Suppr超能文献

生活方式与认知:基于天秤座评分区分平均生活方式和生活方式变化的影响。

Lifestyle and cognition: Separating the effects of average lifestyle and lifestyle changes based on the LIBRA score.

作者信息

Wesenhagen Kej, Deckers K, Picavet Hsj, Rietman M L, Kok Aal, Köhler S, Ikram M A, Wolters F J, Huisman M, Verschuren Wmm

机构信息

Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jun;12(6):100159. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100159. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The LIfestyle for BRAin Health (LIBRA) score, consisting of twelve factors, highlights individuals' potential for dementia risk reduction through lifestyle. The LIBRA score includes modifiable protective factors such as low to moderate alcohol consumption, and risk factors such as hypertension.

OBJECTIVE

We studied whether LIBRA scores are longitudinally associated with cognition, and to what extent this is due to between-person differences or within-person changes in LIBRA scores.

METHODS

Individuals were included from four Dutch community-based cohorts: Doetinchem Cohort Study (DCS; n = 4770), Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS; n = 1295), Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA; n = 2391) and the Rotterdam Study (RS; n = 5205). The number of available LIBRA components (range 7-11) and timepoints (range 3-9) differed per cohort. Outcomes were standardized processing speed (LDST), memory (15-word delayed recall of the verbal learning test (VLT)) and verbal fluency. Hybrid mixed models were fit for the association of 1) mean LIBRA score and 2) change in LIBRA between subsequent timepoints. Models were adjusted for age, sex, education and learning effects. Interactions of the mean LIBRA score with age, and change in LIBRA score with age were tested in two separate models.

RESULTS

Higher (i.e., unhealthier) mean LIBRA scores were associated with worse cognitive speed (lower LDST z-score per 1-point higher LIBRA, range between cohorts: 0.039 - 0.0587), memory (VLT, 0.026 - 0.035), and fluency (0.020 - 0.033). Associations of mean LIBRA scores with cognitive function were stronger with older age (LDST: significant age-interaction, 2 out of 4 cohorts; VLT and fluency: 1 out of 4 cohorts). Relative to 65-year-old individuals with a mean LIBRA score at the 50th percentile, individuals at the 90th percentile of the LIBRA score showed an estimated 1.9-3.2 years more advanced cognitive ageing for LDST, 1.9 - 5.3 years for VLT and 1.4 - 1.7 years for fluency. Within-person change in LIBRA showed no consistent associations with cognitive decline.

CONCLUSIONS

An individual's mean LIBRA score, but not their change in LIBRA score over time, was longitudinally associated with cognitive functioning. In the general population, the investigated version of the LIBRA score is possibly not suitable to capture how cognition (as a proxy for dementia risk) changes with improvements in lifestyle.

摘要

背景

大脑健康生活方式(LIBRA)评分由十二个因素组成,突出了个体通过生活方式降低痴呆风险的潜力。LIBRA评分包括可改变的保护因素,如低至适度饮酒,以及风险因素,如高血压。

目的

我们研究了LIBRA评分是否与认知存在纵向关联,以及这在多大程度上是由于个体间差异或LIBRA评分的个体内变化所致。

方法

研究对象来自荷兰四个基于社区的队列:多廷赫姆队列研究(DCS;n = 4770)、马斯特里赫特衰老研究(MAAS;n = 1295)、阿姆斯特丹纵向衰老研究(LASA;n = 2391)和鹿特丹研究(RS;n = 5205)。每个队列中可用的LIBRA成分数量(范围为7 - 11)和时间点数量(范围为3 - 9)各不相同。结局指标为标准化处理速度(LDST)、记忆力(言语学习测试(VLT)的15词延迟回忆)和言语流畅性。采用混合混合模型来分析1)平均LIBRA评分与2)后续时间点之间LIBRA评分的变化之间的关联。模型对年龄、性别、教育程度和学习效应进行了校正。在两个单独的模型中测试了平均LIBRA评分与年龄的交互作用以及LIBRA评分变化与年龄的交互作用。

结果

较高(即较不健康)的平均LIBRA评分与较差的认知速度(LIBRA每升高1分,LDST z评分降低,各队列范围:0.039 - 0.0587)、记忆力(VLT,0.026 - 0.035)和流畅性(0.0

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验