Suppr超能文献

Stratification algorithm for repetitive TMS in stroke (START): Results from an exploratory crossover study.

作者信息

Lin Yin-Liang, Potter-Baker Kelsey A, Sankarasubramanian Vishwanath, Cunningham David A, Li Manshi, O'Laughlin Kyle, Conforto Adriana B, Wang Xiaofeng, Sakaie Ken, Knutson Jayme, Machado Andre G, Plow Ela B

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Advanced Platform Technology Center, Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran's Affairs, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun 15;473:123478. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2025.123478. Epub 2025 Mar 28.

Abstract

The role of contralesional motor cortices in paretic upper extremity (UE) motor recovery following stroke varies based on available structural reserve. However, an optimal measure of the reserve to stratify patients for different contralesional brain stimulation remains unknown. This study aimed to establish severity criteria distinguishing which patients benefit more from inhibitory contralesional motor cortex (M1) stimulation versus facilitatory contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (cPMd) stimulation. Twenty-four chronic stroke participants underwent three repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) sessions: inhibitory 1 Hz rTMS to contralesional M1, facilitatory 5 Hz rTMS to cPMd, and sham rTMS. Motor performance on a reaching task (RT) was assessed pre- and post-stimulation. Baseline assessments included UE Fugl-Meyer (UEFM), corticospinal integrity (fractional anisotropy), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis identified UEFM 42 as the threshold distinguishing patients who improved with cM1 inhibition versus cPMd facilitation rTMS, with 91.6 % and 83.3 % accuracy, respectively. Participants with UEFM>42 showed greater RT gains with inhibitory rTMS than more severely impaired individuals (p = 0.06), whereas those with UEFM≤42 demonstrated greater RT gains with facilitatory cPMd rTMS than sham (p = 0.003). Less-severe participants had larger increases in ipsilesional MEPs following inhibitory rTMS (p = 0.007), whereas more-severe (UEFM≤42) MEP-absent participants had larger reductions in interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) following facilitatory cPMd rTMS (p = 0.028). Our findings support the bimodal theory and introduce the START (Stratification Algorithm for rTMS) framework, utilizing clinical impairment and white matter integrity to stratify response. While promising, the START algorithm requires further validation in larger samples to develop targeted and effective neuromodulation treatments.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验