Suppr超能文献

1型糖尿病孕妇的混合闭环胰岛素治疗与标准治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Hybrid closed loop insulin therapy versus standard therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Tahir Sohaira, Naeem Shafia, Nayyab Izzah, Batool Aafia, Emeish Sameer, Hasan Ilma, Dhir Arjun, Shahid Jawad, Sheraz Muhammad, Singh Jaskaran, Kaur Amandeep, Umer Mohammad, Laganà Antonio Simone

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Avicenna Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.

Punjab Medical College University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Jun;310:113969. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.113969. Epub 2025 Apr 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems compared to standard care (SC) in pregnant women with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM), pooling results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA SOURCES

We searched through multiple databases like PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov etc. from inception to September 2024 and found six relevant studies after screening.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included studies that were (1) RCTs; with patient population (2) pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes; intervention group receiving (3) HCL and control group receiving (4) SC; while reporting (5) outcomes of interest (endpoints). We pooled results pertaining to primary outcomes; time in range (TIR), nocturnal time in range (nTIR), and HbA1c; and relevant secondary outcomes.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We used Rob 2: A revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials for quality assessment of the included RCTs. We employed the DerSimonian-Laird random effects model using review manager 5.4 to analyze the pooled estimates and reported results as risk ratio; for dichotomous outcomes; or mean difference; for continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Five RCTs (n = 274) with disparate populations were narrowed down for analysis. Pooled estimates for TIR (MD 4.95 %;-0.56 to 10.49)and HbA1c% (MD 0.09; -0.44 to 0.63) were statistically non-significant, while estimates for nTIR (MD 11.16 %; 7.15 to 15.15), % time < 63 mg/dL (MD -0.78; -1.36 to -0.20), % of time < 54 mg/dL (MD -0.22; -0.40 to -0.03), low blood glucose index (LBGI) (MD -0.30; -0.54 to -0.06), and glucose standard deviation (MD -3.05; -6.06 to -0.04) favored HCL over SC. No significant between-group differences were found in other secondary outcomes: % of time >140 mg/dL, % of time >180 mg/dL, mean glucose level, rate of serious adverse events, cesarian delivery, and severe hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

HCL systems can improve glycemic control in pregnant women with T1DM with a tolerable adverse event profile, however more research is needed to draw a definitive conclusion.

摘要

目的

我们旨在通过汇总随机对照试验(RCT)的结果,探讨与标准治疗(SC)相比,混合闭环(HCL)系统在1型糖尿病(T1DM)孕妇中的疗效和安全性。

数据来源

我们检索了多个数据库,如PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、Web of Science和Clinicaltrials.gov等,检索时间从建库至2024年9月,筛选后发现六项相关研究。

研究纳入标准

我们纳入的研究需满足以下条件:(1)RCT;患者群体为(2)患有1型糖尿病的孕妇;干预组接受(3)HCL,对照组接受(4)SC;同时报告(5)感兴趣的结局(终点)。我们汇总了与主要结局相关的结果;血糖在目标范围内的时间(TIR)、夜间血糖在目标范围内的时间(nTIR)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c);以及相关的次要结局。

研究评估与综合方法

我们使用Rob 2:一种修订后的Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具,对纳入的RCT进行质量评估。我们使用Review Manager 5.4采用DerSimonian-Laird随机效应模型分析汇总估计值,并将结果报告为风险比;用于二分结局;或均值差;用于连续结局。

结果

五项针对不同人群的RCT(n = 274)被纳入分析。TIR(均值差4.95%;-0.56至10.49)和HbA1c%(均值差0.09;-0.44至0.63)的汇总估计值在统计学上无显著差异,而nTIR(均值差11.16%;7.15至15.15)、血糖<63 mg/dL的时间百分比(均值差-0.78;-1.36至-0.20)、血糖<54 mg/dL的时间百分比(均值差-0.22;-0.40至-0.03)、低血糖指数(LBGI)(均值差-0.30;-0.54至-0.06)和血糖标准差(均值差-3.05;-6.06至-0.04)的估计值表明HCL优于SC。在其他次要结局方面未发现组间显著差异:血糖>140 mg/dL的时间百分比、血糖>180 mg/dL的时间百分比、平均血糖水平、严重不良事件发生率、剖宫产率和严重低血糖发生率。

结论

HCL系统可改善T1DM孕妇的血糖控制,且不良事件可耐受,然而需要更多研究才能得出明确结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验