Suppr超能文献

接受静脉负荷剂量治疗心房颤动患者的索他洛尔剂量与治疗结果——PEAKS注册研究的一项子研究

Sotalol Dosing and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Intravenous Loading for Atrial Arrhythmias-A PEAKS Registry Substudy.

作者信息

Steinberg Benjamin A, Holubkov Richard, Bunch T Jared, Deering Thomas F, Groh Christopher A, Kennedy Robert, Perez Marco, Piccini Jonathan P, Pokharel Parash, Savona Salvatore J, Verma Nishant, Watt Kevin, Mittal Suneet

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aroura, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jun;36(6):1352-1358. doi: 10.1111/jce.16677. Epub 2025 Apr 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sotalol is used for the maintenance of sinus rhythm among patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is discretion regarding dosing of chronic therapy, and the target oral dose dictates infusion doses for intravenous sotalol loading. To date, use and outcomes by dose are not well-described.

METHODS

In the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry, we analyzed outcomes among patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias (AT/AF). Baseline characteristics, changes in ECG parameters, in-hospital adverse events, and arrhythmia outcomes were compared based on target oral dose (80 mg vs. 120 mg).

RESULTS

Among 163 total patients, 85 (52%) of patients underwent loading anticipating target oral dose of 80 mg, compared with 78 (48%) for 120 mg. Those targeting 80 mg were older (median age 70 vs. 66, p < 0.001), with similar proportion female (24% vs. 21%, p = 0.71), and without significant differences in comorbidities or renal function. Patients targeted for 80 mg were less frequently kept in-hospital for 2 oral doses after intravenous infusion (45% vs. 89%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of sinus rhythm or adverse events during loading.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of target oral sotalol dose (120 vs. 80 mg) does not appear to be driven by patient characteristics, and may represent an opportunity for improved treatment. In-hospital adverse events are low overall without differences between dose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials. gov # NCT05247320.

摘要

背景

索他洛尔用于维持心房颤动患者的窦性心律。然而,对于长期治疗的剂量存在一定的灵活性,口服目标剂量决定了静脉注射索他洛尔负荷量的输注剂量。迄今为止,不同剂量的使用情况和结果尚未得到充分描述。

方法

在静脉注射索他洛尔的前瞻性评估分析与动力学(PEAKS)注册研究中,我们分析了因房性心律失常(AT/AF)接受择期静脉注射索他洛尔负荷量的患者的结局。根据目标口服剂量(80mg与120mg)比较基线特征、心电图参数变化、住院期间不良事件和心律失常结局。

结果

在总共163例患者中,85例(52%)患者预期目标口服剂量为80mg进行负荷量治疗,而120mg的为78例(48%)。目标剂量为80mg的患者年龄较大(中位年龄70岁对66岁,p<0.001),女性比例相似(24%对21%,p=0.71),合并症或肾功能无显著差异。目标剂量为80mg的患者静脉输注后较少因口服2剂而住院(45%对89%,p<0.001)。负荷量治疗期间窦性心律或不良事件发生率无显著差异。

结论

索他洛尔目标口服剂量(120mg与80mg)的选择似乎不受患者特征驱动,可能是改善治疗的一个机会。总体住院期间不良事件发生率较低,不同剂量之间无差异。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT05247320

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bc0/12160664/271fb773c4b8/JCE-36-1352-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验