Le Toquin Bryan, Baconnais Mélanie, Hamri Imad, Forstmann Nicolas, Weissland Thierry, Toussaint Jean-François, Schipman Julien
Institut de Recherche Bio-Médicale et d'Épidémiologie du Sport (IRMES), UPR 7329, Institut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance (INSEP), Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 May;25(5):e12277. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12277.
We investigated how para-cycling sport classes in the C division influence performance levels and pacing profiles in track and road races compared to able-bodied cyclists. For track races, we analyzed data from seven UCI World Para-Cycling Track Championships and UCI World Track Championships (2014-2023) in the male's 1 km time trial and female's 500 m time trial events. Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering were applied to 125 m splits to identify performance patterns among para-cyclists. For road races, we examined data from individual time trials in 16 UCI World Para-Cycling Cups and Championships (2014-2023) to compare mean speeds and pacing profiles across sport classes. Para-cyclists in the C division performed significantly worse than able-bodied cyclists in both male's 1 km and female's 500 m track time trials (p < 0.05). The analysis revealed a statistically significant variation in performance across sport classes for both track and road events (p < 0.05). However, when comparing adjacent classes, specifically M/WC1-C2 and M/WC3-C4, no significant differences were observed on the track (p > 0.05). Regarding pacing profiles, male MC2 and female WC5 athletes exhibited a pacing pattern characterized by a faster finish (p ≤ 0.01). In the individual time trial, MC3 had a lower mean speed in the second and third laps than in the first lap (p ≤ 0.01), whereas MC4 and MC5 showed no significant mean speed differences across the three laps (p ≥ 0.05). This study demonstrates that performance levels and pacing profiles are sport-class specific and event dependent.
我们研究了C组的残疾人自行车运动课程与健全自行车运动员相比,如何影响场地赛和公路赛的成绩水平及节奏模式。对于场地赛,我们分析了2014年至2023年七届国际自行车联盟(UCI)世界残疾人自行车场地锦标赛和UCI世界场地锦标赛男子1公里计时赛和女子500米计时赛项目的数据。应用主成分分析和层次聚类方法对125米分段数据进行分析,以确定残疾人自行车运动员的成绩模式。对于公路赛,我们研究了16届UCI世界残疾人自行车杯赛和锦标赛(2014年至2023年)个人计时赛的数据,以比较各运动组别的平均速度和节奏模式。在男子1公里和女子500米场地计时赛中,C组的残疾人自行车运动员成绩明显低于健全自行车运动员(p < 0.05)。分析显示,场地赛和公路赛项目中,各运动组别的成绩存在统计学上的显著差异(p < 0.05)。然而,在比较相邻组别,特别是M/WC1 - C2组和M/WC3 - C4组时,场地赛中未观察到显著差异(p > 0.05)。关于节奏模式,男子MC2组和女子WC5组运动员呈现出冲刺较快的节奏模式(p≤0.01)。在个人计时赛中,MC3组在第二和第三圈的平均速度低于第一圈(p≤0.01),而MC4组和MC5组在三圈中的平均速度无显著差异(p≥0.05)。本研究表明,成绩水平和节奏模式具有运动组别特异性且依赖于赛事。