• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Sharing the Mic: Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Interviewing of Dyads Living with Cognitive Impairment.

作者信息

Klein Eran, Anderson Lyndsey M

机构信息

Oregon Health and Science University.

出版信息

AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):94-97. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2025.2474230. Epub 2025 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1080/21507740.2025.2474230
PMID:40208682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11990084/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Sharing the Mic: Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Interviewing of Dyads Living with Cognitive Impairment.共同发声：对认知障碍患者二元组进行定性访谈时的伦理考量
AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):94-97. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2025.2474230. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
A post-diagnosis information and support programme for dyads-People living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and family carers: A feasibility study.双相信息和支持计划-痴呆或轻度认知障碍患者和家庭照顾者：一项可行性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4422-4435. doi: 10.1111/jan.16167. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
3
Considerations for conducting and reporting digitally supported cognitive interviews with children and adults.关于对儿童和成人进行并报告数字支持的认知访谈的注意事项。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Dec 18;5(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00371-5.
4
In search of epistemic justice. Dialogical reflection of researchers on situated ethics in studies with people living with language and/or cognitive impairment.追寻认识论正义。与语言和/或认知障碍患者一起开展研究中，研究人员对情境伦理的对话性反思。
J Aging Stud. 2023 Sep;66:101154. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101154. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Perceptions of a cognitive rehabilitation group by older people living with cognitive impairment and their caregivers: A qualitative interview study.认知障碍老年人及其照护者对认知康复小组的看法：一项定性访谈研究
Dementia (London). 2017 May;16(4):513-522. doi: 10.1177/1471301215609738. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
6
Continuous glucose monitoring with data sharing in older adults: A qualitative study.老年人的连续血糖监测与数据共享：一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7483-7494. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16808. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
7
Interviewing Male Survivors of Sexual Violence and Abuse: Ethical and Methodological Considerations.采访遭受性暴力和虐待的男性幸存者：伦理和方法学考虑。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP2234-NP2254. doi: 10.1177/08862605221093683. Epub 2022 May 7.
8
Ethical considerations for biobanking and use of genomics data in Africa: a narrative review.非洲生物银行和基因组学数据使用的伦理考虑：叙事性综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Dec 5;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00985-y.
9
Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.实施多组分干预措施以改善初级保健中与有和无痴呆症的老年患者进行沟通的感知障碍和促进因素（SHARING Choices）：一项定性研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221137251. doi: 10.1177/21501319221137251.
10
Ethical and practical considerations for cell and gene therapy toward an HIV cure: findings from a qualitative in-depth interview study in the United States.细胞和基因治疗实现 HIV 治愈的伦理与实践考量：来自美国深入定性访谈研究的发现。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Apr 9;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00780-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Patient Perspectives: A Structured Interview Study on Deep Brain Stimulation as a Novel Treatment Approach for Mild Cognitive Impairment.
AJOB Neurosci. 2025 Apr-Jun;16(2):70-81. doi: 10.1080/21507740.2024.2438033. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Can I Hold That Thought for You? Dementia and Shared Relational Agency.我能帮你记住那件事吗？痴呆症与共享关系能动性。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Sep;53(5):17-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.1485.
3
Views of stakeholders at risk for dementia about deep brain stimulation for cognition.有患痴呆症风险的利益相关者对用于认知的深部脑刺激的看法。
Brain Stimul. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):742-747. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
New Opportunities for Advancing Dyadic Health Science in Gerontology.推进老年学中对偶健康科学的新机遇。
Gerontologist. 2024 Jan 1;64(1). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac187.
5
Well-being in dementia: a cross-sectional dyadic study of the impact of multiple dimensions of strain on persons living with dementia and their family care partners.痴呆症患者的幸福感：对多个压力维度对痴呆症患者及其家庭照护者的影响的横断面双体研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2019 May;31(5):617-626. doi: 10.1017/S104161021800203X. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
How Not to Let Secrets Out When Conducting Qualitative Research With Dyads.在对二元组进行定性研究时如何避免泄露机密。
Qual Health Res. 2016 May;26(6):807-15. doi: 10.1177/1049732315627427. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Marital relationship quality in early-stage dementia: perspectives from people with dementia and their spouses.早期痴呆症患者的婚姻关系质量：来自痴呆症患者及其配偶的观点。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012 Apr-Jun;26(2):148-58. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318221ba23.
8
The Alzheimer's Disease Centers' Uniform Data Set (UDS): the neuropsychologic test battery.阿尔茨海默病中心统一数据集（UDS）：神经心理测试组合
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Apr-Jun;23(2):91-101. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318191c7dd.
9
"Stuck in the middle with you": the ethics and process of qualitative research with two people in an intimate relationship.“与你陷入两难”：对处于亲密关系中的两人进行定性研究的伦理与过程
Qual Health Res. 2003 Dec;13(10):1453-62. doi: 10.1177/1049732303255836.