Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik, Schmidt Boris, Windecker Stephan, Shah Neeraj, Gray William, Ellis Christopher R, Koulogiannis Konstantinos, Anderson Jordan A, Gage Ryan, Lakkireddy Dhanunjaya
Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Cardioangiologisches Centrum am Bethanien Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025 Jul;11(7):1543-1554. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.016. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
Characteristics of device-related thrombus (DRT) may differ between types of left atrial appendage occlusion devices, and the association of different DRT characteristics to clinical outcomes is largely unknown.
The incidence, characteristics, and clinical outcomes through 5 years of high- and low-risk DRTs were assessed in the Amulet IDE trial (AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [IDE] Trial).
An independent core laboratory analyzed all available images at the required 45-day and 12-month visits, and clinical events were reported through 5 years' post-left atrial appendage occlusion.
Of the 1,788 patients with a successful device implant, DRT was observed in 3.3% (30 of 903) and 4.5% (40 of 885) of Amulet and Watchman 2.5 device patients throughout 12 months, respectively (P = 0.192). DRTs were successfully classified as high risk if pedunculated, mobile, >3 mm in thickness, or without continuation onto the left atrial wall. A significantly higher incidence of high-risk DRTs was observed on the Watchman 2.5 device (4.0% [35 of 885]) compared with the Amulet occluder (2.2% [20 of 903]) (P = 0.030). Most low-risk DRTs resolved (12 of 15), whereas high-risk DRTs remained mostly unresolved (34 of 55). Through 5 years, all clinical outcome rates were numerically higher in the high-risk DRT group compared with the low-risk DRT or no-DRT group; significance was observed in the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death (30.4% vs 19.9%; HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.03-2.92; P = 0.037) and cardiovascular death (26.4% vs 14.5%, HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.20-3.66; P = 0.009).
High-risk DRTs were observed in a higher number of Watchman 2.5 device patients compared with Amulet occluder patients. The composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular death occurred more often in patients with high-risk DRTs compared with those with low-risk DRTs or no DRTs. (AMPLATZER Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder [LAAO] Investigational Device Exemption [Amulet IDE Trial]; NCT02879448).
左心耳封堵装置类型不同,与装置相关血栓(DRT)的特征可能存在差异,不同DRT特征与临床结局之间的关联在很大程度上尚不清楚。
在Amulet IDE试验(AMPLATZER Amulet左心耳封堵器[LAAO]研究性器械豁免[IDE]试验)中评估高危和低危DRT在5年中的发生率、特征及临床结局。
一个独立的核心实验室分析了在所需的45天和12个月随访时所有可用的图像,并报告了左心耳封堵术后5年的临床事件。
在1788例成功植入装置的患者中,整个12个月内,Amulet装置患者和Watchman 2.5装置患者中DRT的发生率分别为3.3%(903例中的30例)和4.5%(885例中的40例)(P = 0.192)。如果DRT有蒂、可移动、厚度>3 mm或未延续至左心房壁,则被成功分类为高危。与Amulet封堵器(2.2%[903例中的20例])相比,Watchman 2.5装置上高危DRT的发生率显著更高(4.0%[885例中的35例])(P = 0.030)。大多数低危DRT消退(15例中的12例),而高危DRT大多未消退(55例中的34例)。在5年中,高危DRT组的所有临床结局发生率在数值上均高于低危DRT组或无DRT组;在卒中、全身性栓塞或心血管死亡的复合结局方面观察到显著差异(30.4%对19.9%;HR:1.74;95%CI:1.03 - 2.92;P = 0.037)以及心血管死亡方面(26.4%对14.5%,HR:2.09;95%CI:1.20 - 3.66;P = 0.009)。
与Amulet封堵器患者相比,Watchman 2.5装置患者中观察到的高危DRT数量更多。与低危DRT或无DRT的患者相比,高危DRT患者发生卒中、全身性栓塞或心血管死亡复合结局的情况更常见。(AMPLATZER Amulet左心耳封堵器[LAAO]研究性器械豁免[Amulet IDE试验];NCT编号02879448)