• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卢旺达儿童免疫接种数据质量:常规卫生信息系统数据评估

Child immunization data quality in Rwanda: an assessment of routine health information system data.

作者信息

Uwera Thaoussi, Frøen J Frederik, Papadopoulou Eleni, Rukundo Enock, Sibomana Hassan, Muhire Andrew, Tumusiime David K, Venkateswaran Mahima

机构信息

Regional Center of Excellence in Biomedical Engineering and e-Health, University of Rwanda, KG 11 Ave Gasabo, Kigali, Rwanda.

Center for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC), University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;83(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01583-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13690-025-01583-7
PMID:40205484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11980159/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Documentation and reporting of routine data by health workers is the backbone of the childhood immunization program. Immunization data from health management information systems (HMIS) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) are often incomplete and unreliable. In Rwanda, the immunization e-Tracker, an individual-level health management information system (HMIS) built on DHIS2 open-source software, has been implemented and scaled nationwide since 2019. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the routine HMIS immunization data over time.

METHOD

Data were derived from four HMIS sources for January to December 2020 from 24 health facilities from four districts: health facility registers (paper-based), district aggregated reports (paper-based), national HMIS reports (electronic), and e-Tracker reports (electronic). We then obtained e-Tracker reports and national HMIS reports from 2022 for the same facilities and assessed changes over time. Data quality assessments were conducted for four selected childhood immunization indicators: Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), Pentavalent 3 (Penta 3) and Measles & Rubella 1 (MR1). We calculated frequencies and percentage differences. Accuracy ratios were computed for HMIS reports against facility registers for 2020 and e-Tracker for 2022.

RESULTS

In 2020, varying degrees of inconsistencies between facility registers and HMIS reports were observed, ranging from - 2.57 to 0.67% for BCG, -13.85% to -1.45% for Penta3, and - 8.30-2.00% for MR1. Only BCG data were entered in the e-Tracker in 2020. By 2022, e-Tracker completeness of Penta3 and MR1 had also increased substantially.

CONCLUSIONS

Data quality in the paper based HMIS was variable across districts and health facilities. Improvements in quality of e-Tracker data over time demonstrate increased uptake of e-Tracker use by health workers, possibly explained by the removal of paper documentation and reporting. Further improvements in data quality can be achieved by purposefully designed implementation strategies to support health workers with digital data entry.

摘要

背景

卫生工作者对常规数据的记录和报告是儿童免疫规划的支柱。低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)卫生管理信息系统(HMIS)的免疫数据往往不完整且不可靠。在卢旺达,自2019年以来,基于DHIS2开源软件构建的个人层面卫生管理信息系统(HMIS)——免疫电子追踪器已在全国实施并推广。本研究的目的是评估常规HMIS免疫数据随时间的质量。

方法

数据来源于2020年1月至12月来自四个区的24个卫生机构的四个HMIS来源:卫生机构登记册(纸质)、区汇总报告(纸质)、国家HMIS报告(电子)和电子追踪器报告(电子)。然后,我们获取了同一机构2022年的电子追踪器报告和国家HMIS报告,并评估了随时间的变化。对四个选定的儿童免疫指标进行了数据质量评估:卡介苗(BCG)、五价疫苗3(Penta 3)和麻疹风疹1(MR1)。我们计算了频率和百分比差异。计算了2020年HMIS报告与机构登记册以及2022年电子追踪器的准确率。

结果

2020年,观察到机构登记册与HMIS报告之间存在不同程度的不一致,卡介苗的不一致率在-2.57%至0.67%之间,五价疫苗3为-13.85%至-1.45%,麻疹风疹1为-8.30%至2.00%。2020年电子追踪器中仅录入了卡介苗数据。到2022年,五价疫苗3和麻疹风疹1的电子追踪器完整性也大幅提高。

结论

基于纸质的HMIS中的数据质量在不同区和卫生机构之间存在差异。随着时间的推移,电子追踪器数据质量的提高表明卫生工作者对电子追踪器的使用增加,这可能是由于纸质文件记录和报告的取消。通过有针对性地设计实施策略以支持卫生工作者进行数字数据录入,可以进一步提高数据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/c2629488d7a6/13690_2025_1583_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/f0303f6a5aa7/13690_2025_1583_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/3168f9139fea/13690_2025_1583_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/54eaf4842d29/13690_2025_1583_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/ea3cccf9edac/13690_2025_1583_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/c2629488d7a6/13690_2025_1583_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/f0303f6a5aa7/13690_2025_1583_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/3168f9139fea/13690_2025_1583_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/54eaf4842d29/13690_2025_1583_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/ea3cccf9edac/13690_2025_1583_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3bf3/11980159/c2629488d7a6/13690_2025_1583_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Child immunization data quality in Rwanda: an assessment of routine health information system data.卢旺达儿童免疫接种数据质量:常规卫生信息系统数据评估
Arch Public Health. 2025 Apr 9;83(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01583-7.
2
Assessing the quality of immunization data from administrative data in Enugu State, South-East Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.评估尼日利亚东南部埃努古州行政数据中免疫数据的质量:一项横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;25(11):1864-1874. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_291_22.
3
Health management information system (HMIS) data verification: A case study in four districts in Rwanda.健康管理信息系统(HMIS)数据验证:卢旺达四个地区的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 17;15(7):e0235823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235823. eCollection 2020.
4
Toward utilization of data for program management and evaluation: quality assessment of five years of health management information system data in Rwanda.迈向数据用于项目管理与评估:卢旺达五年健康管理信息系统数据的质量评估
Glob Health Action. 2014 Nov 19;7:25829. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25829. eCollection 2014.
5
National Assessment of Data Quality and Associated Systems-Level Factors in Malawi.马拉维国家数据质量评估及其相关系统层面因素
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Sep 28;5(3):367-381. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-17-00177. Print 2017 Sep 27.
6
Quality of routine health facility data for monitoring maternal, newborn and child health indicators: A desk review of DHIS2 data in Lumbini Province, Nepal.常规卫生机构数据质量监测孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康指标:尼泊尔蓝毗尼省 DHIS2 数据的桌面审查。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0298101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298101. eCollection 2024.
7
Data quality of the routine health management information system at the primary healthcare facility and district levels in Tanzania.坦桑尼亚基层医疗机构和地区层面常规健康管理信息系统的数据质量。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 17;20(1):340. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01366-w.
8
Electronic Immunization Registry in Rwanda: Qualitative Study of Health Worker Experiences.卢旺达电子免疫登记系统:卫生工作者经验的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 28;11:e53071. doi: 10.2196/53071.
9
Direct financial assistance for improved maternal and child health data: a pilot study supporting the health management information system in Malawi.直接资助改善母婴健康数据:支持马拉维卫生管理信息系统的试点研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 5;22(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07680-5.
10
Immunization data quality and decision making in pertussis outbreak management in southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.埃塞俄比亚南部百日咳疫情管理中的免疫数据质量与决策:一项横断面研究
Arch Public Health. 2022 Feb 14;80(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00805-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Health workers' adoption of digital health technology in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低收入和中等收入国家卫生工作者对数字健康技术的采用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Feb 1;103(2):126-135F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292157. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Differences in changes of data completeness after the implementation of an electronic medical record in three surgical departments of a German hospital-a longitudinal comparative document analysis.德国某医院三个外科部门实施电子病历后数据完整性变化的差异——一项纵向比较文献分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02667-0.
3
Assessing Message Deployment During Public Health Emergencies Through Social Media: Empirical Test of Optimizing Content for Effective Dissemination.
通过社交媒体评估公共卫生突发事件中的信息传播:优化内容以实现有效传播的实证检验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e50871. doi: 10.2196/50871.
4
Electronic Immunization Registry in Rwanda: Qualitative Study of Health Worker Experiences.卢旺达电子免疫登记系统:卫生工作者经验的定性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 May 28;11:e53071. doi: 10.2196/53071.
5
Data management in the digital health environment scale development study.数字健康环境中的数据管理量表开发研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):1249. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10205-3.
6
Digital Health Data Quality Issues: Systematic Review.数字健康数据质量问题:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 31;25:e42615. doi: 10.2196/42615.
7
Data quality of reported child immunization coverage in 194 countries between 2000 and 2019.2000年至2019年间194个国家报告的儿童免疫接种覆盖率的数据质量。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Feb 3;2(2):e0000140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000140. eCollection 2022.
8
Assessing the quality of immunization data from administrative data in Enugu State, South-East Nigeria: A cross-sectional study.评估尼日利亚东南部埃努古州行政数据中免疫数据的质量:一项横断面研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2022 Nov;25(11):1864-1874. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_291_22.
9
Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review.常规使用 DHIS2 数据:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 6;22(1):1234. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8.
10
Maternal and child health data quality in health care facilities at the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana.加纳开普敦都会区医疗机构中的母婴健康数据质量。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08449-6.