Chen Yan, Wang Lu, Xie Jiaxing
Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Apr 5;18:507-517. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S507008. eCollection 2025.
Biologic therapy has revolutionized the management of severe asthma, but a subset of patients with severe asthma exhibits symptoms inadequately controlled by monotherapy, potentially due to the involvement of multi-type 2 pathways. Dual biologic therapy has emerged as a promising strategy, but its efficacy and safety are not yet fully understood.
To describe the characteristics, endotyping features, decision-making process and therapeutic response of patients with severe asthma on dual biologic therapy in a real-world setting.
We present ten patients on dual biologics for severe asthma. The biologic combinations include mepolizumab+ dupilumab (n=7), benralizumab+dupilumab (n=1), omazulab+mepolizumab (n=2). Therapeutic response was assessed by type 2 inflammation biomarkers, symptom control, frequency of acute exacerbations, daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dosage and side effects.
In our 10 cases, six of them are women, the mean age was 56±15 years old. The mean duration of combination therapy use was 13.5 months (range from 4 to 36 months). Dual biologic therapy was initiated because of inadequate asthma control (N1, N2, N6), poor control of comorbidities (N5, N7, N8, N9) or anti-IL4/13R-induced hypereosinophilia (N3, N4, N5, N7, N10) when treated with a single biologic agent. All ten patients exhibited good tolerance to the combined biologic therapies, leading to improvements in asthma and comorbidity management, and a reduction in OCS usage. No serious adverse events were reported.
Dual biologics have been shown to be both effective and safe. However, more studies are needed to fully assess the long-term benefits and potential risks of different combinations of biologic treatments.
生物疗法彻底改变了重度哮喘的治疗方式,但一部分重度哮喘患者的症状单药治疗控制不佳,这可能是由于多种2型途径的参与。双联生物疗法已成为一种有前景的策略,但其疗效和安全性尚未完全明确。
描述在真实世界中接受双联生物疗法的重度哮喘患者的特征、内型特征、决策过程和治疗反应。
我们报告了10例接受双联生物制剂治疗重度哮喘的患者。生物制剂组合包括美泊利单抗+度普利尤单抗(n = 7)、贝那利珠单抗+度普利尤单抗(n = 1)、奥马珠单抗+美泊利单抗(n = 2)。通过2型炎症生物标志物、症状控制、急性加重频率、每日口服糖皮质激素(OCS)剂量和副作用来评估治疗反应。
在我们的10例病例中,6例为女性,平均年龄为56±15岁。联合治疗的平均使用时间为13.5个月(范围为4至36个月)。双联生物疗法是由于单药治疗时哮喘控制不佳(N1、N2、N6)、合并症控制不佳(N5、N7、N8、N9)或抗IL4/13R诱导的嗜酸性粒细胞增多(N3、N4、N5、N7、N10)而启动的。所有10例患者对联合生物疗法均表现出良好的耐受性,从而改善了哮喘和合并症的管理,并减少了OCS的使用。未报告严重不良事件。
双联生物制剂已被证明是有效且安全的。然而,需要更多研究来全面评估不同生物治疗组合的长期益处和潜在风险。