在10家机构接受Br-RT后再接受CAR-T治疗的复发/难治性B细胞淋巴瘤(BCL)患者。Br-RT毒性根据《不良事件通用术语标准》第5.0版进行分级,细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)根据美国移植与细胞治疗学会共识指南进行分级。172例患者(168例大B细胞淋巴瘤)在接受阿基仑赛(73%)、替雷利珠单抗(24%)或贝林妥欧单抗(2%)之前接受了Br-RT。在白细胞分离时,大多数患者(74%)处于晚期疾病阶段,39%有≥10cm的大包块疾病。39%的患者接受了全面Br-RT,35%的患者接受了桥接全身治疗。在所有患者中,≥3级Br-RT毒性发生率为2%(1例5级毒性),≥3级CRS发生率为9%,≥3级ICANS发生率为多24%。中位随访时间为31.3个月。两年无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为38%和53%。多变量分析显示,全面Br-RT与更好的PFS(风险比[HR],0.38;P <.001)和OS(HR,0.48;P =.011)相关。与Br-RT后乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)仍高的患者相比,Br-RT后LDH恢复正常(Br-RT前LDH高,Br-RT后LDH正常)的患者具有更好的PFS和OS,与基线LDH正常的患者相比,其PFS和OS相似。在这个特别高危的队列中,与历史对照相比,CAR-T前的Br-RT显示出可接受的毒性特征和良好的临床结果。全面Br-RT和Br-RT后LDH恢复正常可能与更好PFS和OS相关。