Oishi Ritsuko, Kobayashi Satoshi, Nagashima Shuhei, Fukushima Taito, Tezuka Shun, Morimoto Manabu, Ueno Makoto, Maeda Shin
Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, 2-3-2, Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama City, 241-0815, Kanagawa, Japan.
Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafune-cho, Minami-ku, Yokohama City, 232-0024, Kanagawa, Japan.
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14014-1.
The current standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a combination chemotherapy regimen. However, whether the efficacy of combination therapy is superior to that of monotherapy in older patients with BTC remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with those of combination therapy in such patients.
We retrospectively enrolled 157 patients with unresectable or recurrent BTC aged ≥ 75 years who received systemic chemotherapy between August 2011 and November 2020. We compared the efficacy and safety of combination therapy (gemcitabine [GEM] + cisplatin and GEM + S-1) with those of monotherapy (GEM or S-1 alone). We assessed patients' characteristics, survival, adverse events, and dose intensity. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Patients who received monotherapy were older and had worse performance status (PS), lower albumin levels, and higher carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels than those who received combination therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 and 12.8 months in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (Hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.01), with a trend towards longer OS observed with combination therapy. However, multivariable analysis did not show superior OS with combination therapy (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.66-1.68). Multivariable analysis also revealed gallbladder cancer, CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as prognostic factors for OS. Regarding safety, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was significantly higher in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (79% vs. 53%, p = 0.001); however, the rate of treatment discontinuation was approximately 10% in both groups, with no treatment-related deaths, suggesting that toxicities are manageable even in older patients.
Combination therapy is not necessarily recommended for older patients with BTC. Selecting an appropriate chemotherapy regimen based on an individual's condition is important.
晚期胆管癌(BTC)患者目前的标准一线治疗是联合化疗方案。然而,在老年BTC患者中,联合治疗的疗效是否优于单药治疗仍不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在比较此类患者单药治疗与联合治疗的疗效和安全性。
我们回顾性纳入了2011年8月至2020年11月期间接受全身化疗的157例年龄≥75岁的不可切除或复发性BTC患者。我们比较了联合治疗(吉西他滨[GEM]+顺铂和GEM+S-1)与单药治疗(单独使用GEM或S-1)的疗效和安全性。我们评估了患者的特征、生存率、不良事件和剂量强度。统计学显著性设定为p<0.05。
接受单药治疗的患者比接受联合治疗的患者年龄更大,体力状况(PS)更差,白蛋白水平更低,癌胚抗原(CEA)水平更高。联合治疗组和单药治疗组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为16.4个月和12.8个月(风险比[HR],0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.47-1.01),联合治疗观察到OS有延长趋势。然而,多变量分析未显示联合治疗有更好的OS(HR,1.05;95%CI,0.66-1.68)。多变量分析还显示胆囊癌、CEA、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平是OS的预后因素。关于安全性,联合治疗组≥3级不良事件的发生率显著高于单药治疗组(79%对53%,p=0.001);然而,两组的治疗中断率约为10%,且无治疗相关死亡,这表明即使在老年患者中,毒性也是可控的。
不建议老年BTC患者使用联合治疗。根据个体情况选择合适的化疗方案很重要。